In a message dated 21-Mar-02 7:44:15 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Wednesday, March 20, 2002, at 04:54 AM, mike wilson wrote:
> >
> > It's a worldwide conspiracy. I am also banned from turning up
> > on a motorcycle. Or my best man's Morgan 3 wheeler.
>
> We're dr
On Wednesday, March 20, 2002, at 02:00 AM, David A. Mann wrote:
> I could just imagine you giving your wedding photographer a detailed
> critique of every shot.
>
> I hope you've hired someone with a Pentax 6x7 .
Nope...I hired based on his pictures. ;) Also, I personally don't
think that
Hi,
Oliver Raymond wrote:
> I have IDENTICAL instructions. 17 days to go, and I can't see any way around
> it.. I can't even get away with a Leica (borrowed)... :) I might just appear
> with a Sinar P2, just to wind her up... on second thoughts, maybe not!
It's a worldwide conspiracy. I am als
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> The guy who is shooting my wedding actually did shoot a wedding from
> the wedding party, with one of those little Ricoh AF rangefinders,
> whatever they're called. Some of it was quite excellent and intimate.
I could just imagine you giving your wedding photographer a
On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 03:20 PM, William Robb wrote:
> I was best man at a wedding a few years back. I had one of those
> little Olympus things (Stylus?) in my pocket for the ceremony. I
> got some great shots too.
The guy who is shooting my wedding actually did shoot a wedding from the
- Original Message -
From: Oliver Raymond
Subject: Re: 67 300mm f/4 vs A* 300/4 and SMCP 135/2.5
> Aaron - I nearly spasmed when I read this!
>
> I have IDENTICAL instructions. 17 days to go, and I can't see
any way around
> it.. I can't even get away with a Le
aiting for my Second Day delivery (from KEH) of the new 67
90-180 F5.6 SMC ... it's meant to be here now!!
Oliver
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: 67 3
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> Me too. I mean, the significant improvement to the 75mm's close focus
> on the new version totally sold me on it.
That's one reason I want a 90mm over the 105.
> I almost bought a 67 300mm f4 ED IF...but then I realized I couldn't
> afford both it AND a wedding. ;)
On Sunday, March 17, 2002, at 01:11 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Darn, I wish you would compare the two 300's. I am still trying to
> decide between them. For me, the close focusing is really the big
> issue.
Me too. I mean, the significant improvement to the 75mm's close focus
on the new vers
David,
Darn, I wish you would compare the two 300's. I am still trying to
decide between them. For me, the close focusing is really the big
issue. I believe the old 300 is sharp enough, but I'm not sure if
taking a tube on and off is going to be too much of a hindrance (would
be used during so
Hi all,
Today I picked up my film from the "other half" of my 300mm lens
comparison.
From studying the slides using a 10x loupe I've found that the
Pentax 67 300mm f/4 Takumar lens is almost as sharp as the A*300/4.
There's not a huge amount of difference but it is noticeable on the
finer
11 matches
Mail list logo
