At 08:28 29.1.2001 -0600, you wrote:
>
>Wieland wrote:
>>Dan Scott wrote:
>>> My favorite general purpose lense is an FA 35/2 AL, although I just
>>> acquired an A 50/1.7 to use with my bellows.
>>
>>This is an important comment. If I remember correctly, the bellows manual
>>says that the
>>50mm 1
viesti-
Lähettäjä: Wieland Willker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: Pentax-list-NEW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Päivä: 29. tammikuuta 2001 10:53
Aihe: Re: FA 50mm f/1.4 vs. 50mm f/1.7 (bellows)
>Dan Scott wrote:
>> My favorite general purpose lense is an FA 35/2 AL, although I jus
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Päivä: 29. tammikuuta 2001 4:20
Aihe: FA 50mm f/1.4 vs. 50mm f/1.7
>Dear all
>
>I propose to buy a 50mm lens for general purpose. Would you give me any
>opinion on the f/1.4 and f/1.7 lens?
>
>In reality, I seldom use the aperture larger than f/2.0. So the f/1.4
>Dan Scott wrote:
> > My favorite general purpose lense is an FA 35/2 AL, although I just
> > acquired an A 50/1.7 to use with my bellows.
>This is an important comment. If I remember correctly, the bellows manual
>says that the
>50mm 1.4 and the 1.2 lenses are not suited for the bellows. I don'
Wieland wrote:
>Dan Scott wrote:
>> My favorite general purpose lense is an FA 35/2 AL, although I just
>> acquired an A 50/1.7 to use with my bellows.
>
>This is an important comment. If I remember correctly, the bellows manual
>says that the
>50mm 1.4 and the 1.2 lenses are not suited for the b
> > My favorite general purpose lense is an FA 35/2 AL, although I just
> > acquired an A 50/1.7 to use with my bellows.
>This is an important comment. If I remember correctly, the bellows manual
>says that the 50mm 1.4 and the 1.2 lenses are not suited for the bellows. I don't
>know
>why, but
A scroll of mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 29 Jan 2001
10:51:09 +0800
Read it? y
>I propose to buy a 50mm lens for general purpose. Would you give me any
>opinion on the f/1.4 and f/1.7 lens?
>
>In reality, I seldom use the aperture larger than f/2.0. So the f/1.4 and
>f/1.7 have no differenc
Dan Scott wrote:
> My favorite general purpose lense is an FA 35/2 AL, although I just
> acquired an A 50/1.7 to use with my bellows.
This is an important comment. If I remember correctly, the bellows manual says that the
50mm 1.4 and the 1.2 lenses are not suited for the bellows. I don't know wh
Frankie,
You will find it is easier to manually focus a 50mm f1.4 lens than a f1.7 or
f2.0.
The extra light makes a big difference in how clearly you can see to focus.
Otherwise, I think the lens qualities are similar at comparable apertures.
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I pr
Hi Frankie,
You can see photos taken with each here,
http://gemma.geo.uaic.ro/~vdonisa/lensgal.html
and comments on each at
http://www.concentric.net/~smhalpin/LongComments.html . They are both
considered to be fine lenses. Even the A 50 f2 is very nice.
My favorite general purpose lense is an F
The f1.7 is sharper at wider than f4. If I am correct, the f1.4 has 8
aperture blades while the f1.7 has 5.
regards,
Alan Chan
>I propose to buy a 50mm lens for general purpose. Would you give me any
>opinion on the f/1.4 and f/1.7 lens?
>
>In reality, I seldom use the aperture larger than f/2.
Dear all
I propose to buy a 50mm lens for general purpose. Would you give me any
opinion on the f/1.4 and f/1.7 lens?
In reality, I seldom use the aperture larger than f/2.0. So the f/1.4 and
f/1.7 have no difference for me. Rather, I wish to choose an optically good
lens.
Frankie
-
This messa
12 matches
Mail list logo
