On 12 Mar 2002 at 8:51, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> I'm currently printing a series of about 25 lovely images (not mine),
> all shot with a Rebel on Fujicolor Superia 200, rated at 800 and
> bleach-bypassed. They're just fantastic.
Does this mean you left out a step of the C-41 process?
What
On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 09:00 AM, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
> When your rhetoric is reduced to a single sentence, "Spending money on
> camera
> equipment is consumerism when you buy Nikon and Canon, and isn't when
> you buy
> Pentax." is exactly what one gets.
Bruce, I can put words in y
gt; From: Bruce Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 March 2002 14:01
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Consume yourself happy with instant gratification
> (WAS:Silly Photo.net thread)
>
>
> When your rhetoric is reduced to a single sentence, "Spending
>
When your rhetoric is reduced to a single sentence, "Spending money on camera
equipment is consumerism when you buy Nikon and Canon, and isn't when you buy
Pentax." is exactly what one gets. No one here has been accused of consumerism
because they bought a MZ-S, 645n system or expensive lenses. Yo
--Original Message-
From: Pål Audun Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Consume yourself happy with instant gratification
(WAS:Silly Photo.net thread)
Bruce wrote:
>Spending money on camera equipment is consumerism
Spending money on camera equipment is consumerism when you buy Nikon and Canon
(because you're stupid), and isn't when you buy Pentax (because you're smart).
Pal just wants the people on pnoto.net to be smarter.
--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IAC, my comment was more generall
Just because something's "supposed to be" one way, doesn't mean in
reality it is. IAC, since Photo.net seems to have a disposition towards
certain brands, it is, as I suggested, no different than equipment
oriented forums, regardless of how it's "supposed to be".
IAC, my comment was more general
And how is Photo.net different than any mailing list that espouses a
particular brand of cameras and attenuate accessories. There's an awful
lot of "enabling" going on on this list, and not only for the 67
cameras. IMO, the truth is that the internet encourages consumerism in
these instances, wi
8 matches
Mail list logo
