I wrote: Do Pentax wives play the same games played by Pentax husbands:
having equipment sent to their work address so their spouses won't know?
Mike J replied:
HEY! You're giving away Guild secrets!
The worst offender I knew was a fellow I worked with who collected classic
European optics. He ow
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Päivä: 07. helmikuuta 2003 6:02
Aihe: Re: OT Pentax wife
>At 06:37 PM 06/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>Do Pentax wives play the same games played by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do Pentax wives play the same games played by Pentax husbands: having
> equipment sent to their work address so their spouses won't know?
I don't think it matters. Pentax spouses are smarter than that. Once you start
playing w/ your new toy, the spouse will find out. Wi
At 06:37 PM 06/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Do Pentax wives play the same games played by Pentax husbands: having
equipment sent to their work address so their spouses won't know?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've only done it once. Not because I didn't want my spouse to know, but
because it was coming by
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Paul Franklin Stregevsky wrote:
> Do Pentax wives play the same games played by Pentax husbands: having
> equipment sent to their work address so their spouses won't know?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And hope that your spouse isn't a very skilled with google! The list is
archived y
Do Pentax wives play the same games played by Pentax husbands: having
equipment sent to their work address so their spouses won't know?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 05:50 AM 05/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
This prompts me to ask the other sisters:
How do you carry a Pentax on a non-shooting project basis? Say that you were
carrying one SLR body of your choice plus one lens (be it zoom or prime) and
were just going about your daily business (work, school, shop
> > How do you carry a Pentax on a non-shooting project basis?
I have each camera in a little neoprene sleeve from Zing, and each lens
has its own Zing pouch. That way I can put them in whatever bag I want
and they're protected.
For shooting, I have an ordinary backpack that I stuff all my gear
-
From: "Pat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:42 PM
Subject: Re: Women of the PDML Re: OT Pentax wife
> Kathy L wrote:
>
> > And this sister uses a PZ-1p and all the gear I can carry in my vest
> -Original Message-
> From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > And jeepgirl?
> >
> > Don't you remember? I married her off.
> >
> > tv
>
> oh right! so she stopped do photography with Pentax? what
> did she do,
> marry a N or a C...?
She married an electrician.
Last I
Kathy L wrote:
> And this sister uses a PZ-1p and all the gear I can carry in my vest with
> all the pockets.
> leickly story (kathy)
This prompts me to ask the other sisters:
How do you carry a Pentax on a non-shooting project basis? Say that you were
carrying one SLR body of your choice plus on
That must be me, Kathy Leickly (pronounced "likely"), No one can spell my
name, so don't feel bad.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:22 AM
Subject: Re: Women of the PDML Re: OT Pentax w
> -Original Message-
> From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> What a tantalizing remark THAT is :)
> What happened to Jody? Did she dissappear?
She wandered off shortly after I had almost talked her into buying a
$1500 plane ticket to Charlotte, NC, which is suspiciously close
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Amita wrote, in response to Ann:
> > > Please remember there are a number of women on this list, too.
> >
> > Yeah, there are, what, four of us? We lost that nice lady from New
> > Zealand, right?
> >
>
> You two, Wendy, me ... Doe aka Marnie wandered away recently ...
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 01:30 AM, Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:
At 22:12 3.2.2003 +, you wrote:
OK, so now we're at least seven -- Annsan, Amita, Wendy, me,
Jeepgirl, Pat in
SF and Kathy with the name neither Dan nor I can spell.
Hmm.. Katrin from Germany ?
Antti-Pekka
Wasn't
=== At 2003-02-03, 18:47:00 you wrote: ===
>And the next relevant point to consider is how many of the said women on the
>list are married and therefore, indeed Pentax wives not just Pentax women.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Wonder what the ratio is of Pentax husbands to P
> To get even more firmly on topic, what Pentaxes are the
> sisterhood shooting
> with?
K1000
KM
Optio 230
> -Original Message-
> From: Stan Halpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> And don't forget Daphne - she is still around.
Did we include Deb in Texas?
tv
Cotty posted:
> >I have my own ideas as to which of the gentlemen can tell us,
> >definitively, how
> >many women are here.
>
>
>
>
OK, that's one heard from, but you didn't provide the number. What were we up
to now,
ten?
> At 22:12 3.2.2003 +, you wrote:
> >OK, so now we're at least seven -- Annsan, Amita, Wendy, me, Jeepgirl, Pat
in
> >SF and Kathy with the name neither Dan nor I can spell.
>
> Hmm.. Katrin from Germany ?
>
> Antti-Pekka
.. and of course Adelheid; no idea HOW I managed to forget her. (I'v
gt;
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: Women of the PDML Re: OT Pentax wife
> Actually, Fairy-Girl hung around (actively) for about 9 months until her
> husband lost his job and they had to move to another part of Australia.
> Breaking her first camera was fairly earl
>I have my own ideas as to which of the gentlemen can tell us,
>definitively, how
>many women are here.
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.
Dear Adelheid!
Cotty
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/
Ka and Kaf?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Treena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: OT Pentax wife
> I'm a Pentax wife, and I've got a Pentax husband - we have no
compatibility
>
> OK, so now we're at least seven -- Annsan, Amita, Wendy, me, Jeepgirl, Pat
> in
> SF and Kathy with the name neither Dan nor I can spell.
eight ^_^
>
> To get even more firmly on topic, what Pentaxes are the sisterhood
> shooting
> with?
