That's what led me to conclude it might be a juvenile Golden Eagle.
On 10/9/2023 8:46 PM, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
There are condors there but the beaks are different. The condors are few. I saw
more ravens than anything else.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send
There are condors there but the beaks are different. The condors are few. I saw
more ravens than anything else.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
album I added the full-frame and crop of a bird shot at the Grand
Canyon. 77mm on the K1.
--
--
Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le
Some sort.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Very nice. Is that some sort of eagle?
On October 8, 2023 11:06:21 AM PDT, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/101533246@N02/53243596951/in/album-72177720308767271/
>
>To my 77mm album I added the full-frame and crop of a bird shot at the Grand
>Canyon. 77
https://www.flickr.com/photos/101533246@N02/53243596951/in/album-72177720308767271/
To my 77mm album I added the full-frame and crop of a bird shot at the Grand
Canyon. 77mm on the K1.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
the south rim looking northeast - six
shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
K-3 & Tamron 18-200
-p
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never ques
and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
That's a great photo, but something looks wrong about it on my
screen, like it was reduced in resolution then expanded back up.
K-3 & Tamron 18-200
-p
--
PDML Pentax-Dis
Thanks for the comment about the change Paul.
-Original Message-
>From: Paul Sorenson
>Subject: Re: PESO Grand Canyon
>
>Thanks, Ken. Looking at it after your first comment I did find some
>misalignment a couple places on the horizon which I have worked on to fix.
>
.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
K-3 & Tamron 18-200
-p
--
Paul Sorenson
Studio1941
Sooner or later "different" scares people.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML
23, 2019 at 1:36 AM Paul Sorenson wrote:
> >>
> >>> From a recent trip to Arizona - from the south rim looking northeast -
> >>> six shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://studio1941.com/koken/
-
From: Ken Waller
Sent: Apr 23, 2019 10:28 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO Grand Canyon
Very good exposure, but some stitching errors appear on the horizon, especially
on the L H side.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Apr 23, 2019 1:43 AM
To: Pentax
From a recent trip to Arizona - from the south rim looking northeast -
> >> six shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
> >>
> >> http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
> >>
> >> K-3 & Tamron 1
a recent trip to Arizona - from the south rim looking northeast -
six shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
K-3 & Tamron 18-200
-p
--
Paul Sorenson
Studio1941
Sooner or later "different"
stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
K-3 & Tamron 18-200
-p
--
Paul Sorenson
Studio1941
Sooner or later "different" scares people.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/ma
:
Makes me want to go there again ... and stay longer this time.
On 4/23/2019 01:36:12, Paul Sorenson wrote:
From a recent trip to Arizona - from the south rim looking northeast
- six shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon
:
From a recent trip to Arizona - from the south rim looking northeast
- six shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
That's a great photo, but something looks wrong about it on my screen,
like
Sorenson , 23 Nis 2019 Sal, 08:36 tarihinde
şunu yazdı:
From a recent trip to Arizona - from the south rim looking northeast -
six shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
K-3 & Tamron 18-200
-p
--
It's the big rock that stops the internet? I've got some work to do,
I'll be right back.
On 4/24/2019 3:00 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Yea, they finally moved that big boulder in front of my cave, so I have
internet again :-)!
Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 24, 2019, at 12:51
Oops...this was supposed to go to the List...
So...apparently you've been resurrected...
-p
On 4/24/2019 2:00 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Yea, they finally moved that big boulder in front of my cave, so I have
internet again :-)!
Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 24, 2019, at
Yea, they finally moved that big boulder in front of my cave, so I have
internet again :-)!
Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 24, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Hey, Christine; Haven't seen you here for a while. Glad Paul's image
> brought you out of hiding!
>
Paul Sorenson , 23 Nis 2019 Sal, 08:36 tarihinde
şunu yazdı:
>
> From a recent trip to Arizona - from the south rim looking northeast -
> six shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
>
> http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
>
>
t -
> six shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
> >
> >
> http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
> >
> > K-3 & Tamron 18-200
> >
> > -p
> >
> > --
> > Paul Sorenson
> > Studio1
na - from the south rim looking northeast - six
> shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
>
> http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
>
> K-3 & Tamron 18-200
>
> -p
>
> --
> Paul Sorenson
> Studio1941
I take the stitching error comment back - looking again it looks fine in that
regard.
-Original Message-
>From: Ken Waller
>Sent: Apr 23, 2019 10:28 AM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: PESO Grand Canyon
>
>Very good exposure, but some stitching errors app
An excellent pano which clearly shows just what an impressive natural
phenomenon the Grand Canyon is. The threatening sky beyond adds strength
to the composition. I'd love to have the chance to see it for myself.
