Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?

e, because they show something that wasn't real. Could the "orapple" be shown in an article about fruit, and gene technology? DagT > fra: "Michael Heim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > dato: 2005/01/24 ma PM 12:42:03 CET > til: > emne: AW: Dogmatism: what is al

Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?

Answers below: > fra: "Michael Heim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Now that we are speaking about "looking away" and "do's & don'ts". Lets > get ethical: > Should photographers make a declaration when having manipulated (i mean: > worked hard in photoshop) a picture? No. Any photograph is already man

AW: Dogmatism: what is allowed?

gazine - you can't tinker around. Michael -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 24. Januar 2005 12:11 An: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Betreff: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed? Answers below: > fra: "Michael Heim" <[E

Dogmatism: what is allowed?

Now that we are speaking about "looking away" and "do's & don'ts". Lets get ethical: Should photographers make a declaration when having manipulated (i mean: worked hard in photoshop) a picture? Examples: - adding grain digitally ;-) - putting objects in or taking them out of a picture - changing

<    1   2