On 26 Sep 2002 at 21:18, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
Change of subject just in case the post got lost in the noise:
There has been a longish thread on a professional photographer's digital
forum and their comments are similar: Digital must be treated like slide,
and not print film when it comes
For me, the biggest give away that something was shot with a direct to
digital camera is that the image looks a little flat. I'm not used to
seeing so much detail in the highlights and shadows. To make things look
more like film I apply a bit of a S curve with Curves in PS. Having the
option to
On 26 Sep 2002 at 21:18, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
There has been a longish thread on a professional photographer's digital
forum and their comments are similar: Digital must be treated like slide,
and not print film when it comes to exposure - don't blow out the
highlights. It's easy to check
It appears that in recent comparisons film has been downgraded from earlier
estimates of either 70 or 40 megs (I recall both numbers at different
times). There might be a confusion over capture resolution and resultant
file size, and it would be helpful if the writers of these essays could be
On 26 Sep 2002 at 21:18, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
There has been a longish thread on a professional photographer's digital
forum and their comments are similar: Digital must be treated like slide,
and not print film when it comes to exposure - don't blow out the
highlights. It's easy to check
On 26 Sep 2002 at 21:18, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
There has been a longish thread on a professional photographer's digital
forum and their comments are similar: Digital must be treated like slide,
and not print film when it comes to exposure - don't blow out the
highlights. It's easy to check
Shadow detail may be there but, from everything I have seen, it is full
of SERIOUS noise.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 September 2002 02:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: OT: D1s review
There has been a longish thread
I don't see how anyone could conclude that 35mm film is still a superior
media after seeing these pictures.
-R
Mike Ignatiev wrote:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/1ds/1ds-field.shtml
A pretty impressive comparison 35mm vs 645 vs Canon D1s -- seems like D1s is a
I don't see how anyone could conclude that 35mm film is still a superior
media after seeing these pictures.
-R [Ryan K. Brooks]
Maybe because there are considerations for some of us other than absolute
image quality. Even if you don't agree, other perspectives shouldn't be
inconceivable.
agree. money is definitely one of them :)
mishka
-Original Message-
From: Robert Soames Wetmore
Subject: Re: OT: D1s review
I don't see how anyone could conclude that 35mm film is still a superior
media after seeing these pictures.
-R [Ryan K. Brooks]
Maybe because
I'd like to see how well it performs at ISO 800 and above.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Ryan K. Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 9:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: D1s review
I don't see how anyone could conclude that 35mm film
Probably poorly.
At 10:59 AM 9/26/2002 -0400, you wrote:
I'd like to see how well it performs at ISO 800 and above.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Ryan K. Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 9:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: D1s
From: Ryan K. Brooks
I don't see how anyone could conclude that 35mm film is still
a superior
media after seeing these pictures.
One of the great failings of this, imo, is that we see pictures
from completely different mediums and think we are making a
valid comparison.
Unfortunately, the
Mike,
The one tricky thing about these comparisons is how much image
manipulation the camera software is doing. Things like sharpening and
contrast changes. It is very hard to do an apples to apples
comparison. Expertly applied sharping can do wonders for an image
especially as you size it up
Ryan,
Aside from the inability on the web to really show things well (how
were the files doctored for display at various sizes, etc), one huge
factor for film is the ability to pick various types of films - wide
latitude, narrow latitude, chromes, negs, various saturations,
corrections for skin
There has been a longish thread on a professional photographer's digital
forum and their comments are similar: Digital must be treated like slide,
and not print film when it comes to exposure - don't blow out the
highlights. It's easy to check the histogram in the camera to make sure.
Shadow
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT: D1s review
Probably poorly.
At 10:59 AM 9/26/2002 -0400, you wrote:
I'd like to see how well it performs at ISO 800 and above.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Ryan K. Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 9:25 AM
17 matches
Mail list logo