;>> Dan
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>>> Magnificent shot. Was possibly held for further review which could very
>>>> well be a compliment to the image. Unfortunately they don't provide a
>>>> grade.
rtunately they don't provide a grade.
>>>
>>> Jack
>>>
>>> --- On Mon, 8/31/09, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Daniel J. Matyola
>>>> Subject: Re: PPG quota
>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
unately they don't provide a grade.
>>
>> Jack
>>
>> --- On Mon, 8/31/09, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>>
>>> From: Daniel J. Matyola
>>> Subject: Re: PPG quota
>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>>> Date: Monday,
ibly held for further review which could very well
> be a compliment to the image. Unfortunately they don't provide a grade.
>
> Jack
>
> --- On Mon, 8/31/09, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
>> From: Daniel J. Matyola
>> Subject: Re: PPG quota
>> To: "Pentax
Nice shot. Better than the majority of landscapes in the gallery.
I think when a pic sits that long it means it passed peer review but
was rejected by the gallery gods.
Paul
On Aug 31, 2009, at 9:39 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I had another of those frustrating experiences with the PPG.
Alm
Magnificent shot. Was possibly held for further review which could very well be
a compliment to the image. Unfortunately they don't provide a grade.
Jack
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> From: Daniel J. Matyola
> Subject: Re: PPG quota
> To: "Pentax-Discuss
I had another of those frustrating experiences with the PPG.
Almost a month ago, I submitted several old scanned images, including this one:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9522634
All the others were rejected. in about 2 weeks. I submitted several
more, and they were rejected, but this
>
> Jostein
>
> 2009/8/31 Jack Davis :
>> What I was clumsily trying to say, the TOTAL time needed from clicking on
>> PPG to the opening of a selected artist's image is 'prox 4 - 6 secs.
>>
>> Jack
>>
>> --- On Mon, 8/31/09, Bob Sulliv
ng of a selected artist's image is 'prox 4 - 6 secs.
>
> Jack
>
> --- On Mon, 8/31/09, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>
>> From: Bob Sullivan
>> Subject: Re: PPG quota
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 9:54 AM
What I was clumsily trying to say, the TOTAL time needed from clicking on PPG
to the opening of a selected artist's image is 'prox 4 - 6 secs.
Jack
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> From: Bob Sullivan
> Subject: Re: PPG quota
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List&
from me
>>> > except providing the link.
>>> >
>>> > Jostein
>>> >
>>> > 2009/8/30 Rick Womer :
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> I filled in the data form for a PPG account
>>> shortly after it ope
4-6 secs.
> Comcast cable connection.
>
> Jack
>
> --- On Mon, 8/31/09, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>
>> From: Bob Sullivan
>> Subject: Re: PPG quota
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 6:37 AM
>> Jostein,
>> On
n.
Jack
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> From: Bob Sullivan
> Subject: Re: PPG quota
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 6:37 AM
> Jostein,
> On occasion, somebody here will link to the gallery for a
> photo.
> I
er uploaded anything. When the very few
>> PDMLers who post things to the PPG post PESOs there, I usually run out of
>> patience wth the incredibly slow interface long before I've seen the photos.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> http://photo.net/phot
On 31/08/2009, AlunFoto wrote:
> Rick,
>
> You're not connecting via dialup or mobile 3G by any chance? I really
> don't recognise your description...
I have been running ADSL 1.5Mb and it was clumsy and slow as a wet
week to load, I do not allow any of my Browsers (IE, FF, Chrome and
Safari).
-
e wth the incredibly slow interface long before I've seen the photos.
>
>
>
> Rick
>
> http://photo.net/photos/RickW
>
>
> --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Bong Manayon wrote:
>
>> From: Bong Manayon
>> Subject: PPG quota
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
On Aug 29, 2009, at 19:41 , Rick Womer wrote:
I tried to look at people's photos, and found the interface to be
slower than an Apple II in Job's garage.
