On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, wendy beard wrote:
> >etc. bodies?
>
> Yuk?
>
> I had an MZ-M for about two weeks. Ran a couple of films through it and
> couldn't think of any reason to keep it when I had a couple of perfectly
> good MXes at home.
> It was so light, I had to weight it down with an A35-105 be
Pretty much they way I look at it.
At 09:16 PM 1/2/2003 +1100, you wrote:
The difference between cameras and disposables
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Not in my experience, you should be able to pick up a new ZX-M for about
> $160 US.
> I've not s
The MZ-M is not a replacement for the old manual
bodies IMHO but it does make a great little back up
camera for an AF body, I miss my MZ-M Alot to,
thankfully the student who has it is taking good care
of it.
__
Post your free a
The difference between cameras and disposables
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Not in my experience, you should be able to pick up a new ZX-M for about
> $160 US.
> I've not seen a ME Super for less than about $200, although prices have
been
> falling
riginal Message-
From: wendy beard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MZ-M owners/users opinions?
At 05:38 PM 01/01/2003 -0500, Dave wrote:
>Folks...
>
>I've been considering getting a body to use with my beauti
It's adequate for the purpose, I have one for times when I want a camera
which can use interchangeable lenses, but I don't want to risk an LX or MX.
I'm not in love with the camera, in my opinion it's viewfinder is barely
adequate a bit "squinty", with low magnification and low apparent brightness
"David Chang-Sang" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks...
I've been considering getting a body to use with my beautiful 50mm f1.4
SMC-M. I was looking at the MZ-M used. What do you all have to say for this
baby compared to the older MX/K1000/K2 etc. bodies? any experiences for
those who own an MZ-M?
At 05:38 PM 01/01/2003 -0500, Dave wrote:
Folks...
I've been considering getting a body to use with my beautiful 50mm f1.4
SMC-M.
I was looking at the MZ-M used.
What do you all have to say for this baby compared to the older MX/K1000/K2
etc. bodies?
Yuk?
I had an MZ-M for about two weeks. Ran
Amen, Brother Robb.
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 10:03 pm, William Robb wrote:
> The m 50mm f/1.4 is very nice on the ME-Super.
--
Ken Archer Canine Photography
San Antonio, Texas
"Business Is Going To The Dogs"
9 matches
Mail list logo