The real question is If they had been *prevented*
from taking pictures, how would that have helped us or hindered them?
Whenever I hear of photographers being hassled because they might
terrorists I think, OK, suppose I *am* a terrorist. Now I have a
picture of the Brooklyn Bridge! (for
Both are great shots Mark.
I like the gentle curve of the rail line, leading to the bridge.Fall colours
are nice to.
The PPG buikding is great. The reflections are crisp and the lines work well
together.
Dave B
I've been so busy with work for school
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese
Subject: Re: PESO(s): Two fall shots from Pittsburgh
I think it also has a lot to do with the government creating the
perception that they're being pro-active in fighting terrorism and trying
to make people feel safer.
Bingo.
Sadly
which relies on people being ignorant enough that this actually works.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 8:15 AM
Subject: Re: PESO(s): Two fall shots from Pittsburgh
I think it also has a lot
Hi!
Railroads are surprisingly easy to sabotage.
I'm sure that capturing reflected photons is gonna knock a whole bunch
of trains off the track.
Bill, it sure has to do with security, bit the real reason is unknown to me.
Boris
On 11/18/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill, it sure has to do with security, bit the real reason is unknown to me.
I've got a pretty good idea what the reason may be, but that would be
getting into a political discussion, which I really don't want to do
right now.
-frank
--
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Railroads are surprisingly easy to sabotage.
Well then they should make it illegal to put bombs near railroad
tracks. I can't believe that photographing them has ever lead to
bombing them.
I wonder if
First let me say I am against the idea of passing laws against maybes.
Having said that, it does not take much imagination to see the glorious
leader pointing out to his paradise bound disciples, You want to place
your explosives here, and here, and here, pointing to the places on the
graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First let me say I am against the idea of passing laws against maybes.
Having said that, it does not take much imagination to see the glorious
leader pointing out to his paradise bound disciples, You want to place
your explosives here, and here, and here,
On 11/18/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry but I don't buy it.
Photographs of the WTC were of no help in this manner!
For suicide belt bombers, a hand-drawn sketch on the back of a napkin
is more than sufficient.
For attacks between these two extremes, published photos in
What the authorities are worried about are details that aren't
published. Recent changes, new security measures, photo reconnaissance
is very good at that. The fact that most photographs are useless in
that regard just means that they guard against everything. It's CYA in
many cases, after
Mark Roberts wrote:
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been so busy with work for school projects that I've barely had any
time to shoot photos for myself lately. I managed to get a couple in
today. Two contrasting impressions of a fall day in the 'Burgh.
Hi!
Supposedly they did. The real question is If they had been *prevented*
from taking pictures, how would that have helped us or hindered them?
Whenever I hear of photographers being hassled because they might
terrorists I think, OK, suppose I *am* a terrorist. Now I have a
picture of the
I've been there Boris (three times) and
I have very mixed feelings about the
whole situation. But this is not the
place to discuss them.
Don
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Supposedly they did. The real question is If they had been *prevented*
from taking pictures, how would that have helped us
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: PESO(s): Two fall shots from Pittsburgh
Sorry but I don't buy it.
Photographs of the WTC were of no help in this manner!
For suicide belt bombers, a hand-drawn sketch on the back of a napkin
is more than sufficient.
For attacks
Hi!
I've been there Boris (three times) and I have very mixed feelings about
the whole situation. But this is not the place to discuss them.
Do alert me when you are going to be coming next time...
Boris
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Supposedly they did. The real question is If they had been *prevented*
from taking pictures, how would that have helped us or hindered them?
Whenever I hear of photographers being hassled because they might
terrorists I think, OK, suppose I *am* a
I like the pics alot Mark. I wish they were bigger. Brings back alot
of memories, esp the tracks alongside the Monongahela.
rg
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've been so busy with work for school projects that I've barely had any
time to shoot photos for myself lately. I managed to get a couple in
Hi!
I've been so busy with work for school projects that I've barely had any
time to shoot photos for myself lately. I managed to get a couple in
today. Two contrasting impressions of a fall day in the 'Burgh.
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
In Israel it is forbidden to photograph
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: PESO(s): Two fall shots from Pittsburgh
In Israel it is forbidden to photograph railroads unless one has a
special permit to do so.