Did anyone see the program "How It's Made?" that I saw last night
(made in 2008) where they showed how player piano rolls were
manufact
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
> On 30/08/2009, David J Brooks wrote:
>> Me four.
>
> Me also, signed up during Beta phase but was disgusted by the
> interface and a few other issues so elected not to contribute.
I contributed during the beta stage, and had 4 of my 5 entries
On 30/08/2009, David J Brooks wrote:
> Me four.
Me also, signed up during Beta phase but was disgusted by the
interface and a few other issues so elected not to contribute.
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa:
I agree, Dan. It has, doubtless, been a photo stimulus to many.
Jack
--- On Sat, 8/29/09, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> From: Daniel J. Matyola
> Subject: Re: PPG quota
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009, 8:17 PM
> Nothing is perfect,
Me four.
Dave
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Me three! And I signed up before the gallery opened too!
> Nice images, but a pain in the butt to view or join.
> Regards, Bob S.
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:18 PM, John Francis wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:41:18PM
On 29/8/09, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>I tried to look at people's photos, and found the interface to be slower
>than an Apple II in Job's garage.
Rick, I have totally underestimated you! What was a it **really** like
in there?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | Peopl
Me three! And I signed up before the gallery opened too!
Nice images, but a pain in the butt to view or join.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:18 PM, John Francis wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:41:18PM -0700, Rick Womer wrote:
>>
>>
>> I filled in the data form for a PPG account
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:41:18PM -0700, Rick Womer wrote:
>
>
> I filled in the data form for a PPG account shortly after it opened a few
> years ago.
>
> Then, I read here and elsewhere about the ridiculous review system, which has
> only gotten more ridiculous.
>
> I tried to look at peop
>
> Rick
>
> http://photo.net/photos/RickW
>
>
> --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Bong Manayon wrote:
>
>> From: Bong Manayon
>> Subject: PPG quota
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 7:44 PM
>&
ckW
--- On Wed, 8/26/09, Bong Manayon wrote:
> From: Bong Manayon
> Subject: PPG quota
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 7:44 PM
> After a long spell, I uploaded
> something in PPG and discovered that we
> now have
Okay, I get it now ... we have a quota of 10 per week. I was not
paying attention when I uploaded something like 9 photos and came back
a day later to find there was only 1 box available. Still tames the
beast :-)
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Bong Manayon wrote:
> After a long spell, I uploa
gt; From: Daniel J. Matyola
> Subject: Re: PPG quota
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 12:08 PM
> It seems that PPG is now limiting
> each submitter to 10 images "UnderReview."
>
> Previously, there were ten input boxes when y
Daniel, Thanks!
I think it was few weeks ago when I e-mailed them.
Seems pretty slow.
--Sasha
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Sasha:
>
> I sent in your name and email address to PPG in accordance with their
> instructions. They should send you a photographer ID that w
Sasha:
I sent in your name and email address to PPG in accordance with their
instructions. They should send you a photographer ID that will allow
you to register.
They don't seem to be responding as quickly as they once did.
Dan
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
> Btw, how do
Btw, how do you get into ppg?
I I wrote them via "contact us" at ppg site quite some time ago but
never got anything from them.
--Sasha
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> It seems that PPG is now limiting each submitter to 10 images "UnderReview."
>
> Previously, there w
It seems that PPG is now limiting each submitter to 10 images "UnderReview."
Previously, there were ten input boxes when you went to the "unload"
page, and you could submit more than one page (10 photos) at a time.
Now, you are limited to one page. When I went to upload today, there
were nine inp
In a message dated 8/26/2009 4:44:51 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
bongmana...@gmail.com writes:
After a long spell, I uploaded something in PPG and discovered that we
now have a quota of 1 upload a week. Should make voting easier...
--
Bong Manayon
==
I guess that means that tra
After a long spell, I uploaded something in PPG and discovered that we
now have a quota of 1 upload a week. Should make voting easier...
--
Bong Manayon
http://www.bong.uni.cc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the P
34 matches
Mail list logo