MX and ME
bye Katrin
At 22:12 3.2.2003 +, you wrote:
>OK, so now we're at least seven -- Annsan, Amita, Wendy, me, Jeepgirl, Pat in
>SF and Kathy with the name neither Dan nor I can spell.
Hmm.. Katrin from Germany ?
Antti-Pekka
---
* Antti-Pekka Virjonen * Fiskarsinkatu 7 D * GSM: +358 500 789 753 *
* C
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 10:36 PM, tom wrote:
Actually, the girl in NZ wasn't Jeepgirl it was...dang...what the hell
was her name? I tried to talk her into coming to GFM. Was it Jody? Her
email was petitmiam or something?
Petitmiam I think that was it. Didn't she get really irked at
I'm a Pentax wife, and I've got a Pentax husband - we have no compatibility
issues. :)
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 12:47 PM
Subject: RE: OT Pentax wife
> Amita wrote, in response to A
Actually, Fairy-Girl hung around (actively) for about 9 months until her
husband lost his job and they had to move to another part of Australia.
Breaking her first camera was fairly early in her stay on PDML - several of
us facilitated replacements and she kept on. She had a thriving kids'
photogra
> Actually, the girl in NZ wasn't Jeepgirl it was...dang...what the hell
> was her name? I tried to talk her into coming to GFM. Was it Jody?
Yeah it was jody.
> And then there was Fairy-girl.
I dont think she hung around all that long, after she broke or Z1 or what
ever.
Yep the males sure ou
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> What about Pat in SF?
Thanks, Bruce . I was trying to avoid this thread altogether, but as you
were naming names... I admit to being a Pentax woman, but not a Pentax wife.
The other half shoots N.
I tend to agree w/ what Amita said, "But truth be told, the term "Pentax
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> OK, so now we're at least seven -- Annsan, Amita, Wendy,
> me, Jeepgirl, Pat in
> SF and Kathy with the name neither Dan nor I can spell.
Actually, the girl in NZ wasn't Jeepgirl it was...dang...what the hell
w
OK, so now we're at least seven -- Annsan, Amita, Wendy, me, Jeepgirl, Pat in
SF and Kathy with the name neither Dan nor I can spell.
And we have not yet heard from either of the two gentlemen I expected to know
fer sure.
To get even more firmly on topic, what Pentaxes are the sisterhood shooti
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 07:18 PM, tom wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Amita wrote, in response to Ann:
Please remember there are a number of women on this list, too.
Yeah, there are, what, four of us? We lost that nice
lady fro
What about Pat in SF?
Bruce
Monday, February 3, 2003, 5:18:38 PM, you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>>
>> Amita wrote, in response to Ann:
>> > > Please remember there are a number of women on this list, too.
>> >
>> > Yeah, t
> Jeepgirl.
Thanks, Tom, that's who I was thinking of.
> And the next relevant point to consider is how many of the said women
on the
> list are married and therefore, indeed Pentax wives not just Pentax
women.
Well, I'm married. But truth be told, the term "Pentax wife" sounds to
me like it's
More enjoyable than my wife, and less obnoxious than 98% of the posts
here lately.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's all right Lasse, I thought it was pretty funny
Cheers
Shaun
Lasse,
This is why I use my Nikon stuff for anything important. You are welcome to try out what ever you would like with my Pentax stuff.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John M. wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussi
> Please remember there are a number of women on this list, too.
Yeah, there are, what, four of us? We lost that nice lady from New
Zealand, right?
I could probably say a few choice words about Pentax husbands, as well,
but I'll save that for another day.
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
> John M. wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> > >If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would
> go
> > >talk to my wife.
> > >
> > >BR
I refrained from replying to Bruce to ask him if I could supply the name
of a good divorc
gt; Sent: February 2, 2003 3:06 PM
> Subject: Re: OT Pentax wife (Was: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car
> shit,not politics, not Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that
> isallowed without rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
>
> >
> >
> > John Poir
From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: February 2, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: OT Pentax wife (Was: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car
shit,not politics, not Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that
isallowed without rancor. WAS
HI, Lasse.
Thanks for the explanation. Cheerfully accepted.
John Poirier
- Original Message -
From: "Lasse Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: February 2, 2003 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: OT Pentax wife
> Regarding my "joke" o
ad these list messages? Are you?
keith whaley
> - Original Message -
> From: "Lasse Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: February 2, 2003 2:39 PM
> Subject: OT Pentax wife (Was: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car sh
My previous reply appears completely blank in my reader. Just in case
and to make sure I resend it (shortening the subject line, if that had
anything to do with it):
John P. wrote
"This "joke" is not at all funny. It is quite simply disgusting. We
should
all have nothing but contempt for a menta
ore "jokes" along the same
lines inn the future.
Lasse
- Original Message -
From: "John Poirier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: OT Pentax wife (Was: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs:
car shit
PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: February 2, 2003 2:39 PM
Subject: OT Pentax wife (Was: Shit, Crap & Politics, Was:Re: Vs: car shit,
not politics, not Pentax, but about as valid as any of the crap that is
allowed without rancor. WAS: bRe: PMA and Pentax DSLR
>
> Yeah,
John M. wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would
go
> >talk to my wife.
> >
> >BR
> >
> Geez, BR, you need to get a Pentax wife. Sweet, amenable, easy to
get
> along with - and not too expensive. Not as fast as o
48 matches
Mail list logo