On Feb 5, 2014, at 21:04 , John Francis wrote:
> I look forward to finding out how well the new TC performs with all three
> of my DA* zooms. I was pleasantly surprised to see that it is claimed to
> work with lenses with a maximum aperture of f/4; that bodes well for the
> 60-250. I wonder wha
On Feb 2, 2014, at 09:18 , Mark Roberts wrote:
> Joseph McAllister wrote:
>
>> Definitely not a Pentax product shot, beta or whatever.
>
> In about two weeks we'll find out for certain. I'm pretty sure you're
> wrong :)
The image as announced by Pentax had a correction (more PS?) that allowed
Rob Studdert wrote:
>The Canon Lens EF 1.4X III Extender retails (from a shop that doesn't
>deep discount) at AU$529 inc 10% GST or about US$475
Yep. That Canon teleconverter sells for $499 at B&H Photo. I expect
real-world pricing of the Pentax to be right about there.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 07:59:51PM -0500, Stanley Halpin wrote:
>
> On Feb 5, 2014, at 7:45 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>
> > Zooms and TCs are not a good mix.
> >
>
> Well, we shall see if that is still true.
I found my 80-200 performed adequately with either the AF1.7x or a 1.4 TC.
I look fo
I have the A-1.4X-S, X-L and the 2.0X-L and I didn't pay anything near $600
new for any of them !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Miserere"
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
Really Mark? You expecte
The Canon Lens EF 1.4X III Extender retails (from a shop that doesn't
deep discount) at AU$529 inc 10% GST or about US$475
On 6 February 2014 14:33, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Rob Studdert wrote:
>
>>On 6 February 2014 11:54, Miserere wrote:
>>> Really Mark? You expected it to be more expensive still
Rob Studdert wrote:
>On 6 February 2014 11:54, Miserere wrote:
>> Really Mark? You expected it to be more expensive still? Jeez, I
>> thought $600 for a 1.4x TC was eye gouging enough already.
>>
>I have to agree, $600 is pretty rich but so are most of Pentax's glass
>offerings, I guess that's wh
I have to agree, $600 is pretty rich but so are most of Pentax's glass
offerings, I guess that's why I tend towards Sigma now.
On 6 February 2014 11:54, Miserere wrote:
> Really Mark? You expected it to be more expensive still? Jeez, I
> thought $600 for a 1.4x TC was eye gouging enough already.
Too many elements increases flare, lowers contrast, and lowers resolution.
TCs work better with good primes.
On 2/5/2014 7:59 PM, Stanley Halpin wrote:
On Feb 5, 2014, at 7:45 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
Zooms and TCs are not a good mix.
Well, we shall see if that is still true.
stan
On 2/
We'll see... I wouldn't be much surprised if it actually can be used
also with older bodies, even film-eating ones.
VBR, Margus
On 6.02.2014 1:26, Bruce Walker wrote:
So now we know: $599.95
PR from Ricoh quoted by dpreview contradicts some of asahi man's info.
Won't work with cameras older
Hey, you've still got one eye left...
On 2/5/2014 7:54 PM, Miserere wrote:
Really Mark? You expected it to be more expensive still? Jeez, I
thought $600 for a 1.4x TC was eye gouging enough already.
Cheers,
--M.
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.
On Feb 5, 2014, at 7:45 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
> Zooms and TCs are not a good mix.
>
Well, we shall see if that is still true.
stan
>
> On 2/5/2014 6:41 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> I didn't see the DA* 50-135 listed for either compatible or incompatible.
>> Did I miss it somehow??
>>
>> --
>>
Really Mark? You expected it to be more expensive still? Jeez, I
thought $600 for a 1.4x TC was eye gouging enough already.
Cheers,
--M.
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 5 February 2014 18:32, Mark
Zooms and TCs are not a good mix.
On 2/5/2014 6:41 PM, Bruce wrote:
I didn't see the DA* 50-135 listed for either compatible or incompatible. Did
I miss it somehow??
--
Bruce
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 5, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
So now we know: $599.95
I’m in.
On Feb 5, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>> So now we know: $599.95
>>
>> PR from Ricoh quoted by dpreview contradicts some of asahi man's info.
>> Won't work with cameras older than K-7. Cameras will need firmware
>> update.
>>
>> http://www.dpreview.
Bruce wrote:
>I didn't see the DA* 50-135 listed for either compatible or incompatible. Did
>I miss it somehow??
It's listed. 5th one down.
>>> http://www.dpreview.com/news/2014/02/05/ricoh-announces-hd-pentax-da-af-1-4x-aw-rear-converter
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.rober
I didn't see the DA* 50-135 listed for either compatible or incompatible. Did
I miss it somehow??
--
Bruce
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 5, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>> So now we know: $599.95
>>
>> PR from Ricoh quoted by dpreview contradicts some of as
Bruce Walker wrote:
>So now we know: $599.95
>
>PR from Ricoh quoted by dpreview contradicts some of asahi man's info.
>Won't work with cameras older than K-7. Cameras will need firmware
>update.
>
>http://www.dpreview.com/news/2014/02/05/ricoh-announces-hd-pentax-da-af-1-4x-aw-rear-converter
Tha
So now we know: $599.95
PR from Ricoh quoted by dpreview contradicts some of asahi man's info.
