On Dec 28, 2010, at 9:03 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins
All absolute rules are dumb except this one.
If you don't have rules, how do you know when the time has come to break them?
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Larry, I think one has to tell apart resolution vs sharp focus. It is
hard to explain in words, for I lack terms, but consider a soft focus
lens, such as 85/2.8 by Pentax. I used to have one, so I speak from a
bit of experience. At f/2.8 the outcome was soft but looking at 100%
image, the
From: Steven Desjardins
All absolute rules are dumb except this one.
If you don't have rules, how do you know when the time has come to break
them?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
I posted a link in facebook to some photos of Zab that I took during the photo
shoot of Matthew:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157625554834337/
which I think are a big improvement over photos I took of her on Boxing day
four years previously:
harden, such details too, rather than making a
soft photo.
- Peter
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:06 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Facebook discussion on sharpness in portraits
I posted a link in facebook to some photos of Zab that I
2010 7:47 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Facebook discussion on sharpness in portraits
To me that's a relatively useless generalisation. There are times you want
a softer look in nature and many times you want a sharp look in portraits.
Sure if you're trying to hide someone's age, you
All absolute rules are dumb except this one. ;-) I tend to prefer
sharpness at all times and touch up in PP if needed.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I posted a link in facebook to some photos of Zab that I took during the
photo shoot of Matthew:
7 matches
Mail list logo
