On 9/27/13 0:45, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 26/9/13, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Has anyone stopped to think that it really makes no difference if it's
fake or real? Either way it's just a picture of a camera. It won't do
anything for you that any other picture of a camera won't do.
My guess is it's an illustration, rather than a photograph, but whether
it looks real or not, it's still just a rumor as of this morning.
On 9/26/2013 2:43 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-nfWxVV3SLpI/UkRyhGCADuI/Sgc/0UuYK1ZkO8Y/d/PentaxK-3_02.jpgg
It looks real
On Sep 26, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Bill wrote:
> On 26/09/2013 12:32 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>> Other than the "K-3"that looks EXACTLY like my K-5II. You would think
>> there would be SOMETHING different about it.
> Look at your K5II compared face on to the K7. They had a very successful
> chassis in t
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 26/9/13, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Has anyone stopped to think that it really makes no difference if it's
>>fake or real? Either way it's just a picture of a camera. It won't do
>>anything for you that any other pictur
On 26/9/13, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Has anyone stopped to think that it really makes no difference if it's
>fake or real? Either way it's just a picture of a camera. It won't do
>anything for you that any other picture of a camera won't do.
It's not a full-frame picture.
--
On 26/09/2013 12:32 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Other than the "K-3"that looks EXACTLY like my K-5II. You would think
there would be SOMETHING different about it.
Look at your K5II compared face on to the K7. They had a very successful
chassis in the K7, and they pretty much plonked the K5 right into
I think the k-7/k-5 bodies are near perfection. If they kept the same
exact design I would be thrilled personally.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:39 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> and those are all good things, but the fact that the body hasn't changed
> means that camera pr0n just isn't all that exciting.
and those are all good things, but the fact that the body hasn't changed
means that camera pr0n just isn't all that exciting. I need some actual
camera intercourse.
On 9/26/2013 4:34 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:28:43PM +0200, DagT wrote:
Sure, but I love the K-5 body, s
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:28:43PM +0200, DagT wrote:
> Sure, but I love the K-5 body, so if this is true it makes me excited. :-)
I like the idea that the spare batteries I have for my two K-5 bodies might
work in the K-3. If I had a battery grip, I'd be totally stoked that it
would probably wor
Sure, but I love the K-5 body, so if this is true it makes me excited. :-)
26. sep. 2013 kl. 22:23 skrev P.J. Alling :
> It might be the real thing, but if so Ricoh kept the basic body that hasn't
> changed all that much since the K-7, so its not particularly exciting.
>
> On 9/26/2013 2:05 PM,
It might be the real thing, but if so Ricoh kept the basic body that
hasn't changed all that much since the K-7, so its not particularly
exciting.
On 9/26/2013 2:05 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
This looks like it could be real
http://photorumors.com/2013/09/26/first-picture-of-the-new-pentax-k-3
My GOD. He's RIGHT.
Now I know why we pay him the big bucks.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Zos Xavius wrote:
>
>>This looks like it could be real
>>
>>http://photorumors.com/2013/09/26/first-picture-of-the-new-pentax-k-3-dslr-camera/
>
> Has anyone stopped to think t
Zos Xavius wrote:
>This looks like it could be real
>
>http://photorumors.com/2013/09/26/first-picture-of-the-new-pentax-k-3-dslr-camera/
Has anyone stopped to think that it really makes no difference if it's
fake or real? Either way it's just a picture of a camera. It won't do
anything for y
Gee, but I wonder why it isn't as SHARP as the one on the left.
And are you telling me you can't see the uneven spots in the circles
of the lens front?
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
> https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-nfWxVV3SLpI/UkRyhGCADuI/Sgc/0UuYK1ZkO8Y/d/Pentax
"Looks" is a keyword for me in this sentence... It will *be* real, when
it is announced. Before then - naturally dwelling in rumours is rightful
and valid thing to do, but personally - I much rather we talked about
art or photography...
On 9/26/2013 9:43 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
https://lh5.goog
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-nfWxVV3SLpI/UkRyhGCADuI/Sgc/0UuYK1ZkO8Y/d/PentaxK-3_02.jpgg
It looks real
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
> quoting photorumors themselves:
>
> "I don't think so, digicame-info always posts real stuff, they have an
> excellent track r
quoting photorumors themselves:
"I don't think so, digicame-info always posts real stuff, they have an
excellent track record."
A grain of salt might be necessary here...
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> Other than the "K-3"that looks EXACTLY like my K-5II. You would think
Other than the "K-3"that looks EXACTLY like my K-5II. You would think
there would be SOMETHING different about it. (The K-5II also sold in
kits with that lens, the 18-135mm). I would bet that image is just
"re-purposed" to put it nicely.
I do believe the K-3 will be announced in October, but beyon
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
> This looks like it could be real
>
> http://photorumors.com/2013/09/26/first-picture-of-the-new-pentax-k-3-dslr-camera/
I'm not going to believe anything until I see it from Ricoh. There've
been too many rumors for far too long, and I'm do
This looks like it could be real
http://photorumors.com/2013/09/26/first-picture-of-the-new-pentax-k-3-dslr-camera/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
20 matches
Mail list logo
