Actually, a black cloth would be better for macros.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Igor Roshchin"
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - water droplet in abstract flower - What works?
Bob,
Sorry, but I
Igor,
Yes, I mean a simple dropcloth. Mine is green with some red and blue
highlights.
I saw Charles Brazwell use one with some small print pattern on it,
just out of focus.
Regards, Bob S.,
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
> Bob,
>
> Sorry, but I was not at GFM.
> Do you
Bob,
Sorry, but I was not at GFM.
Do you mean the technique that is frequently used by TV/movie
and funny-photo outlets people when they remove the green background,
replacing it with some other background?
In any case, - I am afraid that in this situation it would be hard
to make it working:
t
Igor,
I have a green cloth in my camera bag, just to simplify backgrounds.
(GFM presenter's suggestion)
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
> Jostein, Boris, Bob, Joseph, Ken and Larry,
> - thank you all for your comments.
>
> Don't worry - I don't mind the bru
Jostein, Boris, Bob, Joseph, Ken and Larry,
- thank you all for your comments.
Don't worry - I don't mind the brutal constructive ones.
Boris wrote:
> The
> way you chose to frame the droplets is so that there is no sense of
> dropping down. So all of them are more like statement of the fact
>
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2009/IMGP7077-2.jpg
Is my favorite.
One of my current kicks is to get the object of interest out of the
center of the photo. This one has the droplet in the lower right
third, and the petals, stems and leaves form a frame that keeps
drawing my eye around to
None of the two batches work for me ;+{
You've included too much distracting background, although the second batch
is somewhat better in this regard.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Igor Roshchin"
Subject: PESO - water drop
Either of these two appeal to me more than the rest, because the water
droplet is the center of attention, and has a better image contained
therein.
On Jun 2, 2009, at 23:22 , Igor Roshchin wrote:
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2009/IMGP7084.jpg
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS
Igor,
I like the 5th shotof the 1st batch the best.
There seems to be a bit of extra sharpness to the flower.
Having the drop in sharp focus is great, but I need more of the flower
itself in sharp focus.
Also, the white highlights are a bit distracting.
Can you simplify the background?
Regards, Bob
Igor, among the first pack none works for me. I'll explain why. The
way you chose to frame the droplets is so that there is no sense of
dropping down. So all of them are more like statement of the fact
without much additional merit.
>From the second pack the last one is most interesting. Mainly du
2009/6/3 Igor Roshchin :
In all your shots, I'm a bit bothered about the specular highlights. Flash?
> http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2009/IMGP7077.jpg
I think this one conveys the droplet pretty well. The arched highlight
at the top defines the droplet very nicely, and the lensing eff
Hi All,
Your opinion is needed: which of these shots work for you,
and which don't, and (if possible) - why.
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2009/IMGP7077.jpg
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2009/IMGP7077-2.jpg
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2009/IMGP7077-3.jpg
http:
12 matches
Mail list logo
