Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Paul Write this in TextEdit, save it as a plain TEXT file named "download.htm" http://users.skynet.be/thibouille/SG12.DNG";> file Open the file Safari, click on the link with the control key held down, and tell the browser to save it to the hard disk. The file will be transferred

Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Lawrence Kwan
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Adam Maas wrote: >> http://users.skynet.be/thibouille/SG12.DNG >> http://users.skynet.be/thibouille/SG12.JPG > Looking very good for such early firmware. Bit of CA, almost no bloom. Actually, this looks infinitely better than the 0.2 firmware K10D shots leaked in Pent

Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread jtainter
http://users.skynet.be/thibouille/SG12.DNG http://users.skynet.be/thibouille/SG12.JPG - This time Samsung got the lens mounted correctly, but the lens hood is upside down. Joe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Mark Roberts
Thibouille wrote: > > Strange that Pentax both forbid to write anything on a card and > disabled the button to detach the lens when Samsung allowed both... ;) It clearly shows which company has more experience dealing with pixel peepers! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http:/

Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Thibouille
No both Samsung and Pentax had 0.20 firmware... I checked ;) 2006/9/27, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Perhaps Pentax was showing an earlier development body not running a > usable firmware. > > -Adam > > > Thibouille wrote: > > LOL yes we joked about that ;) > > > > Strange that Pentax both for

Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Adam Maas
Perhaps Pentax was showing an earlier development body not running a usable firmware. -Adam Thibouille wrote: > LOL yes we joked about that ;) > > Strange that Pentax both forbid to write anything on a card and > disabled the button to detach the lens when Samsung allowed both... ;) > > 2006/

Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Thibouille
LOL yes we joked about that ;) Strange that Pentax both forbid to write anything on a card and disabled the button to detach the lens when Samsung allowed both... ;) 2006/9/27, Lucas Rijnders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Op Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:20:11 +0200 schreef Thibouille > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >

Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Lucas Rijnders
Op Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:20:11 +0200 schreef Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > http://users.skynet.be/thibouille/SG12.JPG Samsung are making progress in great strides: the lens is mounted correctly now. At the next tradeshow, they'll know how to mount the hood :o) -- Regards, Lucas --

Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Thibouille
Well the lighting inside such show is indeed very random not to say crappy. Lots of spots everywhere, shiny happy reflexions & all... ;) Anyway... I must have it. You will understand once you have one in your hands. Of course I wasn't able to judge image performance. But on every other points, I l

Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Adam Maas
Thibouille wrote: > The Pentax cameras had the write function disabled but not the Samsung ones :D > Fimware (both Pentax and Samsung) was v0.20. > Setting were RAW+JPEG (so the JPG comes directly out of the camera). > DNG is not compressed since RAR will shrink it further 3MB off the > 16.1MB of t

Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Paul Stenquist
I just couldn't download it. One of my browsers thought it was a text file, the other a quick time movie. But I did look at the jpeg. Interesting, but so preliminary. I saw only very minor CA, most of which could have been natural coloration at the edge of the table caused by lighting or reflec

Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 27/09/06, Antti-Pekka Virjonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Quite a lot of chromatic aberration but I don't really think > any image shot with pre-release versions count as a sample... That's a function of the lens not the camera firmware, it the DA12-24 at 24mm f4, not too bad for a wi

Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Thibouille
The DNG opened nicely in Lightroom beta 4 on my comp. 2006/9/27, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The DNG appears as a text file. But I got the jpeg. With firmware 0.2 > it's probably not even close to the production camera. But worth a > look. > Paul > On Sep 27, 2006, at 5:20 AM, Thibouille

Re: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Paul Stenquist
The DNG appears as a text file. But I got the jpeg. With firmware 0.2 it's probably not even close to the production camera. But worth a look. Paul On Sep 27, 2006, at 5:20 AM, Thibouille wrote: > The Pentax cameras had the write function disabled but not the Samsung > ones :D > Fimware (both P

RE: K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Hi, Quite a lot of chromatic aberration but I don't really think any image shot with pre-release versions count as a sample... Antti-Pekka Antti-Pekka Virjonen Computec Oy R&D Turku www.computec.fi -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http

K10D/GX-10 DNG file here (link) +JPEG

2006-09-27 Thread Thibouille
The Pentax cameras had the write function disabled but not the Samsung ones :D Fimware (both Pentax and Samsung) was v0.20. Setting were RAW+JPEG (so the JPG comes directly out of the camera). DNG is not compressed since RAR will shrink it further 3MB off the 16.1MB of these. ISO200, 12mm (DA12-24