A couple of hours ago I wrote,
Bruce R. still lurks here as you've discovered, but we don't hear so much
Nikon uber alles as we once did.
Since, and without checking my mail to see if anyone actually has taken
offence, I realised that I had unintentionally alluded to a repugnant
ideology. I
My knowledge of German is limited to subtitles in old war movies, but it only looks
like what you wrote means something like Nikon rules all. I don't think that putting
that in German makes it offensive; although I do understand the inference. So no
offense taken, no apologies needed.
It
Thanks for understanding, Bruce.
As for Pentax Sucks, apparently a lot of Pentax diehards feel the same at
present. It might be all about the glass, but you gotta hang the glass on
something, after all.
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My knowledge
Actually his Nikon mania isn't what got to me, it was that he was
extremely insulting when
he wanted to be, and sometimes when he didn't. If you ignored this when
he was trying
he resorted to name calling, and expletives. Butch is just forgetting
how long he's been here.
I don't remember the
Hi,
Friday, July 16, 2004, 12:51:58 PM, Anthony wrote:
A couple of hours ago I wrote,
Bruce R. still lurks here as you've discovered, but we don't hear so much
Nikon uber alles as we once did.
Since, and without checking my mail to see if anyone actually has taken
offence, I realised
You posted it on the Pentax Deranged Mailing List
BR
From: Anthony Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How on earth did my very mild observation about BR, and subsequent apology
for a careless allusion, warp into another insultfest.
I also know how to trim my responses.
BR
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at least Bruce
has the ability to stay on topic. (Now that was an insult).
essentially come to an end.
The list isn't dying.
It just got a tummy ache for a while...
keith whaley
-Original Message-
From: Jostein[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15/07/04 08:14:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT:The PDML is Dying
You're right, Paul
Sure hope you're right, Keith. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The list isn't dying.
It just got a tummy ache for a while...
keith whaley
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:42:33 +0200, Jostein wrote:
Sure hope you're right, Keith. :-)
It's happened several times in the nearly six years I've been on the
list.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Jostein wrote:
Sure hope you're right, Keith. :-)
Jostein
[...me too!]
keith
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The list isn't dying.
It just got a tummy ache for a while...
keith whaley
Can't we get back to what this list does best: debate
the merits of various computer operating systems?
Chaso
The list has become insane. The evidence is there for
all to read. We've suffered a series of horrific
off-topic flame wars. Apparently, this latest
religious, political, philosophical
Chaso DeChaso wrote:
Can't we get back to what this list does best: debate
the merits of various computer operating systems?
Chaso
HAR!
Stephen
Yes and no.
When I came into the list 2-3 years ago the Who was making his exit, debate
as to whether the PZ-1p or the MZ-S was the better camera was common. The
full frame 6 MP DSLR was still in the works, soon to be killed. There was a
lot of discussion of which lenses were better then which
Piss off.
From: Butch Black
Bruce R. came and went.
On 15/7/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, offered:
Piss off.
From: Butch Black
Bruce R. came and went.
YO! Bruce!
respect
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Hah, ha, ha...
Always a man of a few well-chosen words, right?
Whadda guy!
You're a kick, Brucey lad...
keith whaley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Piss off.
From: Butch Black
Bruce R. came and went.
Hi,
Piss off.
From: Butch Black
Bruce R. came and went.
YO! Bruce!
respect
I just can't think who he reminds me of...
http://www.bbcprograms.com/pbs/catalog/fatherted/images/0103fted.jpg
Drink! Arse! Feck! Girls!
--
Cheers,
Bob
The list has become insane. The evidence is there for all to read.
We've suffered a series of horrific off-topic flame wars.
It happens, I suspect, anytime Pentax goes too long with a new product
for us to ponder, query each other about, and debate the merits of.
Pentax: Fulfill your parental
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Re: OT:The PDML is Dying
The list has become insane. The evidence is there for all to read.
We've suffered a series of horrific off-topic flame wars.
It happens, I suspect, anytime Pentax goes too long with a new
product
for us
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Joseph Tainter wrote:
It happens, I suspect, anytime Pentax goes too long with a new product
for us to ponder, query each other about, and debate the merits of.
We just got the DA 14/2.8 and the new Optio MX and there are rumors
about the new digital SLR coming in the fall.
On Jul 15, 2004, at 6:15 PM, alex wetmore wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Joseph Tainter wrote:
It happens, I suspect, anytime Pentax goes too long with a new product
for us to ponder, query each other about, and debate the merits of.
We just got the DA 14/2.8 and the new Optio MX and there are rumors
On 15 Jul 2004 at 19:07, Joseph Tainter wrote:
It happens, I suspect, anytime Pentax goes too long with a new product
for us to ponder, query each other about, and debate the merits of.
I feel it's actually the opposite. The new products seem to have drawn new
people with alternative POVs to
It happens, I suspect, anytime Pentax goes too long with a new product
for us to ponder, query each other about, and debate the merits of.
I feel it's actually the opposite. The new products seem to have drawn
new people with alternative POVs to the PDML. Just as talk of the new
products have
The list has become insane. The evidence is there for all to read.
We've suffered a series of horrific off-topic flame wars. Apparently,
this latest religious, political, philosophical flame war was initiated
by my referencing a few rather tame nudes that I had posted on one of
my own web
In some respects, Paul, I have to agree. Even though I was out of
town for the past week and a half (still receiving pdml mail), I didn't see much to
comment on. Those who join the flames can't seem to let well enough
alone. When there is not a right or wrong side to the debate, just
a
Seems you don't remember the Mafud wars. Those were if anything worse.
Part of the problem is that some of the
newcomers on the list don't realize the diversity of this community we
are, and that we have long ago learned to live with
our differences. The list is no more insane today than it
Hi!
PS The list has become insane. The evidence is there for all to read.
PS We've suffered a series of horrific off-topic flame wars. Apparently,
PS this latest religious, political, philosophical flame war was initiated
PS by my referencing a few rather tame nudes that I had posted on one of
PS
I remember the Mafud wars quite well. They were antagonistic and
virile, yet not so personal as the recent conflagrations. No one spoke
of kill-filing members. Disagreement was rampant, yet not as personal
as it is today. And I'm not speaking of my personal experience.
Although I posted the
Make that antagonistic and viral.
On Jul 14, 2004, at 11:32 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I remember the Mafud wars quite well. They were antagonistic and
virile, yet not so personal as the recent conflagrations. No one spoke
of kill-filing members. Disagreement was rampant, yet not as personal
as
30 matches
Mail list logo
