Ken Waller wrote:
>Mark, I almost didn't make the font size comment as I didn't want to be
>negative about anything related to the book in deference to all the time &
>work you and your cohorts had put into it, but since others have chimed in I
>feel better about having done so.
>
>Still a very
rk to show off the efforts of the members - thanks again
& again & again
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: My observations on the 2011 PDML ANnual
David J Brooks wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:14 AM, wrote:
>>
>> If there was one thing I'd change in the 2011 Annual it would be the size of
>> the font - I find it a little hard to read with my old eyes!
>
>Same here. I had a hard time reading some of the items.
All right. Lemme tell ya
On Apr 23, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
> Thanks, Larry. Very kind of you to say so. Big cheers, Christine
Not kind, just observant.
:-)
>
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pd
Thanks, Larry. Very kind of you to say so. Big cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 4:53 AM
Subject: Re: My observations on the 2011 PDML ANnual
On Apr 22, 2011, at 9:14
Thanks, Brian. Very kind of you to say so. Big cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Walters"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: My observations on the 2011 PDML ANnual
Ken
You've pretty mu
n talk your ear off! And I did take many pictures at the
museum--but just playful stuff--the kind an aunt would take. :-)
Big thanks, Ken. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From:
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 11:14 PM
Subject: My
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:14 AM, wrote:
> Have reviewed the annual several time since I received it, and have come up
> with several observations
>
> * Another great job by Mark - your organizational and stylistic abilities
> are wonderful - thank you very much for the effort (and the efforts of
On Apr 22, 2011, at 9:14 PM,
wrote:
> Have reviewed the annual several time since I received it, and have come up
> with several observations
>
> * Another great job by Mark - your organizational and stylistic abilities are
> wonderful - thank you very much for the effort (and the efforts o
Ken
You've pretty much summed up my reactions as well, and my wife Margaret
also commented on the standard of Doug's preface.
The layout and format of the book is just about perfect, although I
agree a slightly larger font would be appreciated by my aging eyes.
There are perhaps half a dozen page
Have reviewed the annual several time since I received it, and have come up
with several observations
* Another great job by Mark - your organizational and stylistic abilities
are wonderful - thank you very much for the effort (and the efforts of Doug
Brewer, Scott Loveless, Bill Robb & Miscre
11 matches
Mail list logo