Alan C
On 23-Apr-19 07:36 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
From a recent trip
yola
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:36 AM Paul Sorenson wrote:
>
>> From a recent trip to Arizona - from the south rim looking northeast -
>> six shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
>>
>>
>> http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/co
, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:36 AM Paul Sorenson wrote:
> From a recent trip to Arizona - from the south rim looking northeast -
> six shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
>
>
> http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
>
> K-3 &
Makes me want to go there again ... and stay longer this time.
On 4/23/2019 01:36:12, Paul Sorenson wrote:
From a recent trip to Arizona - from the south rim looking northeast - six shot
pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand
Very good exposure, but some stitching errors appear on the horizon, especially
on the L H side.
-Original Message-
>From: Larry Colen
>Sent: Apr 23, 2019 1:43 AM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: PESO Grand Canyon
>
>
>
>Paul Sorenson wrote on 4/
Paul Sorenson wrote on 4/22/19 10:36 PM:
From a recent trip to Arizona - from the south rim looking northeast -
six shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
That's a great photo, but something looks
From a recent trip to Arizona - from the south rim looking northeast -
six shot pano stitched and processed in On1 Photo RAW.
http://studio1941.com/koken/albums/pdml-peso/content/grand-canyon-pano-k3-3765/
K-3 & Tamron 18-200
-p
--
Paul Sorenson
Studio1941
Sooner or later "differen
reached the end of its life.
After scanning and a little work with Lightroom, the image will be
around for a few more years. I'm sure after the picture is long gone
the canyon will still be there.
http://georgesinos.com/blog/2013/7/22/grand-canyon-1975
gs
George Sinos
be there.
http://georgesinos.com/blog/2013/7/22/grand-canyon-1975
gs
George Sinos
www.GeorgesPhotos.net
www.GeorgeSinos.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
. Almost 40 years
old, badly faded, the slide had almost reached the end of its life.
After scanning and a little work with Lightroom, the image will be
around for a few more years. I'm sure after the picture is long gone
the canyon will still be there.
http://georgesinos.com/blog/2013/7/22/grand
Rim
Lodge viewpoint, which isn't all that great as far as vista's are
concerned.
I thought it might have been the South Rim near Desert View.
One of my early unsuccessful experiments in using strobes for fill was
trying to balance the interior of the north rim Grand Canyon Lodge with
the views
From: Walter Hamler
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
Quite nice. Where did you take the photos you made this from?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Walter Hamler
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
Quite nice. Where did you take the photos you made this from?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
I like it. Gotta try this pano-stitching thing sometime.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Walter Hamler hamlerwal...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, June 2, 2012 7:48 PM
Subject: OT: Grand Canyon Pano
Here
Strange things do pop up from time to time Walt.
I tried to re-format a potentially defective 1 TB drive last week, and was
consistently told there was insufficient memory for the task by Disk Utility.
Apple and Iomega have no idea what that means or what brought it up.
On Jun 5, 2012, at
That sounds like a fall over message. What ever the problem is it
doesn't have it's own error message, and whoever wrote the routine just
defaulted to /something/. The original programmer either no longer
works for or never worked for either company, and never documented the
feature.
When
Been there - same result.
Being jobless, you've nothing to cling to but the knowledge you were right,
they were a moron! :-)
On Jun 6, 2012, at 09:32 , P. J. Alling wrote:
Well I get caught in the in the next big layoff about a year a later,
probably because I'd peed off my bosses boss,
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
P. J. Alling
That sounds like a fall over message. What ever the problem is it
doesn't have it's own error message, and whoever wrote the routine just
defaulted to /something/. The original programmer either no longer
And that photo of the Canyon is breathtaking. Very nice - lets see the rest!
On Jun 2, 2012, at 17:11 , Walter Hamler wrote:
Thanks, Dan. I probably shot a dozen or more pano's, but this is the
first one I have put together using PSE 9. It does pretty good but
keeps telling me I have
On Jun 2, 2012, at 17:11 , Walter Hamler wrote:
Thanks, Dan. I probably shot a dozen or more pano's, but this is the
first one I have put together using PSE 9. It does pretty good but
keeps telling me I have limited RAM. I have 12 gig installed, so that
should not be a problem ?
All
Yes, mine is only 8 months old and I added 3 - 4 gig cards right after
buying. I have also updated to Lion. The machine is fast, but not a
steamroller for sure. I just can't figure out why I come up with the
msg that there isn't enough ram. I strongly suspect it has something
to do with ram
on 2012-06-05 5:59 Walter Hamler wrote
Yes, mine is only 8 months old and I added 3 - 4 gig cards right after
buying. I have also updated to Lion. The machine is fast, but not a
steamroller for sure. I just can't figure out why I come up with the
msg that there isn't enough ram.
i understand
on 2012-06-02 17:48 Walter Hamler wrote
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
very nice job; i was there in early May last year and was in love with all the
plant life on the canyon walls
I like the restrained colour in this
On 3/06/2012 9:48 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
Well done
Dave
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Walter Hamler hamlerwal...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
I am using the IMac with 12 gig of memory. Not really sure why PSE
would tell me I didn't have enough memory unless it is an allocation
thing. I will check with some of my guru friends.
