I own the A 35/2.8, which is supposed to be the same optic. As others have pointed
out, it is not a stellar lens but perfectly OK. About par with a decent zoom,
something that probably explains the popularity of zoom lenses.
Pål
Hi!
MI> i used to have one (from ebay), until its diafragm stuck. then i
MI> sold it on ebay for what i paid originally (although i did warn
MI> the buyer).
MI> the lens is fine. i have 35/2 now, and except the weight and the
MI> price, i'm not sure there's a lot of difference.
MI> i have just l
I would like to point out that this A was better built than the M which
might have aging spring. I stripped down both before. This A has metal
aperture ring, not plastic.
regards,
Alan Chan
I am about to buy the above lens in Excellent condition from KEH.
Well, as a matter of fact a friend of mi
I had the A35/2.8 which was said to be identical to the M. I did some
landscape shots with it and thought it wasn't particular sharp as a prime
lens.
regards,
Alan Chan
I am about to buy the above lens in Excellent condition from KEH.
Well, as a matter of fact a friend of mine is about to buy th
Peter Spiro wrote:
35mm is my favorite focal length, and at one time or another I have
tried almost all of them, and I have posted some comparisons at
http://ca.geocities.com/spirope/infinitytest.htm
I found something intriguing there. You were using this method:
"The film photos were printed on
: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:05 PM
Subject: Opinions needed about SMC M 35/2.8
> Hi!
>
> I am about to buy the above lens in Excellent condition from KEH.
> Well, as a matter of fact a frie
Hi!
I am about to buy the above lens in Excellent condition from KEH.
Well, as a matter of fact a friend of mine is about to buy this lens
which then be brought over to Israel.
Anyway, is there anyone on the list who actually has/had this lens and
used it? If so, I would very much like to hear yo
7 matches
Mail list logo
