ROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: PROS-was:ABORTION-was: Way OT: GUNS, GUNS, AND MORE GUNS.
> Let's see,
>
> Bob is "Piss Face". I'm "Dip Shit". I don't blame you for being
> jealous, Tom.
>
> I'm sure som
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 01:37 PM, tom wrote:
Can I have a cool name too?
tv
Nope. If you want a cool name, you'll have to earn it. :-)
Dan Scott
om: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: PROS [WAS:ABORTION-was: Way OT: GUNS, GUNS, AND MORE GUNS.]
>
>
> Dr E D F Williams wrote:
> >
> > It would appear that although the title of t
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Blakely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> MORE GUNS.
>
>
> Dr E D F Williams,
>
> Having been certified by Mr. Bruce Rubenstein as "Piss Face", May I
> recommend, should I not already be there, that you put me
> in one of your
> filters. Yup, I volunteer.
C
Dr E D F Williams,
Having been certified by Mr. Bruce Rubenstein as "Piss Face", May I
recommend, should I not already be there, that you put me in one of your
filters. Yup, I volunteer.
All of the photos & negatives that I produce as part of my job belong to my
clients, therefore all is handed
Dr E D F Williams wrote:
>
> It would appear that although the title of the thread is still strange the
> subject matter has changed. I'm back and ready to make a whole load of
> filters should it happen again.
Oh, we know that you will! Why don't you just drop it Doctor.
Everybody else has.
A
iams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002
- Original Message -
From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: PROS-was:AB
Well, Bruce, I didn't ask why. Everyone knows it's about attempting to
control others through inflicting pain. This is what I don't understand.
Don't you know that control is an illusion? - but thanks for your
sententious description of me.
Regards from,
Piss Face
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 7:01 AM
Subject: Re: PROS-was:ABORTION-was: Way OT: GUNS, GUNS, AND MORE GUNS.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Feroze Kistan
> Subject: Re: PROS-was:ABORTION-wa
t: Friday, December 13, 2002 6:29 AM
Subject: Re: PROS-was:ABORTION-was: Way OT: GUNS, GUNS, AND MORE GUNS.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Dan Scott
> Subject: Re: PROS-was:ABORTION-was: Way OT: GUNS, GUNS, AND MORE
> GUNS.
>
>
> >
> > What if someone
I think you've just described an art director.
At 10:03 PM 12/12/2002 -0600, you wrote:
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 09:23 PM, William Robb wrote:
No, you could borrow, rent or steal it.
I think you do have to have a camera to be a photographer
though.
What if someone else fires the s
Based on some of the horror stories about un-licensed cosmetic surgeons
in the State of New York recently I guess the answer to your question
is maybe.
At 09:23 PM 12/12/2002 -0600, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dan
Subject: Re: PROS-was:ABORTION-was: Way OT: GUNS, GUNS, AND
Hell I didn't know you had to buy a license, then again I'm in the US.
At 08:55 PM 12/12/2002 -0600, you wrote:
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 05:56 PM, William Robb wrote:
To be a professional photographer, you need to buy a camera and
a business licence.
William Robb
Do you actually
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 21:23:20 -0600, William Robb wrote:
> Of course, by the same theory, if you have a scalpel, are you
> automatically a surgeon?
_I_ _am_. I don't know about _you_. :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott
Subject: Re: PROS-was:ABORTION-was: Way OT: GUNS, GUNS, AND MORE
GUNS.
>
> What if someone else fires the shutter, but you design and set
up the
> shot? Are you the photographer or is he? What if it's his
camera and
> he's get
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 09:23 PM, William Robb wrote:
Of course, by the same theory, if you have a scalpel, are you
automatically a surgeon?
William Robb
I have a camera, but I'm all too frequently not a photographer.
Dan Scott
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 09:23 PM, William Robb wrote:
No, you could borrow, rent or steal it.
I think you do have to have a camera to be a photographer
though.
What if someone else fires the shutter, but you design and set up the
shot? Are you the photographer or is he? What if i
- Original Message -
From: Dan
Subject: Re: PROS-was:ABORTION-was: Way OT: GUNS, GUNS, AND MORE
GUNS.
> Do you actually have to buy the camera?
No, you could borrow, rent or steal it.
I think you do have to have a camera to be a photographer
though.
Of course, by the same theory,
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> To be a professional photographer, you need to buy a camera and
> a business licence.
Oh crap, I knew I forgot something.
tv
> Keith Whaley wrote:
> >
> > If you family doctor was on vacation, and treated a skinned
knee,
> > would you say it was treated by a amateur?
> > Once a doctor, always a doctor.
> > The same analogy applies. If you're good enough to be ABLE
to make
> > money with your photography, and if other ph
I have an iteresting isertion here. My wife does not contribute
to PDML. When she has a technical question, she asks me, and I supply
for the most part, a PDML-approved answer. She's good. She doesn't
sweat the details. She does, however, work hard at composition and
decisive moment. She does
frank theriault wrote:
>
> You're right, Keith,
>
> I was being tongue in cheek. It was sort of my take on the Python "Argument Sketch"
> (and a bad one at that):
>
> "Ah, if my time is up, why are you still arguing?"
>
> "I could be doing it on my own time!"
>
> or words to that effect...
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 09:39 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Ah, but what if the pro is taking family snapshots on his day off? Is
he still a
pro? And would the camera he uses be a pro camera? What if he uses
the same
camera to take those snapshots as he does whilst working? Would i
If you family doctor was on vacation, and treated a skinned knee,
would you say it was treated by a amateur?
Once a doctor, always a doctor.
The same analogy applies. If you're good enough to be ABLE to make
money with your photography, and if other photographers consider you a
professional, you're
It's an important question. How could one possibly take a photograph without
knowing the answer?
-frank
Peter Alling wrote:
> Only here could someone take a flip remark and complicate it so. (Someone
> is thinking
> way too much about this). I think the short answer is yes.
>
--
"The optimi
Thanks for the brief yet concise explanation, Bruce!
I've just never made the connection, but is's ~so~ obvious - pros only use 35mm!
You're
right, I've never noticed a PJ with a view camera. And, the only pros are PJ's, right?
cheers,
frank
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> frank,
>
> Much simpler tha
Only here could someone take a flip remark and complicate it so. (Someone
is thinking
way too much about this). I think the short answer is yes.
At 10:39 PM 12/10/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Ah, but what if the pro is taking family snapshots on his day off? Is he
still a
pro? And would the camera
frank,
Much simpler than you think. 5FPS = Pro. Nikon = Pro. Canon = Pro.
Pentax = Amateur. Minolta = Amateur.
Of course, this only works with 35mm because those are the only pro
cameras. What's medium format anyway?
VBG
Bruce
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 7:39:17 PM, you wrote:
ft> Ah,
Ah, but what if the pro is taking family snapshots on his day off? Is he still a
pro? And would the camera he uses be a pro camera? What if he uses the same
camera to take those snapshots as he does whilst working? Would it only be a pro
camera while "on the job", but an amateur camera on Sunda
29 matches
Mail list logo