Walt
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Paul Sorenson pentax1...@gmail.com wrote:
Walt
Are on a Mac or PC? If
:48, Walter Hamler wrote:
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
I redid the pano as I discovered I had let out 2 frames.
Walt
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1883689100k=fCJ5qjFlb=1s=A
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML
Quoting Walter Hamler hamlerwal...@gmail.com:
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
Spectacular - and that's certainly whetted my appetite! There's a
possibility that we'll
://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
Spectacular - and that's certainly whetted my appetite! There's a
possibility that we'll be visiting that part of the world next year.
--
Cheers
Brian
Looks Great!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Walter Hamler hamlerwal...@gmail.com wrote:
I redid the pano as I discovered I had let out 2 frames.
Walt
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Wow! Fine job indeed.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Walter Hamler hamlerwal...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k
Thanks, Dan. I probably shot a dozen or more pano's, but this is the
first one I have put together using PSE 9. It does pretty good but
keeps telling me I have limited RAM. I have 12 gig installed, so that
should not be a problem ?
Walt
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Daniel J. Matyola
Very nice! Cheers, Christine
On Jun 2, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Walter Hamler hamlerwal...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
A dramatic photo. Well done.
Paul
On Jun 2, 2012, at 7:48 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
Walt
Are on a Mac or PC? If you're running 64 bit Windows, you can only
access 2 gig of ram for 32 bit software like PSE. You can open that up
to 4 gig with this patch tool...
http://www.ntcore.com/4gb_patch.php
After you run the patch tool, be sure to go to
Edit-Preferences-Performance
Sweet!
DS
On 3 June 2012 07:48, Walter Hamler hamlerwal...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
And why would that be OT? It's good but would be much better on a
50-foot-wide screen, but I don’t have one. -T
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Walter Hamler hamlerwal...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim
I cannot help but hate you, Walt.
On 6/3/2012 02:48, Walter Hamler wrote:
Here is one pano that I put together.
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Other/Grand-Canyon-North-Tim/23266223_N94xvd#!i=1876914005k=423ZF6Vlb=1s=A
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
That's gorgeous!
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Walter Hamler hamlerwal...@gmail.com
Sent: June 2, 2012 6/2/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT: Grand Canyon Pano
On Dec 17, 2005, at 4:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I presume they have figured that out -- a safe way to do it. I
don't
think anyone would be stupid enough to risk a major disaster at a
national park
(bridge falls with 100-200 people on it). Very, very bad PR.
Hmm, we've had that
On Dec 17, 2005, at 6:10 AM, frank theriault wrote:
Well, actually, yes, I have been up since they put in the plexiglass
floor. It was a bit eerie, but after about 10 seconds your mind wraps
around the fact that you're not going to plummet to your death, and
it's kinda cool!! I felt totally
On Dec 16, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ever been up the CN Tower in Toronto? (You're a local, so the answer's
probably no g) They have a section with glass floor so you can
look
straight down - 113 stories. Anyway, even though I'm not generally
nervous about heights (see Frank's
Is that the one with the revolving restaurant? Someone took me to
dinner there one time. I found the view really nice, but the food
only average.
Bob
Thats the one. I made it all the way to the top of the resturant for the
surveys we had to
I wouldn't give much credence to government agencys following government
regulations, here in Connecticut it's estimated that the biggest
violator of environmental regulations is the department of transportation.
David Mann wrote:
On Dec 17, 2005, at 4:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I
Most places like that you're paying for the view.
Bob Shell wrote:
On Dec 16, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ever been up the CN Tower in Toronto? (You're a local, so the answer's
probably no g) They have a section with glass floor so you can look
straight down - 113 stories.
One of our restaurant reviewers in Philly has opined
that the quality of the food is inversely proportional
to the altitude.
Rick
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 16, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ever been up the CN Tower in Toronto? (You're a
local, so the
On 12/17/05, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that the one with the revolving restaurant? Someone took me to
dinner there one time. I found the view really nice, but the food
only average.
I've never eaten there, but yes, the restaurant does revolve, and yes,
(apparently) the food's
Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not as bad as you.
6 big guys and some strong tranquilisers
and they might get me out there.
If they could stand the screaming. ;-(
Don (8 feet up is my limit.)
You coming to Grandfather Mountain in June? I know some good photo
spots. Just ask Frank
On 12/15/05, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seen before by many in a previous PESO, but it fits the subject... taken not
far from the entrance to Grand Canyon NP.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2977264
Tom C.
