Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-25 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi ... Sometimes the scanning times can be a lot slower, at least that's what I read recently. I don't know if the Minolta allows for either SCSI or USB, or just USB, but for now USB is acceptable as I won't have to upgrade my old hand-cranked computer with a SCSI card, which is what I'd have to

Re: What printer? (Was: Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner)

2002-01-25 Thread David Brooks
My S800 prints at 1200x2400 and i'm very happy with it Dave Begin Original Message From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:49:23 + To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: What printer? (Was: Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner) &

What printer? (Was: Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner)

2002-01-25 Thread Cotty
>This sounds quite good, but what printer to print at 2800 dpi? >I have look at the epson 1290 an it is exactly what I need but >it prints at only 1440 :( >I think Canon have a printer that does 2880, but without the features >of the Epson The current issue of AP has reviews of the new Canon 900

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-25 Thread Cotty
>Bruce pointed out that one of the new Minolta scanners has similar specs >to the LS-1000, and more features, with a price comparable to the used >Nikon I'm considering. It'll run with a USB port, so I don't need and >SCSI stuff, which I'd need with the Nikon, which is also a bonus, >because I'd l

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi Bruce ... Nice shot! How many kids do you have - 3? As nice as the shot is, it's only marginally helpful since it's done on chromogenic B&W. I'm really interested in seeing scans made on regular B&W neg film. Gedfrey's got a few on the Minolta test pages I posted earlier. Bruce Dayton wro

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi Bruce ... I found a site with some scans made with the Minolta. In case you're interested: http://www.bayarea.net/~ramarren/photostuff/mintest/minolta-test.htm The scanner is looking better and better as an entry level unit. I'm going to look at your PUG entry now. Yeah, you should have

Re[2]: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Bruce Dayton
Kevin, Don't forget that you are scanning a 1 X 1.5 inch piece of film. Unless you only want contact prints, you will start using the resolution as you blow up the image. Bruce Dayton Thursday, January 24, 2002, 7:59:32 PM, you wrote: >> > For what it is worth, the Minolta Scan Dual II can

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Paul Stenquist
The printer dpi ratings have absolutely nothing in common with scanner ratings. The Epson 1290 will do a magnificent job of printing scans from this Minolta. In fact, the 1290 will do even better if you can scan at 4000 dpi. The printer ratings are only a reference to the steps of the printhead. T

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
0 ppi, which is then printed at the 1440 or 2880 dpi by means of the printer driver. Maris - Original Message - From: "Kevin Waterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:59 PM Subject: Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner | &g

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
iginal Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:33 PM Subject: Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner | Hi Paul ... | | At the moment I'm not looking to make prints, just to learn scanning and | get some

Re[2]: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Bruce Dayton
Shel, I have done a few rolls. My entry in the current PUG was done on it. If you want, I can look back and see if I have anything else to show you. You'd think with all my computer work, I would have a website, but, alas, I only get around to things as demand rears it's ugly head. I'm sure tha

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Kevin Waterson
> > For what it is worth, the Minolta Scan Dual II can scan up to 6 frames > > at a time automatically. The cost new on this unit is under $400 and > > runs on USB. It scans at 2800 dpi. Batch scanning is one of the > > reasons I bought it. This sounds quite good, but what printer to print at 2

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread John Mustarde
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 10:37:58 -0800, you wrote: >Does anyone have experience with the LS 1000? What can you tell me >about it? I have the LS-30, which has a film holder much like the LS-1000. The film holder scans one-at-a-time, requiring removal and repositioning between each scan. Even gettin

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Thanks for the information, Bruce. See my note in reply to Paul's message - the Minolta seems like a good alternative to the LS-1000. Have you done any B&W neg scans with it? Are they up somewhere? Bruce Dayton wrote: > For what it is worth, the Minolta Scan Dual II can scan up to 6 frames >

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi Paul ... At the moment I'm not looking to make prints, just to learn scanning and get some more photos on to my web site. I've been practicing with a Coolscan 4000 - that's the one you suggested - and I'm leaning in that direction for the upgrade. But, until I know better how it, and a coupl

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Thanks for the pointer. I'll watch that auction until I learn a little more about my options. CBWaters wrote: > From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 6:21

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Shel Belinkoff
So it's one negative at a time, then? H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In response to your follow up question, you cannot scan > a whole negative strip automatically. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ - This message is from the Pentax-Discu

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
sage - From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:53 PM Subject: Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner | >Have you used it for B&W negs? | | Sorry to answer in bits. I scan B&W all the time in 8 bit, e

Re: Re[2]: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread CBWaters
- Original Message - From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 6:21 PM Subject: Re[2]: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner > Shel, > > For what it is worth, the Minolta Scan Du

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Nick Wright
About 13 seconds to startup the software (Nikon software), 23 seconds for a preview, and about 55 seconds for the final scan at a size of 5x7 inches and 200dpi; is slow to me. Granted this is an older powermac 180 with not enough RAM. There is no batch scanning, it's one at a time. :P Oh, and I go

Re[2]: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Bruce Dayton
Shel, For what it is worth, the Minolta Scan Dual II can scan up to 6 frames at a time automatically. The cost new on this unit is under $400 and runs on USB. It scans at 2800 dpi. Batch scanning is one of the reasons I bought it. Bruce Dayton Thursday, January 24, 2002, 2:39:12 PM, you wr

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Treena Harp
ROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:28 PM Subject: Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner > I use the LS-1000 on a daily basis here at the paper > that I work at. It is a good scanner, slow for my > needs; but the scans are very good. I've scanned all &

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Cotty
>How would you define/describe "slow"? Can I scan a strip of negatives >with the scanner set on automatic? Have you used it for B&W negs? Whoa! Hold on now, this is the baby of the range. It scans one frame at a time, and you manually remove the film hoder, manually select another frame by mo

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Cotty
>Have you used it for B&W negs? Sorry to answer in bits. I scan B&W all the time in 8 bit, er 256 shades of grey. That gives a file size of about 8 MB at 2700 dpi. Others have scanned B&W in 'color' but I don't understand why, removing the colour info in Photoshop does the same thing and remov

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Cotty
>How would you define "slow"? Good to know you think highly of the unit. Actually, I have boobd there. I've just remembered it was slow(er) with an older Mac I was using with it. But I have recently acquired a 'Blue and White' G3, and I noticed scanning seems that bit quicker, especially at f

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Cotty
Hi Shel, I have the LS-1000 as my only neg scanner. I find it a very capable unit, if a lttile slow by today's standards. 2700dpi optical is nothing to sniff at, and will easily give 25 MB files sizes (colour) from 35mm frames. The neg holder is a bit fiddly, but at least most of it is metal

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:37 PM Subject: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner | I've a chance to get a well-maintained Nikon LS 1000 scanner at a | reasonable price. I've decided that, for my first scanner, I want | something inexpensive while I sort out

Re: OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Nick Wright
I use the LS-1000 on a daily basis here at the paper that I work at. It is a good scanner, slow for my needs; but the scans are very good. I've scanned all manner of films as well... negative, slide... Slides don't look as good as the negative scans, but that is prolly because I do not have it pro

OT? Nikon LS 1000 Scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Shel Belinkoff
I've a chance to get a well-maintained Nikon LS 1000 scanner at a reasonable price. I've decided that, for my first scanner, I want something inexpensive while I sort out the whole process of scanning and get a clear idea of what features I want in a new(er) unit. Does anyone have experience wit