No, it's not about the joke on Boris...
I have just finished a tough project, and the last few days I simply
skimmed the PDML daily looking for specific bits that would allow me to
get the most out of my current photo gear in the photographic part of
said project. The interesting part is the best
I want to apologize for giving Jack a hard time over his posting of my
photo and for boring the list with that long discourse. I was having a
rough day, and I think I misplaced some anger.
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>You know, Cotty, you can always view the previous months galleries and
>still comment... :)
>
>
>Bruce
DAMN! Don't tell them that ;-)
Seriously, I think every single one would have deserved mention - they
were all so good, weren't they? That would have taken a whole week.
Now, if the PDML wo
You know, Cotty, you can always view the previous months galleries and
still comment... :)
Bruce
Saturday, August 31, 2002, 1:10:59 PM, you wrote:
C> Well, guess what, I missed commenting on a gallery.
C> I was planning to do the Reflections gallery this week, but I was
C> ex-communicated
Well, guess what, I missed commenting on a gallery.
I was planning to do the Reflections gallery this week, but I was
ex-communicated from the list for a while, work has been hectic, and what
with one thing and another, I kept putting it off and putting it off,
until I figured I had one chance
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> HOWEVER! The idea that the list should be censored because a few of us
> have bad manners is still unacceptable to me.
Off-topic posts will always come up, regardless of how strict the rules
are. Let's try to label them as "OT," okay? It's not idea
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> HOWEVER! The idea that the list should be censored because a few of us have
> bad manners is still unacceptable to me.
>
I agree wholeheartedly. Censorship could turn this list into dull, greay
pablum. If it wasn't for the occasional outburst (a few of which I can lay
cl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:21 PM
Subject: An apology
> I want to apologize to the list for my bad manners. My issue
with Kent
> should have been discussed privately and respectfully with
him. It was
> neither. I have no acceptable excuse for my behavior
Everbody makes mistakes. It takes class to apologize.
>I want to apologize to the list for my bad manners. My issue with Kent
>should have been discussed privately and respectfully with him. It was
>neither. I have no acceptable excuse for my behavior.
Don't worry. This group's maturity and civi
Censorship as such wasn't in Mike's original eMail, he simply asked that:
>we, the PDML, agree that this is not a list for
> discussing taxes, taxation, and government fiscal matters.
Which I read as meaning that we should try to stick more closely to the list
topic in our posts, rather than hav
I want to apologize to the list for my bad manners. My issue with Kent
should have been discussed privately and respectfully with him. It was
neither. I have no acceptable excuse for my behavior.
HOWEVER! The idea that the list should be censored because a few of us have
bad manners is still unac
Tom R.: wrote:
> Upon considering your last post, I apologise for my attitude.
Apologies accepted.
> Apparently you were just being pedantic, but you came across as uncaring. Maybe you
>could be more
> careful how you say things in the future
Maybe you could be more careful how you say things
12 matches
Mail list logo
