Earlier tonight (actually last night, but I haven't been to bed yet) I
was photographing a band at a dance, in challenging light conditions.
I was alternating between my FA77/1.8 and my injured pfa50/1.4.
I absolutely love my 77. While my 31 is more generally usefull, there
is some quality about
2009/10/11 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
[snip]
Question 1: What is it that is different about the 77 that makes it
such an amazing lens for shooting portraits?
From what I've gathered reading a number of secret internal memos and
looking at the original optical diagrams...what makes the 77
Miserere wrote:
2009/10/11 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
[snip]
Question 1: What is it that is different about the 77 that makes it
such an amazing lens for shooting portraits?
From what I've gathered reading a number of secret internal memos and
looking at the original optical
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 03:18:45PM -0400, Miserere wrote:
2009/10/11 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
[snip]
Question 1: What is it that is different about the 77 that makes it
such an amazing lens for shooting portraits?
From what I've gathered reading a number of secret internal memos
Larry Colen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 03:18:45PM -0400, Miserere wrote:
2009/10/11 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
[snip]
Question 1: What is it that is different about the 77 that makes it
such an amazing lens for shooting portraits?
From what I've gathered reading a number of secret
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen
Subject: Dangerous thoughts about glass, and a couple of questions
Earlier tonight (actually last night, but I haven't been to bed yet) I
was photographing a band at a dance, in challenging light conditions.
I was alternating between my FA77
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 05:02:54PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen
Subject: Dangerous thoughts about glass, and a couple of questions
The DA*55 is the 77s ugly brother. It's big, it's plastic, it's kinda
unwieldy, but damn, it's got some
2009/10/11 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
I'm sorry. Again I apologize for stating things unclearly. It's
something that I was thinking about on my drive home from dancing, and
I didn't get enough sleep (or any actually) before posting.
I'm not so concerned with the mechanism of how it's
William Robb wrote:
I recall posting about this just after I got my first 77. I thought it
was an amazing lens for general photography, but I absolutely hated it
for portraiture.
After looking at many pictures that I shot with it, I decided that what
I didn't like was, for lack of clearer
9 matches
Mail list logo
