On Dec 12, 2011, at 05:26 , P. J. Alling wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 3:41 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:24 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>>>
I take it that it's specially designed for the MZ-D, (or K-1 as it was
rebrande
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:48:26PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
> John Francis wrote:
>
> >My PZ-1p has exactly the same set of contacts as my K-5.
> >
> >The digital signals flowing over the signal path may be different,
> >but the physical electrical interface is the same.
>
> Are there digital s
John Francis wrote:
>My PZ-1p has exactly the same set of contacts as my K-5.
>
>The digital signals flowing over the signal path may be different,
>but the physical electrical interface is the same.
Are there digital signals involved? My understanding has always been
that the PZ contacts never s
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:45:46AM -0500, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: "P. J. Alling"
>
> >On 12/12/2011 8:44 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
> >>>On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> >>>
> On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:24 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
> >I take it that it's specially desig
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 08:44:09AM -0500, John Sessoms wrote:
> >On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> >
> >>On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:24 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> >>
> >>>I take it that it's specially designed for the MZ-D, (or K-1 as
> >>>it was rebranded by Pentax marketing in Japan or
From: "P. J. Alling"
On 12/12/2011 8:44 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:24 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I take it that it's specially designed for the MZ-D, (or K-1 as
it was rebranded by Pentax marketing in Japan or maybe somebody
On 12/12/2011 8:44 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:24 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I take it that it's specially designed for the MZ-D, (or K-1 as
it was rebranded by Pentax marketing in Japan or maybe somebody
else).
What I don't u
On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:24 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I take it that it's specially designed for the MZ-D, (or K-1 as
it was rebranded by Pentax marketing in Japan or maybe somebody
else).
What I don't understand is why the optical stabilization w
From: Larry Colen
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:24 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I take it that it's specially designed for the MZ-D, (or K-1 as it
was rebranded by Pentax marketing in Japan or maybe somebody
else).
What I don't understand is why the optical stabilization would not
work with film DSLRs.
From: Igor Roshchin
It's kind of funny:
This description of Sigma 70-200/2.8 (for Pentax!) says that the lens is
"Optimized for Pentax Full-Frame DSLRs":
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/833526-REG/Sigma__70_200mm_f_2_8_EX_DG.html/
Also, I wonder, if there is indeed and optical stabilizer
On 12/12/2011 3:41 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:24 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I take it that it's specially designed for the MZ-D, (or K-1 as it was
rebranded by Pentax marketing in Japan or maybe somebody else).
What I don't un
On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:24 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>> I take it that it's specially designed for the MZ-D, (or K-1 as it was
>> rebranded by Pentax marketing in Japan or maybe somebody else).
>
> What I don't understand is why the optical
On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:24 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> I take it that it's specially designed for the MZ-D, (or K-1 as it was
> rebranded by Pentax marketing in Japan or maybe somebody else).
What I don't understand is why the optical stabilization would not work with
film DSLRs.
>
> On 12/12/
I take it that it's specially designed for the MZ-D, (or K-1 as it was
rebranded by Pentax marketing in Japan or maybe somebody else).
On 12/12/2011 12:50 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
It's kind of funny:
This description of Sigma 70-200/2.8 (for Pentax!) says that the lens is
"Optimized for Pentax
It's kind of funny:
This description of Sigma 70-200/2.8 (for Pentax!) says that the lens is
"Optimized for Pentax Full-Frame DSLRs":
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/833526-REG/Sigma__70_200mm_f_2_8_EX_DG.html/
Also, I wonder, if there is indeed and optical stabilizer in the Pentax
version.
15 matches
Mail list logo