Quoting frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Actually, I can't stand Judge Judy, or any of those other TV judges.
Neither can I. The reason I'm aware of their existence is having a certain
relative who persists in watching all of them and telling me about them.
(But if I *had* to watch one,
HAR!!!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
frank theriault wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:07:05 -0500, Doug Franklin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nah, I'm not going along. She's better than most of the real judges,
but she's st
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:07:05 -0500, Doug Franklin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nah, I'm not going along. She's better than most of the real judges,
> but she's still ... uh ... just not my cup of tea.
>
That's okay. I was just pulling your chain.
Actually, I can't stand Judge Judy, or any
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:11:38 -0500, frank theriault wrote:
> PS: I think I'll ask Tom to put that in the FAQ - "don't mock Judge
> Judy". Have we a concensus? (you don't count, Peter, because you did
> the initial mockage)
Nah, I'm not going along. She's better than most of the real judges,
b
Judge Joe Brown is W-A-A-Y cooler, man.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Don't ever, ever, ever mock Judge Judy.
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:53:58 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure you can, Judge Judy in Iran, a head to toe black robed figure eyes
> only visible peering down from the bench
> declaring, "You are guilty of impure thoughts, I sentence you to
> flogging then beheading, just be g
liam Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Keith Whaley"
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the US
only :-(
Hah, hah, hah! I think you're right!
Aren't they a kick?
Jurisprudence in the U.S. of A. Sighhh.
Hey! That's okay...can you imagine i
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Whaley"
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the
US only :-(
Hah, hah, hah! I think you're right!
Aren't they a kick?
Jurisprudence in the U.S. of A. Sighhh.
Hey! That's okay...can you imagine it i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Uhhh, if HE creates an assault, and *I* create the battery, is it a
wash, legally?
I believe that's the sort of question that keeps Judge Judy, Judge Hatchett,
Judge Joe, et al. in business.
ERNR
Hah, hah, hah! I think you're
>
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Situations like this don't get dealt with very well by the people
> concerned.
> Generally, it ends up in a fist fight.
Often some kind of confrontation but I think rarely in physical violence.
> Photographers pull out that old mantra, but the
I'm suing you for that slanderous comment, Billy Bob Robbie.
Thierault! I need a lawyer!
William Robb wrote:
Frivolous litigation is rampant in the world, and I think the USA has to
take credit for starting the trend.
Quoting Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Uhhh, if HE creates an assault, and *I* create the battery, is it a
> wash, legally?
I believe that's the sort of question that keeps Judge Judy, Judge Hatchett,
Judge Joe, et al. in business.
ERNR
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the US only
:-(
>
> > Frivolous litigation is rampant in the world, and
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert"
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the
US only :-(
Ironically the story that I pointed to occurred at a popular Sydney
public
beach where I believe the topless bather was actually breaking the
law to
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the
US only :-(
Hi,
Regarding photography on nude beaches, a person cannot have any
expectation to privacy in public, but this doesn't mean they want
to
(or should ha
ssage - From: "Keith Whaley"
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the US
only :-(
Larry Levy wrote:
William Robb wrote:
If you are walking down the street, and I am
maintaining distance of 6 inches from your nose, I can spend my
entire day screaming obscen
On 18 Nov 2004 at 19:54, Bob W wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Regarding photography on nude beaches, a person cannot have any
> > expectation to privacy in public, but this doesn't mean they want to
> > (or should have to) tolerate images of themselves being taken.
>
> I sort of agree with you. I think it's
Hi,
> Regarding photography on nude beaches, a person cannot have any
> expectation to privacy in public, but this doesn't mean they want to
> (or should have to) tolerate images of themselves being taken.
I sort of agree with you. I think it's rather distasteful to take
photos of people in that
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Keith Whaley"
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the US
only :-(
Larry Levy wrote:
William Robb wrote:
If you are walking down the street, and I am
maintaining distance of 6 inches from your nose, I
> >>Battery vs. battery what's difference just a few amps.
> >Don't blame me, it wasn't my volt.
>
> Additional points to ponder:
> It's not battery unless you're both arrested.
> Because 2 or more cells makes a battery.
> That's the current state of things. As long as you don't resist arrest.
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Whaley"
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the
US only :-(
Larry Levy wrote:
William Robb wrote:
If you are walking down the street, and I am
maintaining distance of 6 inches from your nose, I can spend my
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:51:01 +
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On 18/11/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Battery vs. battery what's difference just a few amps.
>
>Don't blame me, it wasn't my volt.
>
>Cheers,
> Cotty
Additional points to ponder:
It's not batte
I think I'll retreat into meditation, OHMMMm
Cotty wrote:
On 18/11/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Battery vs. battery what's difference just a few amps.
Don't blame me, it wasn't my volt.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Cotty wrote:
On 18/11/04, Steve Jolly, discombobulated, unleashed:
Actually you would be the one committing assault. If I hit you I'd be
committing battery.
That's a very negative attitude, but current.
I kl you!
Be positive!
I believe he's being quite positive, whi
Larry Levy wrote:
William Robb wrote:
If you are walking down the street, and I am
maintaining distance of 6 inches from your nose, I can spend my
entire day screaming obscenities at you, should I so desire.
Doesn't matter a whit whether you feel impinged upon, you're in a
public place, and have
William Robb wrote:
If you are walking down the street, and I am
maintaining distance of 6 inches from your nose, I can spend my
entire day screaming obscenities at you, should I so desire.
