"Kincade zone" ... I'll have to remember that one.
On 4/9/2018 15:07, P. J. Alling wrote:
Mark, you should never use Kennyboy's real name in a post. If it gets repeated
three times he'll appear in a cloud of garishly colored smoke and use his
CaNikon to steal your soul, and recolor all you ima
On 4/8/2018 16:52, Bob W-PDML wrote:
[1] think of the opportunities there will be for imaginative hair artistes!
It's not enough I have that image stuck in my head now? I'm supposed to think
about it too?
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must
On 4/8/2018 4:56 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
On 8 Apr 2018, at 21:48, Larry Colen wrote:
Bob W-PDML wrote:
On 8 Apr 2018, at 19:29, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've found it a real pleasure to go back and read the words of past
members from as long as 15 years ago. Some great memories there and,
yes,
Mark, you should never use Kennyboy's real name in a post. If it gets
repeated three times he'll appear in a cloud of garishly colored smoke
and use his CaNikon to steal your soul, and recolor all you images
causing them to be absorbed into the Kincade zone, never to be seen by
anyone with nor
On 4/8/2018 3:57 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob W-PDML wrote:
I've found it a real pleasure to go back and read the words of past
members from as long as 15 years ago. Some great memories there and,
yes, a lot of condensed truth. I think it'll be really appreciated by
everyone.
We are also a gre
Bob W-PDML wrote:
Den 07.04.2018 21:24, skrev Mark Roberts:
"If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong
question."
- Doug Franklin
Well condensed truth.
Context: I'm working on the 2018 PRML Book and Im doing the annual
Quotations List as a compendium of the all-time best,
On 8 Apr 2018, at 21:48, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> Bob W-PDML wrote:
>>> On 8 Apr 2018, at 19:29, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>>
>
>>>
>>> I've found it a real pleasure to go back and read the words of past
>>> members from as long as 15 years ago. Some great memories there and,
>>> yes, a lot of
>>>
Den 07.04.2018 21:24, skrev Mark Roberts:
> "If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong
> question."
> - Doug Franklin
>
Well condensed truth.
>>>
>>> Context: I'm working on the 2018 PRML Book and Im doing the annual
>>> Quotations List as a compe
Bob W-PDML wrote:
On 8 Apr 2018, at 19:29, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've found it a real pleasure to go back and read the words of past
members from as long as 15 years ago. Some great memories there and,
yes, a lot of condensed truth. I think it'll be really appreciated by
everyone.
We are
On 8/4/18, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I'm working on the 2018 PRML Book
Pentax Reprobates Mailing List
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and
|| (O) |Live Broadcast News
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@p
Bob W-PDML wrote:
>> On 8 Apr 2018, at 19:29, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>> Jostein wrote:
>>
>>> Den 07.04.2018 21:24, skrev Mark Roberts:
"If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong
question."
- Doug Franklin
>>> Well condensed truth.
>>
>> Context: I'm wor
> On 8 Apr 2018, at 19:29, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Jostein wrote:
>
>> Den 07.04.2018 21:24, skrev Mark Roberts:
>>> "If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong
>>> question."
>>> - Doug Franklin
>>>
>> Well condensed truth.
>
> Context: I'm working on the 2018 PRML Book and
Jostein wrote:
>Den 07.04.2018 21:24, skrev Mark Roberts:
>> "If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong
>> question."
>> - Doug Franklin
>>
> Well condensed truth.
Context: I'm working on the 2018 PRML Book and Im doing the annual
Quotations List as a compendium of the all-
Well condensed truth.
Jostein
Den 07.04.2018 21:24, skrev Mark Roberts:
"If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong
question."
- Doug Franklin
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, pleas
"If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong
question."
- Doug Franklin
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit t
.
John in Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob W-PDML
Sent: Friday, 20 May 2016 17:31
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - from the archives
That looks very good. Is it scanned from the neg?
B
> On 20 May 2016, at 08
Oh, you've been looking at my portfolio have you?
On 5/20/16 12:42 PM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 13:41:13 -0400
From: Mark Roberts
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - from the archives
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-
On 5/20/2016 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
It is always reassuring to find out good photography didn't just start
with the digital age
Yeah but a lot of digital age photography just isn't good photography.
Kenneth Waller
That's not new with the "digital age" either.
--
Science - Questions we
Doug Brewer wrote:
>On 5/20/16 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>>> It is always reassuring to find out good photography didn't just start
>>> with the digital age
>>
>> Yeah but alot of digital age photography just isn't good photography.
