Now that's the Frank we know and err ah ehh. love, I guess.
frank theriault wrote:
Distracting? From what?
-frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Boros Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PS> http://w
On Apr 9, 2004, at 1:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I do add one criticism. I agree with others that the shadows in the
canyon shot are a bit harsh. I tend to prefer taking that kind of
shot, where I
want shadows for definition, later in the day with softer shadows. Or
earlier, in
the morn
I was referring to an earlier post, where she commented more
extensively on the bathing suit picture.
By the way, I should have tried to get together with some of you SoCal
folks, but it's hard for me to plan ahead when I'm out there. I never
know when I'll have time off until the last minute or
I didn't see where Marnie indicated she found the beachwear shot offensive.
Her entire comment was "No comment on you know what."
I see (saw) nothing to apologize for in your California shots.
Of course, I see that all the time, living where I do, so it's nothing
new to me.
keith whaley
Paul Ste
Thanks Marnie,
I'm sorry you were offended by the shot of the young woman. However, I
suspect you were more offended by some of the slightly off-color
comments it provoked. I shoot some figure studies, very few of which
have been displayed here, and I find the human body to be a very
attractive
I think fill might affect some of the closer areas, but it would never
reach the top of the rocks and would render the shadows uneven. I did
brighten the shadows with the PS "shadows and highlights" tool, but
refrained from pumping them up a lot. Personally, I prefer the hard
light. It gives sh
In a message dated 4/6/2004 5:35:27 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2266884&size=lg
This is a terrific action shot. The way the water is cut, and the quieter
foam contrasted with the wilder spray. Good off-center composition too with
On 7/4/04,ERN discumbobulated:
>Beautiful girl? How can you tell?
Eleanour, you should know by now that most men only need glimpse the
briefest of skin and contour to be turned from modest, considerate chaps
into knuckle-dragging incoherents leaving a trail of soliva. I know - I
speak from vast e
Hello ernreed2,
etn> Beautiful girl? How can you tell?
By fractal analysys and 3D reconstruction, of course
Attila
For a big man, Paul's got a surprisingly tiny rear end.
-frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That was paul's underwear she was wearing!?! No wonder it
didn't f
> >From: Boros Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >PS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2249276&size=lg
> >Beautiful girl, but the cropped head is a bit distracting.
> >
>
> >
Beautiful girl? How can you tell?
The only thing apparent to me is that she must be awfully uncomfortable. What
I sat here for 10 minutes, trying to think of something witty for a
retort...
No matter what I thought of, if I'd have typed it, I'd have got meself
in trouble!
keith
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Cotty noted:
"I wonder if Paul,or anyone else for that matter,noticed all the "hot
pixels" in
Cotty noted:
"I wonder if Paul,or anyone else for that matter,noticed all the "hot
pixels" in that shot. Our was it just me.LOL
Notice how all the girls have gone very quiet at the moment?"
Well, what I'd like to know is Paul, why would you lie to the list as such
when you know that you snuck of
On 7/4/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] discumbobulated:
>I wonder if Paul,or anyone else for that matter,noticed all the "hot
>pixels" in that shot.
>
>Our was it just me.LOL
Notice how all the girls have gone very quiet at the moment?
Let the boys have their fun ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
tty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 07 April 2004 14:48
> > To: pentax list
> > Subject: Re[2]: I'm back...with new pics
> >
> >
> > On 7/4/04, ATTILA discumbobulated:
> >
> > >It is obviously not her head is the point of interest, b
Never mind front and side, what about top down and bottom up!
> -Original Message-
> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 April 2004 14:48
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Re[2]: I'm back...with new pics
>
>
> On 7/4/04, ATTILA discumbobulated:
On 7/4/04, ATTILA discumbobulated:
>It is obviously not her head is the point of interest, but I think it
>can't be just ignored. Her hair also looks nice. I like the photo but
>I think a full length shot would be even better.
And a few from the front and side as well.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
On 6/4/04, MY KINDA GUY discumbobulated:
>Hi folks,
>I'm back from my work trip to LA. Since I was off list for more than
>two weeks, I think I ought to show three PAWs. I shot a lot of frames,
>somewhere around 700. i like these three. They're very California. It
>wasn't the most work intensiv
I really like the composition of the canyon shot, and the fact that you
have chosen a time of day when the light has been just right to show
detail in the shadows without overwhelming the highlights.
The beach shot appeals for primarily non-photographic reasons, and I never
noticed the cut-off
11:13 AM
> To: Shel Belinkoff
> Subject: Re[2]: I'm back...with new pics
>
> Hello Shel,
>
> It is obviously not her head is the point of interest, but I think
> it
> can't be just ignored. Her hair also looks nice. I like the photo
> but
> I think a full length
Hello Shel,
It is obviously not her head is the point of interest, but I think it
can't be just ignored. Her hair also looks nice. I like the photo but
I think a full length shot would be even better.
Attila
Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 10:48:24 AM, you wrote:
SB> I don't think her head is at al
I don't think her head is at all relevant to the
photo. Gives a new meaning to getting one's draws into a
knot
Boros Attila wrote:
> PS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2249276&size=lg
> Beautiful girl, but the cropped head is a bit distracting.
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 3:34:17 AM, you wrote:
PS> Hi folks,
PS> I'm back from my work trip to LA. Since I was off list for more than
PS> two weeks, I think I ought to show three PAWs.
Wellcome back Paul, it sounds you had a nice trip. So these photos are
some sort of presentation o
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm back from my work trip to LA. Since I was off list for more than two
weeks, I think I ought to show three PAWs. I shot a lot of frames,
somewhere around 700. i like these three. They're very California. It
wasn't the most work intensive production I've ever
Thanks Tom. Your vote of confidence is deeply appreciated.
On Apr 6, 2004, at 9:19 PM, tom wrote:
I can always count on you.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 7:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I'm back...wit
I can always count on you.
tv
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 7:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: I'm back...with new pics
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2249276&size=lg
Hi folks,
I'm back from my work trip to LA. Since I was off list for more than
two weeks, I think I ought to show three PAWs. I shot a lot of frames,
somewhere around 700. i like these three. They're very California. It
wasn't the most work intensive production I've ever been on, so I had
my sh
27 matches
Mail list logo
