OT: Epson R800 or R1800

2006-10-11 Thread Eactivist
My Epson 925 is getting a bit elderly. Still works fine but technology has passed it by. I am contemplating entering a local art show. Various types of art, but also one can enter photography. It's a show/sale actually, I'd have to pay $10 for six feet of wall, which strikes me as not bad. A

Re: OT: Epson R800 or R1800

2006-10-11 Thread Mat Maessen
On 10/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My Epson 925 is getting a bit elderly. Still works fine but technology has passed it by. Heh, I know the feeling. Anyone have experience with the R1800? Or the R800? Do you like it? What do you like? What do you not like? My local

Re: OT: Epson R800 or R1800

2006-10-11 Thread Paul Sorenson
Marnie - I have the R800 and am very happy w/it. I seldom have the need to print anything larger than 8x10, so it fits my needs well I haven't branched out into papers other than the Epson series so I can't report how it works w/other vendors papers. Epson just updated the paper profiles

Re: OT: Epson R800 or R1800

2006-10-11 Thread Adam Maas
I've compared prints from the R800 to my R320. They're indistinguishable (On Premium Luster paper with Epson ink). I'd not bother with either the R800 or 1800. Get a 220 or 320 for 8.5x11 and the R2400 for larger. -Adam Paul Sorenson wrote: Marnie - I have the R800 and am very happy w/it.