Yesterday, I drove by the site of the Charleston Sofa Super Store
fire, which you can read up on here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charleston_Sofa_Super_Store_fire
My husband and I lost two friends in that fire, and it was a shock to
see it still standing. I never drove over there because I did
On Aug 24, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
>
>> Stan Halpin wrote:
>>> The lawyers and those paranoid about legalistic matters may
>>> disagree,
>>> but I see no reason to ask anyone's permission to take any photo
>>> in a
>>> public place.
>>>
>>> stan
>>>
>>>
>> I'll second that. On t
Your's tells the story much better.
stan
On Aug 27, 2007, at 7:07 PM, Beaker wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
>
>>
>>> Stan Halpin wrote:
The lawyers and those paranoid about legalistic matters may
disagree,
but I see no reason to ask anyone's permission
Tell them you're a surveyor.
We can trespass whilst on duty.
Well at least I could until June 8th this year.:-)
If its a standard two lane road , its probably 1 chain wide(66'). Pace
off 33' from the centre of the pavement and you will see whats private
and public.It will get you close enough.
They probably had to leave the building standing until all insurance claims
have been settled. That can take years.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Tell them you're a surveyor.
>
> We can trespass whilst on duty.
>
> Well
On Aug 27, 2007, at 10:52 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
> Your's tells the story much better.
>
Thanks.
You are right, no one had time to change lenses. I wanted it a little
tighter, but made do with what was on the camera.
Dose anyone think it would benefit from a bit of cropping?
It was sharpened,
In my last photography class, the teacher handed this out, "Photographer's
Right." Seems to be pretty good. I admit I didn't actually read it until
recently. :-)
http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm
Marnie
That's fantastic, thanks very much. I will carry this in my photo case!
rg2
On 8/28/
Thanks.
You are right, no one had time to change lenses. I wanted it a little
tighter, but made do with what was on the camera.
Dose anyone think it would benefit from a bit of cropping?
It was sharpened, but otherwise untouched.
I'm somewhat "crop-happy" but I think this one looks great the way
Thanks for this. I'll carry it with me when I'm shooting on the street.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In my last photography class, the teacher handed this out, "Photographer's
> Right." Seems to be pretty good. I admit I didn't
On Aug 29, 2007, at 9:57 AM, Rebekah wrote:
> Thanks.
> You are right, no one had time to change lenses. I wanted it a little
> tighter, but made do with what was on the camera.
> Dose anyone think it would benefit from a bit of cropping?
> It was sharpened, but otherwise untouched.
>
>
> I'm som
The lawyers and those paranoid about legalistic matters may disagree,
but I see no reason to ask anyone's permission to take any photo in a
public place.
stan
On Aug 24, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Rebekah wrote:
> Yesterday, I drove by the site of the Charleston Sofa Super Store
> fire, which you ca
It's still a free country, last time I looked.
Tom C.
>From: Stan Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: A Gray Matter
>Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:50:21 -0500
>
>The lawyers and those paran
Tom C wrote:
> It's still a free country, last time I looked.
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
What are you smoking?
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Relatively speaking...
Tom C.
>From: Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: A Gray Matter
>Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:20:00 -0400
>
>Tom C wrote:
> > It's still a free coun
- Original Message -
From: "Rebekah"
Subject: A Gray Matter
> Yesterday, I drove by the site of the Charleston Sofa Super Store
> fire, which you can read up on here:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charleston_Sofa_Super_Store_fire
>
> My husband and I l
Stan Halpin wrote:
> The lawyers and those paranoid about legalistic matters may disagree,
> but I see no reason to ask anyone's permission to take any photo in a
> public place.
>
> stan
>
>
I'll second that. On the tow path we found a family leading their small
children across a log over
Legally? As long as you are on public property when you shoot, and it is not
something Homeland Security restricts you are OK.
The owners of the property, their lawyers, and their agents can restrict your
actions on their property.
Morally? That is between you and God, or your Church, or your
b" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>Subject: Re: A Gray Matter
>Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:35:43 -0600
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Rebekah"
>Subject: A Gray Matter
>
&
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Cakalic"
Subject: Re: A Gray Matter
>I might be mistaken, but I think in many cases that 'accesses' to private
> property are also considered valid for certain public use unless they are
> posted as "No Trespass
>
>Delivery people and the like (the paper boy, mailman, whatever), are
>generally considered to be invitees, and are automatically granted limited
>access to your property to conduct their business. The same with meter
>readers, who are granted access to your yard to do what they need to do.
>This
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tom Cakalic"
> Subject: Re: A Gray Matter
>
>
>
>> I might be mistaken, but I think in many cases that 'accesses' to private
>> property are also considered valid for certain publi
The sidewalk along the perimeter of a property is usually part of the
public right of way...
Scott Loveless wrote:
> William Robb wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Tom Cakalic"
>> Subject: Re: A Gray Matter
>>
>>
>>
TED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: A Gray Matter
>Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:24:49 -0400
>
>William Robb wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Tom Cakalic"
> > Subject: Re: A Gray Matt
> Stan Halpin wrote:
>> The lawyers and those paranoid about legalistic matters may disagree,
>> but I see no reason to ask anyone's permission to take any photo in a
>> public place.
>>
>> stan
>>
>>
> I'll second that. On the tow path we found a family leading their
> small
> children across
..
>
> Scott Loveless wrote:
> > William Robb wrote:
> >
> >> - Original Message -----
> >> From: "Tom Cakalic"
> >> Subject: Re: A Gray Matter
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> I might be mistaken, bu
nice pictures, although the second one had me attempting to scroll
down to find feet :o) I like the light quality and color; looks like
afternoon light up north.
rg2
On 8/24/07, Stan Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Stan Halpin wrote:
> >> The lawyers and those paranoid about legalistic ma
On Aug 24, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Rebekah wrote:
> nice pictures, although the second one had me attempting to scroll
> down to find feet :o) I like the light quality and color; looks like
> afternoon light up north.
Thanks. Let me know if you find the feet! I was using an 80-200 lens,
the second o
In my last photography class, the teacher handed this out, "Photographer's
Right." Seems to be pretty good. I admit I didn't actually read it until
recently. :-)
http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm
Marnie
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email,
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 8:22 AM
Subject: A Gray Matter
> Yesterday, I drove by the site of the Charleston Sofa Super Store
> fire, which you can read up on here:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charleston_S
From:
Rebekah
> esterday, I drove by the site of the Charleston Sofa Super Store
> fire, which you can read up on here:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charleston_Sofa_Super_Store_fire
>
> My husband and I lost two friends in that fire, and it was a shock to
> see it still standing. I never drove
30 matches
Mail list logo