Why?
William Robb
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been so busy with work for school projects that I've barely had any
time to shoot photos for myself lately. I managed to get a couple in
today. Two contrasting impressions of a fall day in the 'Burgh.
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
In Israel
): Two fall shots from Pittsburgh
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: PESO(s): Two fall shots from Pittsburgh
In Israel it is forbidden to photograph railroads unless one has a
special permit to do so.
Why?
William Robb
Railroads are surprisingly easy to sabotage.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Boris Liberman Subject: Re:
PESO(s): Two fall shots from Pittsburgh
In Israel it is forbidden to photograph railroads unless one has a
special permit to do so.
Why?
William Robb
On 11/17/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Railroads are surprisingly easy to sabotage.
Well then they should make it illegal to put bombs near railroad
tracks. I can't believe that photographing them has ever lead to
bombing them.
I wonder if Osama's boys took piccies of the WTC
The Israelis are rightly paranoid...
(Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you).
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/17/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Railroads are surprisingly easy to sabotage.
Well then they should make it illegal to put bombs
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: PESO(s): Two fall shots from Pittsburgh
Railroads are surprisingly easy to sabotage.
I'm sure that capturing reflected photons is gonna knock a whole bunch of
trains off the track.
William Robb
Yes, the bridge is level. But the photo appears to lean a little to
the left.
What can I say?
Godfrey
On Nov 17, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Note to Godfrey: I checked that photo using the bridge in the
background
as a reference and I think it's about as level as it's humanly
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 17, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Note to Godfrey: I checked that photo using the bridge in the
background as a reference and I think it's about as level as it's
humanly possible to be.
Yes, the bridge is level. But the photo appears
On 11/12/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been so busy with work for school projects that I've barely
had any
time to shoot photos for myself lately. I managed to get a couple in
today. Two contrasting impressions of a fall day in the 'Burgh.
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
On 12/11/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've been so busy with work for school projects that I've barely had any
time to shoot photos for myself lately. I managed to get a couple in
today. Two contrasting impressions of a fall day in the 'Burgh.
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
In a message dated 11/12/2005 2:06:25 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been so busy with work for school projects that I've barely had
any
time to shoot photos for myself lately. I managed to get a couple in
today. Two
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been so busy with work for school projects that I've barely had
any
time to shoot photos for myself lately. I managed to get a couple in
today. Two contrasting impressions of a fall day in the
On 11/12/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been so busy with work for school projects that I've barely had any
time to shoot photos for myself lately. I managed to get a couple in
today. Two contrasting impressions of a fall day in the 'Burgh.
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
I've been so busy with work for school projects that I've barely had any
time to shoot photos for myself lately. I managed to get a couple in
today. Two contrasting impressions of a fall day in the 'Burgh.
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
Mark,
Classic S curve in railroad track shot, very nice! Later fall color
could only improve.
Building reflections scene is a well composed mix of architectural
styles.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been so busy with work for school projects that I've barely had
any
Very nice. I sent the url to my daughter who lived in Pittsburgh for
five years.
Paul
On Nov 12, 2005, at 3:03 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've been so busy with work for school projects that I've barely had
any
time to shoot photos for myself lately. I managed to get a couple in
today. Two
Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
Classic S curve in railroad track shot, very nice!
Thanks! It really needs a train, though, doesn't it? Preferably a steam
locomotive!
Later fall color could only improve.
Sadly, we're about at the end of fall color here. I missed some
spectacular
Could it have been the duct taped lumps under their flowing garments
that made the dweeb suspicious..?
Yes, steam trains improve all images where tracks exist.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
Classic S curve in railroad track shot,
Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it have been the duct taped lumps under their flowing garments
that made the dweeb suspicious..?
Actually, it was the tripod, but that worked to my advantage in the end.
I was out shooting video for the project I'm doing for my digital video
class. I had
Very nice, Mark. It's good to see some new stuff!
Interesting how similar the scenery in the first pic
is to the east bank of the Hudson River about 20 mi
north of New York.
Work has also had me at a near-standstill
photographically for the last few weeks. Just
uploaded an old shot for the
40 matches
Mail list logo
