Pal, in north America they are all about the glitz and
glamour, the latest hi tech. I had a hard time finding
a 50mm lens new or used in Toronto, it's next to
impossible to get a decent prime telephoto either. If
it doesn't have a nikon or canon logo on it they
rarely know about it.
--- Pål Audu
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Rittenhouse
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 12:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: First 6-mp full-frame digital SLR is out
Doesn't Minolta have two or three digitals based on their APS SLRs? In some
ways that seems the more sensible way to go.
--gra
Ed wrote
>There is no MZ-S anywhere in Baltimore - I
>called every dealer. I managed to find one in DC on Tuesday, at the
>largest Pentax dealer in the DC area. They had "one". None of the
>salespeople had ever even heard of it, and they could not find it for
>about 5 minutes, because it was
Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>>
> I'm sure we're not the only ones who have deferred purchases until the situation
> is clarified.
>
> >I hope it will be a 4 to 5Mp, with a focal-multiplier of 1.3 or 1.4.
> >If that is offered for US $3000 to $3500 with other specs comparable to the MZ-D,
> >I will g
"Jan van Wijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Nov 2001 19:12:44 -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>I certainly wouldn't have spent a
>>thousand dollars on a new body (MZ-S) to go with my existing lenses if I thought
>>I'd have to replace them soon to go with a different brand digital SLR. I ju
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001 19:12:44 -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
>I certainly wouldn't have spent a
>thousand dollars on a new body (MZ-S) to go with my existing lenses if I thought
>I'd have to replace them soon to go with a different brand digital SLR. I just
>bought Ed Mathews 43/1.9 Limited but that's
Mark wrote:
>
> 2002 will be the crunch year. Any camera manufacturer without a digital
body for
> it's 35mm lens line will be getting out of the 35mm SLR business whether
they
> want to or not. It'll be interesting to see what happens with Minolta. I
haven't
> heard anything about them produci
Yes, that's wild speculation. But it's more realistic sounding than *any* other
scenarios I've heard ;-) Time to "wait and see".
Kristian Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>It's possible that Contax are doing what Apple did when they launched
>the PowerMac G4 desktop in September 1999: basica
"Tom Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I sure agree with you Mark. Now the real question, are Pentax marketing
>droids as smart as you and I?
I think they'd have to be blind and deaf not to see the writing on the wall and
hear the fat lady, well, warming up, at least.
By next year, lack
;
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:29 AM
Subject: RE: First 6-mp full-frame digital SLR is out
> I doubt that with Contax saying they are only producing
1000/month of the
> cameras that there will be any shortage of the Phillips IC. A
production of
> only 1000/month will easily sustain
>> Plus, unlike the Nikon/Canon behemoths they've actually made it look quite
>> compact.
>
> Maybe the pictures just shows it with a very big lens
The Contax N1 is *HUGE*. Even the 50mm AF lens is larger than any other
50/1.4 ever made, or close. The 24-85 (pictured on the dpreview.co
On 16 Nov 2001, at 13:02, Rob Brigham wrote:
> Surely you wouldnt market a camera when you could not get the parts
> anymore even before it is launched?
>
> This would be commercial suicide:
Sounds about right, this is the company that released a new camera
sporting a new lens mount (completel
Francis Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:49:22PM +1300, David A. Mann wrote:
>> Plus, unlike the Nikon/Canon behemoths they've actually made it look quite
>> compact.
>
>Maybe the pictures just shows it with a very big lens
I think all the AF Contax lenses ar
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:49:22PM +1300, David A. Mann wrote:
> Plus, unlike the Nikon/Canon behemoths they've actually made it look quite
> compact.
Maybe the pictures just shows it with a very big lens
--
Francis Tang, Postgraduate Research Student.
LFCS, Div. of Informatics, Uni.
TO BAD IT DOES NOT ACCEPT PENTAX GLASS
BOB RAPP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Studdert
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: First 6-mp full-frame digital SLR is out
On 15 Nov 2001, at 14:19
On 15 Nov 2001, at 14:19, Rob Brigham wrote:
> And at $6500 US!
>
> This is inside the tantaive price spoken by Pentax for the MZ-D.
Hi Rob,
Pentax never made claims about the price, the figure that was floating about
was a speculated price only based on the cost of one off CCD purchase that
Hi,
The way I read the article, the camera is not yet "out" but will be
available in February. Let's see if it actually hits the stores and
will find its way into the hands of consumers.
Mike Johnston wrote:
>
> The Contax N1 is finally out, using the full-frame 24x36mm 6-megapixel
> Philips
Although I'll never buy one I like the looks, sort of like a digital Maxxum
9.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Johnston
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: First 6-mp full-
Rob Brigham wrote:
> And at $6500 US!
>
> Thanks for nothing Pentax - you have now officially MISSED THE BOAT!!!
What's new? :)
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Use
!!!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 November 2001 13:50
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: First 6-mp full-frame digital SLR is out
>
>
> The Contax N1 is finally out, using the full-frame 24x36mm 6-megapixel
>
The Contax N1 is finally out, using the full-frame 24x36mm 6-megapixel
Philips CCD. See:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0111/0501contaxn1digital.asp
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
21 matches
Mail list logo