Thanks Frank. Gotta get away from this winter weather. My photography
is going to the dogs.
Paul
On Feb 28, 2005, at 10:05 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:19:58 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy for quite some
Time to pull out that ol' Bow-Wow Takumar LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Frank. Gotta get away from this winter weather. My photography
is going to the dogs.
Paul
HAR!
On Mar 1, 2005, at 7:04 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Time to pull out that ol' Bow-Wow Takumar LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Frank. Gotta get away from this winter weather. My photography
is going to the dogs.
Paul
Very nice shot Paul.
Exposure looks bang on.
Cute guy.
S...I see you like the Sigma flash.:-)
Dave
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy
for
quite some time. Yesterday I got him to sit still
on
Thanks Dave. Yes, I do like the Sigma flash. It fully supports all the *istD
flash capabilities and seems to do so with great accuracy.
Paul
Very nice shot Paul.
Exposure looks bang on.
Cute guy.
S...I see you like the Sigma flash.:-)
Dave
In a message dated 2/27/2005 11:53:08 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, Paul, since the lighting was primarily flash, what specifically caused
this look and how can it be avoided. Please remember, you're talking to a
guy who's never used a flash ;-))
Shel
===
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard
Subject: Re: PAW: Willy the Springer Spaniel
You think getting one to sit still is difficult? Try
it with three of 'em!
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/36642090
I see you didn't manage it..
Nice lookin fellas.
It turns out we have
tyr again...
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy
for
quite some time. Yesterday I got him to sit still
on
the stairs for a few moments. He's getting on in
years now, but he's still quite handsome. Shot him
with the FA 50/1.4 at f8 and a
Nice shot, Wendy. It almost looks like a painting. Beautiful.
Paul
tyr again...
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy
for
quite some time. Yesterday I got him to sit still
on
the stairs for a few moments. He's getting on in
years
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy for
quite some time. Yesterday I got him to sit still on
the stairs for a few moments. He's getting on in
years now, but he's still quite handsome. Shot him
with the FA 50/1.4 at f8 and a single flash bounced
off
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:19:58 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy for quite some time.
Yesterday I got him to sit still on the stairs for a few moments. He's
getting on in years now, but he's still quite handsome. Shot him with the
Beautiful shot of a dignified spaniel.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy for quite some time. Yesterday
I got him to sit still on the stairs for a few moments. He's getting on in
years now, but he's still quite handsome. Shot him with the FA 50/1.4 at f8
On 27/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy for quite some time.
Yesterday I got him to sit still on the stairs for a few moments. He's
getting on in years now, but he's still quite handsome. Shot him with the
FA 50/1.4 at f8 and a
Thanks John. That describes some of us here as well, doesn't it? vbg
On Feb 27, 2005, at 12:09 AM, John Francis wrote:
PAW, indeed! I like it.
A portly, aged, gentleman, but still one with some dignity.
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 2005, at 12:09 AM, John Francis wrote:
PAW, indeed! I like it.
A portly, aged, gentleman, but still one with some dignity.
Thanks John. That describes some of us here as well, doesn't it? vbg
I dunno... that bit about dignity might be
On Feb 27, 2005, at 1:20 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Thanks Shel,
What you're seeing may be related to using a flash, in that the
lighting is more even than if it was window light or even studio light.
The flash is bounced off the ceiling, so it's somewhat akin to open
sky light. Of course
Thanks Peter.
On Feb 27, 2005, at 3:16 AM, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Beautiful shot of a dignified spaniel.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy for quite some time.
Yesterday I got him to sit still on the stairs for a few moments.
He's getting on in years now,
Forget it Cotty. It's obvious that the PDML is going to the dogs :-).
On Feb 27, 2005, at 3:57 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 27/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy for quite some time.
Yesterday I got him to sit still on the stairs for a few
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3152929
Lovely shot Paul - just 2 small problems with it.
1. There's a dog in the frame.
2. There's no cat in the frame.
Forget it Cotty. It's obvious that the PDML is going to the
dogs :-).
Thanks Godfrey. Yes, you're right, the lighting gives it an unusual look, and I
think the color combinations emphasize that.
Paul
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3152929
Lovely shot Paul - just 2 small problems with it.
1.
So, Paul, since the lighting was primarily flash, what specifically caused
this look and how can it be avoided. Please remember, you're talking to a
guy who's never used a flash ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... the lighting gives it an unusual look, and I
It's what happens when you're shooting with a nicely broad flash
beam from a bit of a distance (as in with a modest portrait or
tele lens): ... Even but very flat lighting, not much modeling
from shadows. The crisp, high definition edges and lack of
shadow modeling are what give it the surreal
The lighting was virtually all flash. The ambient light was negligible. In this
case I didn't want to avoid this look, because it seemed to suit the subject.
With his black fur, Willy gets lost in the shadows with more conventional
lighting. However, if I wanted to achieve a very nice high key
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy for quite some time. Yesterday
I got him to sit still on the stairs for a few moments. He's getting on in
years now, but he's still quite handsome. Shot him with the FA 50/1.4 at f8 and
a single flash bounced off the ceiling. (This is one of the
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 02:19:58AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy for quite some time.
Yesterday I got him to sit still on the stairs for a few moments. He's
getting on in years now, but he's still quite handsome. Shot him with the FA
50/1.4
Hi Paul ...
Were it not for john's post containing the URL, I'd have never seen this
snap. It is clear that you have a close bond with the ol' guy. Good
capture.
There is something about the pic that bothers me. The distinction between
the black fur of Willy and the red background seems - for
26 matches
Mail list logo
