On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 02:37:45PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> >On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Mark Roberts
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> No file format will protect against image quality loss through resizing.
> >
> >Vector.
> >
> >
>
> Shoulda been Dick Dastardly.
I disagree
Bruce Walker wrote:
>On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Mark Roberts
> wrote:
>>
>> No file format will protect against image quality loss through resizing.
>
>Vector.
>
>
Shoulda been Dick Dastardly.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Ma
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
>
> No file format will protect against image quality loss through resizing.
Vector.
--
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the lin
John wrote:
>Thinking in terms of my workflow where I save all my layers,
>intermediate steps & stuff in PSD files; when I have the image ready to
>print or upload, I "convert to a profile" (sRGB) which also flattens the
>image. Would that be the same as an embedded profile?
Nope. Converting to a
Thinking in terms of my workflow where I save all my layers,
intermediate steps & stuff in PSD files; when I have the image ready to
print or upload, I "convert to a profile" (sRGB) which also flattens the
image. Would that be the same as an embedded profile?
I re-size it to appropriate dimension
P.J. Alling wrote:
>What's wrong with it? Well it was supposed to replace the jpeg and gif
>standards in web pages, (when it looked like jpeg might have been
>patented and of gif always had always been owned by CompuServe IIRC and
>there were threats of lawsuits over licensing), both of which
What's wrong with it? Well it was supposed to replace the jpeg and gif
standards in web pages, (when it looked like jpeg might have been
patented and of gif always had always been owned by CompuServe IIRC and
there were threats of lawsuits over licensing), both of which ware
relatively lightwe
P.J. Alling wrote:
>You just described what png should have been except that it became a
>bloated misbegotten camel from a committee trying to design a horse.
I don't understand what you mean by this. What's wrong with PNG? The
files are much larger than JPEG but that's an unavoidable consequenc
You just described what png should have been except that it became a
bloated misbegotten camel from a committee trying to design a horse.
On 5/15/2014 1:06 PM, John wrote:
There needs to be a file format that would be just like JPEG but
without the lossy compression?
Get it to the size you wa
There needs to be a file format that would be just like JPEG but without
the lossy compression?
Get it to the size you want before saving in that format and then even
if the "client" re-sized it & saved it over and over again it wouldn't
lose quality.
On 5/14/2014 5:18 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P.J. Alling
Sent: Thursday, 15 May 2014 7:18 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Discouraged.
It really is discouraging, I shot a couple of publicity photos, gratis, for a
volunteer
organization. I processed them each to a good looking jpeg, and sent them off
t
It's one of the sad parts of doing creative work for clients. They who pay get
to say what is good..
Godfrey
> On May 14, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> been there... :-(
>
> ann
>
>> On 5/14/2014 17:18, P.J. Alling wrote:
>> It really is discouraging, I shot a couple of publici
been there... :-(
ann
On 5/14/2014 17:18, P.J. Alling wrote:
It really is discouraging, I shot a couple of publicity photos, gratis,
for a volunteer organization. I processed them each to a good looking
jpeg, and sent them off to the secretary of said organization, for their
use. I received ba
It really is discouraging, I shot a couple of publicity photos, gratis,
for a volunteer organization. I processed them each to a good looking
jpeg, and sent them off to the secretary of said organization, for their
use. I received back a copy of their electronic newsletter and the
photos had b
14 matches
Mail list logo
