price differences for photo equipment (Was" polarizer"
before)
>
> I paid ca. $30 for my new 58mm Hoya circular polarizer at MediaMarkt.
Uncoated? HMC? S-HMC? That makes a big difference to the price.
I'm happy with the performance of my SMC lenses. I don't see th
The standard snapshot "N size" print for many decades was 3-1/2x4-1/2 inchs
printed on 3-1/2 inch rolls. Then when 35mm became the standard (late 60's early
70's?) they increased that to 3-1/2x5 to match the 35mm negative. Then the new
minilabs started using 6" rolls and offering 4x6. Now that h
Ah. The Leica experts. They first reduced film format to match it to 4x6
prints then spent a fortune to develop expensive lenses that could give
you some larger prints from that format.
Raimo K wrote:
The above according to Leica expert Günther Osterloh (in the book Angewandte
Leica-Technik).
!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: "Frantisek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: Huge price difference
put filters on the lens (for protection etc)
has been discussed before here .. ;-)
greetings
Markus
> -Original Message-
> From: John Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 2:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Huge price difference
>
> I paid ca. $30 for my new 58mm Hoya circular polarizer at MediaMarkt.
Uncoated? HMC? S-HMC? That makes a big difference to the price.
I'm happy with the performance of my SMC lenses. I don't see the
point of wasting most of that benefit by putting uncoated glass
at the first interface to
Hi John
I often wondered before:
On some parts of the world you really have to pay premium prices, I'm sorry
for you...
I saw what prices Frank quoted for Canada for example and I could make a
small profit
buying used equipment here and sell it to KEH if they really pay their
suggested trade in pr
7 matches
Mail list logo
