On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 02:02 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I've found that almost any general purpose developer, like HC-110, will
provide good results with almost all BW films. I'd bet they
overdeveloped it. That'll give you contrasty and heavy for sure.
Sorry to chime in so late on
Aaron,
I have sent the negative off to Shel, and hopefully he can ascertain
whether it was overdeveloped or not. After that, I may be able to
find out from the lab more specifics. I'll keep you posted.
Thanks,
Bruce
Tuesday, April 23, 2002, 3:58:24 PM, you wrote:
AR On Tuesday, April
I use a lot of APX 100.
James Adams wrote:
I've just bought a roll of Agfapan APX 100 Pro 120 film to try out my
Ricohflex TLR camera. Has anyone used Agfapan APX Pro film?
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
Send it on ...
PO Box 1489
El Cerrito CA 94530-4489
BTW, APX 400 is a pretty grainy film with, I think, great tonality. I'd
not use it with HC-110, but, with larger negs, the results practically
glow with Rodinal 1:100. For most of the photography I do, APX 100 with
Rodinal 1:100 gives superb
James,
I have shot one roll of the 400 speed. What I got back from my lab
was not a pretty sight. It seemed to be very contrasty and heavy
looking. Not at all what I expected. I have since found out that
they develop with Kodak HC-110 Dilution B. I don't know how
compatible it is with that.
Shel,
If it's ok, I'll send a 6X7 neg and one of their prints so you can see
how they did.
Bruce
Monday, April 22, 2002, 8:29:34 PM, you wrote:
SB Send it on ...
SB PO Box 1489
SB El Cerrito CA 94530-4489
SB BTW, APX 400 is a pretty grainy film with, I think, great tonality. I'd
SB not
It's the only film I have used in my Yashica D tlr. I really like it
quite a bit and haven't seen any reason to try anything different, at
least in 120 format.
35mm, that's a different story (I have 4 different bw films loaded
right now in various cameras) but I use it quite a bit here too
Sure ... it'll be an education. I'll try a print with both the
condenser and the dichro heads. Do you know on what paper/grade the
print was made? It's possible your lab just used the wrong grade of
paper.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Shel,
If it's ok, I'll send a 6X7 neg and one of their prints
SB Bruce Dayton wrote:
I have shot one roll of the 400 speed. What I got back from my lab
was not a pretty sight. It seemed to be very contrasty and heavy
looking. Not at all what I expected. I have since found out that
they develop with Kodak HC-110 Dilution B. I don't know
Paul,
Well a neg a print are going out in the mail to Shel today, so he can
give me an idea of what happened.
Bruce
Monday, April 22, 2002, 11:02:55 PM, you wrote:
SB Bruce Dayton wrote:
I have shot one roll of the 400 speed. What I got back from my lab
was not a pretty sight.
I've just bought a roll of Agfapan APX 100 Pro 120 film to try out my
Ricohflex TLR camera. Has anyone used Agfapan APX Pro film?
James
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
11 matches
Mail list logo