For the benefit of those who haven't seen it already (I know I've
On 12/16/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the benefit of those who haven't seen it already (I know I've
posted it at least twice), here's Mark Roberts at Attic Window, near
the peak of Grandfather Mountain, NC:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3434063
And again,
On 12/16/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You coming to Grandfather Mountain in June? I know some good photo
spots. Just ask Frank grin
snip
Like this?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3434051size=lg
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 12/16/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like this?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3434051size=lg
Or this?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3434063
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Dec 16, 2005, at 2:35 AM, David Mann wrote:
Well, not after it breaks anyway.Glass is very heavy and there
doesn't seem to be much support for that bridge structure.
I doubt they'd use glass. Lexan or some similar transparent acrylic
is more likely.
Bob
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/12/16 Fri PM 02:50:17 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Grand Canyon
On Dec 16, 2005, at 2:35 AM, David Mann wrote:
Well, not after it breaks anyway.Glass is very heavy and there
doesn't seem to be much support
In a message dated 12/16/2005 7:10:17 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Dec 16, 2005, at 2:35 AM, David Mann wrote:
Well, not after it breaks anyway.Glass is very heavy and there
doesn't seem to be much support for that bridge structure.
I doubt they'd use
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like this?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3434051size=lg
Or this?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3434063
Ever been up the CN Tower in Toronto? (You're a local, so the
seconds your mind wraps
around the fact that you're not going to plummet to your death, and
it's kinda cool!! I felt totally secure.
And, in answer to someone who wondered if the glass floor of the Grand
Canyon thing would become translucent or even opaque, the one up the
CN Tower seems fine
If it's going to be clear, most acrylics scratch much too easily.
Synthetic sapphire, yea that's the way to go, cast in one piece.
Bob Shell wrote:
On Dec 16, 2005, at 2:35 AM, David Mann wrote:
Well, not after it breaks anyway.Glass is very heavy and there
doesn't seem to be much
P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's going to be clear, most acrylics scratch much too easily.
Synthetic sapphire, yea that's the way to go, cast in one piece.
In case you're interested, here's the formula they use for the glass
floor of the CN tower:
Layers, from the top down:
*
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't show the shot of me clinging to the GFM rock, eh Mark? I wasn't
really that nervous, except when I had to travers that little rock
gully that, if one slipped, went down about 200 feet on a 45 degree
angle.
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:03:54 -0500
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Grand Canyon
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/05
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: Re: Grand Canyon
In either case, you would be unlikely to walk on the transparent material.
For it would rapidly (at varying rates, depending on the material) become
opaque.
The CN tower in Toronto manages it quite well. I
Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't show the shot of me clinging to the GFM rock, eh Mark? I wasn't
really that nervous, except when I had to travers that little rock
gully that, if one slipped, went down about 200 feet on a 45 degree
angle.
Subject: Grand Canyon
Probably old news to some of you. I just heard of it. No not the Grand
Canyon itself.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/08/0826_050826_grandcanyon.html
Tom C.
. Quite an experience,
particularly if you have partaken of the bar's specialties prior to
going out there!
I find it interesting that this Grand Canyon thingie is being built
by an Indian tribe. There is a common belief that American Indians
do not have a fear of heights. Maybe
- Original Message -
From: Bob Shell
Subject: Re: Grand Canyon
I find it interesting that this Grand Canyon thingie is being built by an
Indian tribe. There is a common belief that American Indians do not have
a fear of heights. Maybe there is some truth
I cound stand a few feet back from the edge of a
cliff or mountainside,
and, with some trepedation, drive up a narrow
mountain road... but
just seeing that glass thingy hang out over a
chasm... w ...
I once walked maybe a few hundred feet on the path *outside* the fence
on the edge of
On Dec 15, 2005, at 15:32, Amita Guha wrote:
I once walked maybe a few hundred feet on the path *outside* the fence
on the edge of the Cliffs of Moher, which are several hundred feet
tall and very windy. I was following a bunch of other kids. The only
reason I didn't freeze was that I just kept
In a message dated 12/15/2005 1:49:19 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here you can see my son (in the yellow jacket) demonstrating the
proper technique.
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/ireland_2005/pages/page_213.html
(Sadly, it was a bad time of day to be taking pictures
On 12/15/05, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I *loved* it out there, but the cliffs really concerned my wife - who
kept imagining herself and others being flung over the edge by that
stiff breeze!
Same here! But I felt ok as long as I stayed on the proper side of the
fence - which I
On 12/13/05, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably old news to some of you. I just heard of it. No not the Grand
Canyon itself.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/08/0826_050826_grandcanyon.html
Tom C.
...which just proves that man can take a natural wonder and improve
its
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