Doesn't matter a whit whether you feel impinged upon, you're in a
public place, and have no right to expect
On 18/11/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Battery vs. battery what's difference just a few amps.
Don't blame me, it wasn't my volt.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 18/11/04, Steve Jolly, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>>Actually you would be the one committing assault. If I hit you I'd be
>>>committing battery.
>>
>> That's a very negative attitude, but current.
>
>I kl you!
Be positive!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Battery vs. battery what's difference just a few amps.
Cotty wrote:
On 18/11/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Actually you would be the one committing assault. If I hit you I'd be
committing battery.
That's a very negative attitude, but current.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Cotty wrote:
Actually you would be the one committing assault. If I hit you I'd be
committing battery.
That's a very negative attitude, but current.
I kl you!
S
On 18/11/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Actually you would be the one committing assault. If I hit you I'd be
>committing battery.
That's a very negative attitude, but current.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cott
noia and stupid legislation is reserved for the US
only :-(
or a journalist writing down a description of it in his notebook? Why
are photographers singled out for this sort of treatment?
For the same reason that Pit Bull Terriers are singled out for
extinction.
A number of them have been a
Keith Whaley wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the
US only :-(
How can anyone doing anything in public and on public property be
considered to have any expectation of any kind
Hi,
> From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2004/11/18 Thu AM 03:20:37 GMT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the US only
> :-(
>
> On 17 Nov 2004 at 21:22, Peter J. Alling wrote:
>
>
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Bob W"
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the US
only :-(
or a journalist writing down a description of it in his notebook? Why
are photographers singled out for this sort of treatment?
For the s
What's this? More pictures of Tan? :)
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
Bob Blakely
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:58:04 -0800
>
>You're absolutely right about the litigation crap starting
>in the US,
We call them "trial lawyers". A greedy lot.
And just as bad are the judges who hear the cases.
You'll really, really enjoy this one ...
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04314/4090
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the
US only :-(
or a journalist writing down a description of it in his notebook?
Why
are photographers singled out for this sort of treatment?
For the same reason that Pit Bul
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the US
only :-(
How can anyone doing anything in public and on public property be
considered to have any expectation of any kind of privacy extending
On 17/11/04, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
>That's easy to solve:
>
>http://bugmenot.com/
>
>j
Brilliant site, thanks Juan.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Hi,
Thursday, November 18, 2004, 2:21:52 AM, Bob wrote:
> How can anyone doing anything in public and on public property be considered
> to have any expectation of any kind of privacy extending yards or even feet
> from their person? Would this also extend to an oil artist painting the...
> ah...
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:21:52 -0800, Bob Blakely wrote:
> Doesn't anyone accept responsibility for what they do down there?
No.
> Don't folks understand that to preserve their own liberties, they
> must be tolerant of others liberties lest they be subject to
> restrictions of their own liberty in
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:21:52 -0800, Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can anyone doing anything in public and on public property be considered
> to have any expectation of any kind of privacy extending yards or even feet
> from their person? Would this also extend to an oil artist painti
How can anyone doing anything in public and on public property be considered
to have any expectation of any kind of privacy extending yards or even feet
from their person? Would this also extend to an oil artist painting the...
ah... scene?
Why do people think they can do as they please in publ
m
and jury box is filled with turbulent water and two large shark fins are
shown swimming in this arena.
Regards,
Bob...
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the US
only :-(
How
Ok, I can't get to the site because they want me to register, and I
refuse to. However if you think the US Canada and Australia
are paranoid just look at France.
Rob Studdert wrote:
So now when I shoot at a local public beach I guess have to be very very
careful:
http://www.theage.com.au/artic
On 17 Nov 2004 at 21:22, Peter J. Alling wrote:
> Ok, I can't get to the site because they want me to register, and I
> refuse to. However if you think the US Canada and Australia
> are paranoid just look at France.
Yeah sorry it did it to me too, just go in via google (first URL):
http://www.
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:22:35 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I can't get to the site because they want me to register, and I
> refuse to.
That's easy to solve:
http://bugmenot.com/
j
--
Juan Buhler
http://www.jbuhler.com
blog at http://www.jbuhler.com/blog
So now when I shoot at a local public beach I guess have to be very very
careful:
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/11/10/1100021861161.html?oneclick=true
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/pub
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the
US only :-(
How can anyone doing anything in public and on public property be
considered to have any expectation of any kind of privacy extending
yards or even
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert"
Subject: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the US
only :-(
So now when I shoot at a local public beach I guess have to be very
very
careful:
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/11/10/1100021861161.html?onecl
sday, November 17, 2004 8:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the US only
> :-(
>
>
> So now when I shoot at a local public beach I guess have to be very very
> careful:
>
> http://www.theage.com.au/articles
I just read the article, I guess I prescient.
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 17 Nov 2004 at 21:22, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Ok, I can't get to the site because they want me to register, and I
refuse to. However if you think the US Canada and Australia
are paranoid just look at France.
Yeah sorry it
Okay, that works.
On Nov 17, 2004, at 10:20 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 17 Nov 2004 at 21:22, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Ok, I can't get to the site because they want me to register, and I
refuse to. However if you think the US Canada and Australia
are paranoid just look at France.
Yeah sorry it did it
That doesn't work either.
On Nov 17, 2004, at 9:22 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:22:35 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, I can't get to the site because they want me to register, and I
refuse to.
That's easy to solve:
http://bugmenot.com/
j
--
Juan Buhler
http://
55 matches
Mail list logo
