I have this lens, and I love it. Since I have my 24-90mm Pentax, I seem to be
using it more for Macro only, and less for general stuff. I can recommend it.
For portraiture, it could be too sharp according to a lot of peoples
opinions. I did notice one thing that is a bit less: flare. It is
I presume you're talking about the 90/2.8 1:1 AF Macro?
I've currently got the AF version, and I had the MF version prior to that.
Its a superb all round lens, sharp as a tack, and with excellent Bokeh (to
my poorly trained eye!). Also, the 1:1 without the use of tubes is quite handy!
It
I was wondering if anyone could provide an opinion on this Tamron
lens being used as a portrait lens? I'm thinking of taking the
plunge on a serious portrait lens (AF) for about $400.
I presume you're talking about the 90/2.8 1:1 AF Macro? [snip] Its
a superb all round lens, sharp as a tack,
3 matches
Mail list logo