>>
>It was the same with film photography. Bad photos are bad p
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
Subject: Re: PESO - from the archives
Why on earth do you want to start yet another nauseating "film vs digital"
thread?
Aren't we done with that stupid topic by now?
Sheesh. Just when I was enjoying new adventures in instant film
photography..
Excellent picture and scan.
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
> It was the same with film photography. Bad photos are bad photos, regardless
> of format.
>
> On 5/20/16 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>>>
>>> It is always reassuring to find out good photography didn't just start
>>
It was the same with film photography. Bad photos are bad photos,
regardless of format.
On 5/20/16 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
It is always reassuring to find out good photography didn't just start
with the digital age
Yeah but alot of digital age photography just isn't good photography.
Ken
Why on earth do you want to start yet another nauseating "film vs digital"
thread?
Aren't we done with that stupid topic by now?
Sheesh. Just when I was enjoying new adventures in instant film photography...
:-/
G
On May 20, 2016, at 9:52 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
>> It is always reassuring to f
"
Subject: Re: PESO - from the archives
It is always reassuring to find out good photography didn't just start
with the digital age.
On 5/20/16 7:17 AM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 17:22:41 +1000
From: "John Coyle"
To: "'Pentax
Lovely, John! It’s a beauty! Cheers, Christine
> On May 20, 2016, at 2:22 AM, John Coyle wrote:
>
> I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do much
> wet processing of older
> photos, particularly given the size of the archive, which goes back 49 years!
> So, now
:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Coyle
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 2:23 AM
> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> Subject: PESO - from the archives
>
> I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do much
> wet processing of older photos, pa
John Coyle wrote:
> I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do
> much wet processing of older photos, particularly given the size of the
> archive, which goes back 49 years! So, now I am scanning only those
> worth preserving and probably leaving to my son, as they wil
That looks very good. Is it scanned from the neg?
B
> On 20 May 2016, at 08:24, John Coyle wrote:
>
> I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do much
> wet processing of older
> photos, particularly given the size of the archive, which goes back 49 years!
> So, now
I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do much wet
processing of older
photos, particularly given the size of the archive, which goes back 49 years!
So, now I am scanning
only those worth preserving and probably leaving to my son, as they will be the
main family hist
Oh, i thought that was called somethimg else.
And you wonder why i get lost around there.:-)
Dave
On 6/18/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David J Brooks wrote:
>
> >Which is the Linville parking lot, the one part way up the road to the
> bridge?
>
> The topmost parking lot. You kno
David J Brooks wrote:
>Which is the Linville parking lot, the one part way up the road to the
bridge?
The topmost parking lot. You know, the one where I make you wait for
m,e to return from my overnight trek every year ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailma
I like them both. Like you say, a view that most people would never see.
I agree with one poster, i like how the mountains recede in the second.
Which is the Linville parking lot, the one part way up the road to the bridge?
Dave
On 6/18/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/6/07, Mark R
On 17/6/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I've been going through my archives and came across two images I'd
>previously ignored. I like them now more than I must have done at the
>time.
>http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
Both excellent - but I like the first one because it
In a message dated 6/17/2007 5:33:42 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been going through my archives and came across two images I'd
previously ignored. I like them now more than I must have done at the
time.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
The first struck
Mark,
You're right about the Turner sky in #1, old time landscapes!
I really like #2 with the hills and special sky.
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/17/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been going through my archives and came across two images I'd
> previously ignored. I like them now more
I always love the pictures with the layers of mountains receding in
the background - so the second shot really speaks to me. Nice!
--
Bruce
Sunday, June 17, 2007, 5:12:04 PM, you wrote:
MR> I've been going through my archives and came across two images I'd
MR> previously ignored. I like them
Mark Roberts wrote:
>I've been going through my archives and came across two images I'd
>previously ignored. I like them now more than I must have done at the
>time.
>http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
>
They are lovely, Mark - I can see the Turneresque feel , although I most
often think
Jim Apilado wrote:
>Love the shot from Linville parking lot.
Thanks. I like the irony that one shot is taken from far out on the
trail, where most people never get to and yet the other could have been
taken through the windshield of a car belonging to someone who never
left their vehicle :)
Love the shot from Linville parking lot.
Jim A.
On Jun 17, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> I've been going through my archives and came across two images I'd
> previously ignored. I like them now more than I must have done at the
> time.
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
>
> The
I've been going through my archives and came across two images I'd
previously ignored. I like them now more than I must have done at the
time.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
The first struck me because of the sky. I was sure I'd seen a sky with
exactly the same palate of colors somewh
40 matches
Mail list logo
