John Francis wrote:
> Don't you believe it. Note that this was a 120-300/f2.8, not f/4.
> It would probably weigh about as much as all the lenses you list.
Well, since it would displace the 200/2.8 and 300/4.5, and get me to
f/2.8 for focal lengths I don't currently have it, I'd probably put up
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 07:32:09PM -0500, Doug Franklin wrote:
> Patrick Genovese wrote:
> > Yes [a DFA 120-300 f2.8] would be like carting a howitzer
>
> Since my normal "at the track" kit contains the Pentax 16-45/4,
> 50-200/?, 200/2.8 and 300/4.5, plus a Sigma 400/5.6, a monopod, and
> other
That's a neat gizmo ...
I'll keep one of those in mind if I experience a change of life and
find myself buying a Pentax FA*600mm lens sometime! ;-)
G
On Jan 31, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Patrick Genovese wrote:
> I use a gadget similar to the Novoflex forked joint on a tripod.
> See here http://www.no
How about Manfrotto 393, the "poor mans Winberley"?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Patrick Genovese
Sent: 31. januar 2007 22:30
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: "New&q
Patrick Genovese wrote:
> Yes [a DFA 120-300 f2.8] would be like carting a howitzer
Since my normal "at the track" kit contains the Pentax 16-45/4,
50-200/?, 200/2.8 and 300/4.5, plus a Sigma 400/5.6, a monopod, and
other stuff, I doubt that a DFA 120-300 would bother me much. ;-)
--
Thanks,
Do
I use a gadget similar to the Novoflex forked joint on a tripod.
See here http://www.novoflex.com/english/html/products.htm i mount it
a rotating plate. The nice thing about this approach is that you
do'nt need a tripod collar on the lens and you simply lift the lens
off to shoot handheld.
Mine i
There must be a whole lot more people shooting birds and cats at a
distance than I do, or who have incredibly stable hands. I find even
using 135-200mm takes a lot of concentration and effort to hold still
enough, even with SR, to satisfy my desire for sharpness, and I'm
usually backing awa
Yes it would be like carting a howitzer around but damn useful i used
the sigma 120-300 on a n...n D200 and its a nice combo and very nice
zoom range for shooting sports with 1.5x focal length crop.
I'm willing to pay the weight penalty for the functionality. I like
compact gear but i;m not one t
Do you know how heavy a DFA 120-300 f2.8 would be? I'd end up never
taking it with me.
I'd be really happy with a sharp 250mm f4 on a K10D.
--
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
Patrick Genovese wrote:
> You know what would be really really really nice a pent
You know what would be really really really nice a pentax 135-400
f/4.5 it would make a great pair with the upcoming 50-135 f/2.8...
the 60-250 is a bit of a compromise ...had it been a 120-300 or maybe
350 it would be a much better fit in Pentax' lens line. a 120-300
f/2.8 would be lovely especial
Hi Patrick,
I've been watching this thread with interest as I'm looking for a good
200mm+ zoom. I've always thought the 70-200 f2.8 was too heavy and not
quite long enough. I've seen some really nice pictures from the Sigma
100-300, but I've seen some with very annoying bokeh too that have pu
Thanks for the info... I was hoping that someone would trash at least
one of the combos making my decision easier :-) The problem with
Malta is that you have to buy almost on faith... There is no way i'm
going to be able to try out a 70-200 f/2.8 or a 100-300.. unless I go
abroad.
Regards
Patri
77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Bruce
Dayton
Sendt: 30. januar 2007 19:12
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: "New" T/C's?
I have the Sigma 100-300/4 and the Sigma 1.4X EX comb
"Quite good" is right. Nice resolution in all cases.
Thanks, Bruce, for the input.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the Sigma 100-300/4 and the Sigma 1.4X EX combination. It is
> quite good. The lens is very nice and works well with the converter.
>
> This entire galle
I have the Sigma 100-300/4 and the Sigma 1.4X EX combination. It is
quite good. The lens is very nice and works well with the converter.
This entire gallery was shot with that combination:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/Galleries/Blue%20Angels/index.htm
I have used the Kenko 1.5 SHX and the Tamron
RATS!
J
--- John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 07:41:59AM -0800, Jack Davis wrote:
> > I'm braced for the 60~250 USM price, which I'm afraid, will be
> scary.
> > That may make your decision easy. 8-0
> > I believe I read awhile back that the intended availability d
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 07:41:59AM -0800, Jack Davis wrote:
> I'm braced for the 60~250 USM price, which I'm afraid, will be scary.
> That may make your decision easy. 8-0
> I believe I read awhile back that the intended availability date of
> three USM lenses was this March.(?)
Since revised; onl
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:17:36 +0100, Patrick Genovese wrote:
>Talking of T/Cs I've been debating whether to wait for the 60 - 250 or
>get the sigma 70-200 f/2.8 + 1.4x TC combo or possibly the 100-300 f/4
>+ 1.4x TC
>
>I know that the 70-200 f/2.8 enjoys a good reputation but i know
>n
The Sigma EX 100-300 f/4 is a fantastic lens. I haven't used it with a tc though
On 1/30/07, Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Talking of T/Cs I've been debating whether to wait for the 60 - 250 or
> get the sigma 70-200 f/2.8 + 1.4x TC combo or possibly the 100-300 f/4
> + 1.4x TC
>
>
I'm braced for the 60~250 USM price, which I'm afraid, will be scary.
That may make your decision easy. 8-0
I believe I read awhile back that the intended availability date of
three USM lenses was this March.(?)
Jack
--- Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Talking of T/Cs I've been deba
Neither, was my intent, but "USM" (ultra-sonic). I'm in yet another
fumble fingers mode...(sigh)
Jack
--- Jan van Wijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:21:48 -0800 (PST), Jack Davis wrote:
>
> >Am hankering for the yet to be released 60~250 UCM and an "L"
> quality
> >T/C. Any
Talking of T/Cs I've been debating whether to wait for the 60 - 250 or
get the sigma 70-200 f/2.8 + 1.4x TC combo or possibly the 100-300 f/4
+ 1.4x TC
I know that the 70-200 f/2.8 enjoys a good reputation but i know
nothing about their t/c... Any opinions on the combination ?
What about the 100-
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:21:48 -0800 (PST), Jack Davis wrote:
>Am hankering for the yet to be released 60~250 UCM and an "L" quality
>T/C. Any rumblings of a development or release schedule for such?
Not that I know of.
I would love to see a new high quality 1.4x converter too,
would be real nice
Am hankering for the yet to be released 60~250 UCM and an "L" quality
T/C. Any rumblings of a development or release schedule for such?
Jack
Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com
24 matches
Mail list logo
