All nice work, Toine! My choice, if I may, is #1. The composition elevates it
to another level.
Jack
--- On Mon, 6/21/10, Toine wrote:
> From: Toine
> Subject: PESO warning flowers (orchids)!
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Monday, June 21, 2010, 7:27 A
Ok thanks. Maybe I have more for you:
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/142-orchids2
Toine
On 21 June 2010 20:31, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> Sorry - I think 1 is way better straight on closeups of blossoms with
> shar foreground fading to out of focus edges is something
> one s
Sorry - I think 1 is way betterstraight on closeups of blossoms
with shar foreground fading to out of focus edges is something
one sees an awful lot of ... the 1st one has much more going on ,
beautifully balanced, etc...
anway - its just IMHO :_)
ann
Toine wrote:
That's interesting
Toine,
2/4 is interesting, but not quite a stunner.
I like the composition with the blur in the background, but
the main flowers need more 'punch' to contrast the softness.
I'm not sure how you can get that from the subject you picked.
I too favor 1/4 as the best of the lot. Beautiful photo!
Regar
That's interesting... With the first one you point at 1/4? I was
hoping you would choose nr 2/4 :)
Toine
On 21 June 2010 16:47, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> This one is especially nice stunning , in fact ...
>
> http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/141-orchids
>
> The others are mu
This one is especially nice stunning , in fact ...
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/141-orchids
The others are much less interseting, I think and frankly having them in
the group kinda diminishes the strength of the
first one...
If I were viewing only the first one I'd
A few orchids from yesterday's photowalk:
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/141-orchids
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions
7 matches
Mail list logo
