"Jan van Wijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 01 Mar 2002 10:44:42 -0500, Christopher Lillja wrote:
>
>>I just read the article in Shutterbug and man, I can see why this generated so much
>list traffic earlier in the week -
>>this is not just another new chip. That's a big deal. The implica
On Fri, 01 Mar 2002 10:44:42 -0500, Christopher Lillja wrote:
>I just read the article in Shutterbug and man, I can see why this generated so much
>list traffic earlier in the week -
>this is not just another new chip. That's a big deal. The implications are huge. It
>doesn't smell of vaporware
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Anyone heard of plans for a film scanner using this chip yet?
> > That scanner will have similar advantages.
>
> Can a scanner be built more cheaply making three passes? Same
> advantages except for speed.
I remember the old 3-pass flatbed scanner we had at univer
--
David Spaulding
Photographer
http://d.spaulding.tripod.com
Christopher Lillja
> I just read the article in Shutterbug and man, I can see why this generated so
> much list traffic earlier in the week - this is not just another new chip.
> That's a big deal. The implications are huge. It doesn't
I just read the article in Shutterbug and man, I can see why this generated so much
list traffic earlier in the week - this is not just another new chip. That's a big
deal. The implications are huge. It doesn't smell of vaporware, either...
Few or no color fringing artifacts, drastically reduce
5 matches
Mail list logo
