Re: Pentax - [small] size matters?

2001-09-07 Thread Mark D.
From: "Chaso DeChaso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I do just happen to love Pentax optics, but actually might consider switching to Contax if it weren't for the prices and for the > backwards compatability issues with their changing mounts. As long as you're willing to stay between 28 and 100, the pric

Re: Pentax - [small] size matters?

2001-09-07 Thread Scott Astin
I have fairly average sized hands (maybe a bit on the smaller side) and the feel of the early M/ZX bodies (the 50 and the 10) were good, although a little small and fairly plasticky. They were better feeling than the C the N or the M** equivilant. With the FG battery pack on my ZX-50

Re: Pentax - [small] size matters?

2001-09-07 Thread Joseph Tainter
A few days ago I questioned trying to cram so many features into the small MZ-S, making (for me) a body that is hard to use because the controls are tiny and stiff. Then I got dumped on by another list member who likes the camera. I have two 1p bodies and like them very much. They have spoiled me

Re: Pentax - [small] size matters?

2001-09-07 Thread Rfsindg
Chaso wrote: >Something is bothering me a bit... > >SNIP >...two months ago mentioned that one fairly >consistent commonality amongst Pentaxers is a >penchant for compact bodies. The PZ bodies have >been called here an attempt of Pentax to be like >N. The MZ-S,as well as both the LX and t

RE: Pentax - [small] size matters?

2001-09-07 Thread Len Paris
Let me start out by saying that there aren't a lot of folks here that were photographers before 35mm cameras came along. To keep things modern, let's consider doing a ten or twelve hour day shooting a wedding and its ensuing reception with an RB-67 (or an RZ-67) a Stroboframe bracket, with a flas

Re: Pentax - [small] size matters?

2001-09-07 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, > Something is bothering me a bit... [...] > design objective. All this has made me wonder: am I > perhaps missing the point of Pentax cameras? yes, you probably are. Their traditional philosophy has been to produce compact bodies with a good feature set, quality build and at a price that b

Re: Pentax - [small] size matters?

2001-09-07 Thread Mark D.
From: Chaso DeChaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm drawn to Pentax for the same reason I was drawn to > Konica - for the optics I enjoy. The Konica and > Pentax 50mm lenses are my favorites. I love Pentax > lenses. Am I alone here? When we discuss bodies on > this list, I feel like I'm with the wr

Pentax - [small] size matters?

2001-09-07 Thread Chaso DeChaso
Something is bothering me a bit... I have heard repeated references to Pentax cameras vs. other brands in relation to admirably smaller size. For instance, the N F5 and C EOS-1V are decried as monsters and behemoths - as though, of course, we wouldn't one of those. And a post of perhaps