Re: My first in-depth review of a lens published

On 2/16/2011 3:16 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: Actually, I use some of the features like the lens reviews. I'm just to lazy (and too easily annoyed) to sift through the posts for useful information. Thanks, Steven. I'd take it as a faint praise /grin/. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: My first in-depth review of a lens published

You may be right, Jostein. It is just that in principle I should have been able to provide full size JPGs and I don't have those for my film images shot with FA 20. And words without images won't do much good. Also it seems to me, that PentaxForums is somewhat digital-centristic, so to say. B

Re: My first in-depth review of a lens published

Actually, I use some of the features like the lens reviews. I'm just to lazy (and too easily annoyed) to sift through the posts for useful information. On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:13 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: > Hi! > > Though PentaxForums does not seem to be in big favor here, I did participate >

Re: My first in-depth review of a lens published

Since you point out its convenience for film, perhaps you should have included some words on performance in the gelatine world? The "aberrations" rating would probably look quite different because of the lens' droplet distortion towards the corners, for example. Sample variation was also a big issu

My first in-depth review of a lens published

Hi! Though PentaxForums does not seem to be in big favor here, I did participate in the recent round of user in-depth reviews over there. So here it is: my first published review: http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax_fa_20mm_review.php There are few misprints that I hope will be hammer