- Original Message -
From: "Pål Audun Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Very true. Far too few invest in a sturdy tripod and use it. If you want
the best from your lenses a tripod is mandatory.
Pål<
And, not that cheap "video" tripod that most dealers carry these days. I
still use a "rock so
Mark wrote:
>I can suggest a short answer: In these circumstances a prime won't be sharper.
>Using long focal lengths under conditions like these, technique (camera
>steadiness) will totally overwhelm all but the grossest diferences in lens
>sharpness. Michael Reichmann (the Luminous Landscape g
Maris wrote:
> I don't have a monopod, but I've used my tripod, with legs
> still collapsed,as a monopod.
this is a very viable alternative, especially w/ compact
tripods. I've even thrust a "bundled up" 'pod up in the
air several feet w/ a FishEye on self-timer w/ qu
Bill Peifer wrote:
>Shel asks, "Why not use a faster, sharper prime? What is this penchant
>people have for zooms?"
I can suggest a short answer: In these circumstances a prime won't be sharper.
Using long focal lengths under conditions like these, technique (camera
steadiness) will totally o
Maris wrote:
> My son's graduation is in 2 weeks or so - indoors, flash will not be
> usable as I'm too far away so I'll use a zoom lens.
> What film should I use (I prefer negative but I'll use slide film) - maybe
> 800, 1600, or 3200 speed?
Hi Maris,
I'll give a short answer to your question
5 matches
Mail list logo
