On Apr 6, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Martin Trautmann wrote:
BTW: are there any known details why 20/2.8, 24/2.0 and 28/2.8 where
discontinued, although these lenses where good quality, good value and
even more suitable for DSLR crop factors?
Poor sales.
-Aaron
On 2006-04-04 10:52, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Any comments on the quality of the subject lens?
AFAIK it's very good value.
BTW: are there any known details why 20/2.8, 24/2.0 and 28/2.8 where
discontinued, although these lenses where good quality, good value and
even more suitable for DSLR crop f
On 4/5/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any comments on the quality of the subject lens?
>
>
> Shel
>
Only, "I've never used it"
HTH
Dave ;-)
--
"All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy." -
Spike Milligan
Thanks, I did try now but it is no longer on their list.
Henk
> -Original Message-
> From: Thibouille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 April, 2006 2:59 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Comments on 28mm F2.8 FA AL
>
>
> Did you try www.te
Only have the SMC-F version (not AL I think).
I think it is a different design but focal is really nice on my D and
focussing is sure hell fast (due to very short focussing ring ramp).
On 4/4/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any comments on the quality of the subject lens?
>
-
> > From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 05 April, 2006 12:56 AM
> > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> > Subject: Re: Comments on 28mm F2.8 FA AL
> >
> >
> > Thanks Perry, Mark, Godders ...
> >
> > I'm musing over wh
Thanks for your comments, Dave. Everyone seems happy with the lens, so
it's now on my very short list.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: David Oswald
> I tried a few times to buy the FA35/2 a year ago, and kept missing them
> on eBay and B&H. Finally I gave up. A few months later I got my
uss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Comments on 28mm F2.8 FA AL
>
>
> Thanks Perry, Mark, Godders ...
>
> I'm musing over which will be the next lens I get for the
> istDS ... either the FA28/2.8 or the FA35/2.0
>
> The FA20~35 is definitely on the list as well
>
>
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi,
Any comments on the quality of the subject lens?
Shel
Shel,
I tried a few times to buy the FA35/2 a year ago, and kept missing them
on eBay and B&H. Finally I gave up. A few months later I got myself
the SMC Pentax-FA 28mm f/2.8 AL. It has become my most ofte
Shel,
I'll just add "me too" to Perry, Mark and Godfrey's remarks. I have
it, and it makes for a very nice wider normal on the D bodies.
j
On 4/4/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Perry, Mark, Godders ...
>
> I'm musing over which will be the next lens I get for the istDS ..
Thanks Perry, Mark, Godders ...
I'm musing over which will be the next lens I get for the istDS ... either
the FA28/2.8 or the FA35/2.0
The FA20~35 is definitely on the list as well
Shel
> Any comments on the quality of the subject lens?
Everything I've seen taken with it shows it to be an excellent
performer. It's very similar (a little smaller) to the FA35/2 AL in
weight and feel, rendering. I am tempted to go for one although I
really don't need it.
The focal length is a very nice "wide-normal" on 16x24, one of my
favo
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>Any comments on the quality of the subject lens?
My perennial vote for "best bang for the buck" in Pentax's line-up.
Shel,
It is a nice lens. Size, weight and handling is similar to the FA
50/1.7. Sharpness is very good. Auto focus is pretty fast. The
manual focusing ring is not great but it is OK.
Perry.
On 4/4/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any comments on the quality of the subje
Hi,
Any comments on the quality of the subject lens?
Shel
15 matches
Mail list logo