Won't work with cameras older than K-7. Cameras will need firmware
update.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2014/02/05/ricoh-announces-hd-pentax-da-af-1-4x-aw-rear-converter
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:25 P
Additional converter details today from "asahi man":
"TC is ready and works perfect,good quality,needs no firmware
update,cause all IDs are in the TC."
"Works with "all Pentax cams".
Source(s):
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3618741?page=2#forum-post-53048033
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/
Joseph McAllister wrote:
>Definitely not a Pentax product shot, beta or whatever.
In about two weeks we'll find out for certain. I'm pretty sure you're
wrong :)
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/
On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:42 , steve harley wrote:
> on 2014-01-27 12:20 Mark Roberts wrote
>> I think the text on the barrel was Photoshopped in but I think it's a
>> genuine Pentax product shot done from a pre-production prototype.
>
> i think the whole thing is a fake; every detail of mount surf
I just tried my DA 16-45 with a Sigma 1.4 AF teleconverter on a Pz-1p.
There is little light falloff visible in the viewfinder and any focal
lengeth, though I don't think I can reach a conclusion based on that. I
don't trust my eyes to see a couple EV in light drop off, which would be
pretty o
On 1/28/2014 2:17 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
On 1/28/2014 9:45 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:40:19AM -0500, Ken Waller wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Bruce Walker"
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converte
> Ah shit. So Hoya fired the guy who created my fave lens, the DA*
> 55/1.4. Unbelievable. What a bunch of maroons.
He probably didn't want to do endoscopes.
>>> That's just an innuendo.
>> Its also a slippery slope
> Will these endoscope jokes ever be behind us
"Ken Waller" wrote:
>> On 1/28/2014 9:45 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:40:19AM -0500, Ken Waller wrote:
>>>>> - Original Message - From: "Bruc
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "P.J. Alling"
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
On 1/28/2014 9:45 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:40:19AM
These jokes could have been funny but this list just wrecked em.
Rectum, hell it dam near kills them.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
These jokes could have been
/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
New information:
Asahi Man says the new teleconverter is an update of one designed
under Hoya (in 2008) but never put into production. He also indicates
there are considerable electron
On 1/28/2014 9:45 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:40:19AM -0500, Ken Waller wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Bruce Walker"
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Ma
On 1/28/2014 9:24 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
New information:
Asahi Man says the new teleconverter is an update of one designed
under Hoya (in 2008) but never put into production. He also indicates
there are considerable electronics inside the converter which will
necessitate firmware updates for c
These jokes could have been funny but this list just wrecked em.
On January 28, 2014 7:53:03 AM PST, Paul Stenquist
wrote:
>
>On Jan 28, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi
>wrote:
>
>>
He probably didn't want to do endoscopes.
>>>
>>> That's just an innuendo.
>>
>>
Remind me never to be the butt of your jokes.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi
wrote:
>
>>> He probably didn't want to do endoscopes.
>>
>> That's just an innuendo.
>
> Its also a slippery slope
Will these endoscope jokes ever be behind us?
>>>
>>> W
On Jan 28, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>>> He probably didn't want to do endoscopes.
>>
>> That's just an innuendo.
>
> Its also a slippery slope
Will these endoscope jokes ever be behind us?
>>>
>>> We have not touched bottom.
>>>
>> I think
>> He probably didn't want to do endoscopes.
>
> That's just an innuendo.
Its also a slippery slope
>>>
>>> Will these endoscope jokes ever be behind us?
>>
>> We have not touched bottom.
>>
> I think you've put your finger on it.
Hmm. That must be the end.
--
PDML Pe
>>> >>He probably didn't want to do endoscopes.
>>> >
>>> >That's just an innuendo.
>>>
>>> Its also a slippery slope
>>
>> Will these endoscope jokes ever be behind us?
>
>We have not touched bottom.
>
I think you've put your finger on it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://p
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:40:19AM -0500, Ken Waller wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "Bruce Walker"
>>
>> Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
>>
>> >On Mon, Jan 27, 2014
New information:
Asahi Man says the new teleconverter is an update of one designed
under Hoya (in 2008) but never put into production. He also indicates
there are considerable electronics inside the converter which will
necessitate firmware updates for cameras to be able to sue it.
--
PDML Penta
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:40:19AM -0500, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
> - Original Message - From: "Bruce Walker"
>
> Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
>
>
> >On Mon, Jan 27, 2014
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Walker"
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Bruce Walker
wrote:
Ah shit. So Hoya
I hope this 1.4x does not act as a pseudo-adapter. Canon did that way back
with their early DSLRs.
Did not go over very well, though their adaptation was handled than what is
talked about here.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSU
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>> Ah shit. So Hoya fired the guy who created my fave lens, the DA*
>> 55/1.4. Unbelievable. What a bunch of maroons.
>
> He probably didn't want to do endoscopes.
That's just an innuend
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:28 PM, John wrote:
> I expect it is "full-frame" in the sense that it would not vignette the
> image from a "full-frame" lens. I don't see how it would make an APS-C
> lens have a larger image circle.
You can demonstrate it for yourself with a card held behind the lens
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Ah shit. So Hoya fired the guy who created my fave lens, the DA*
> 55/1.4. Unbelievable. What a bunch of maroons.
He probably didn't want to do endoscopes.
("The bokeh looks like shit!")
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
Ah shit. So Hoya fired the guy who created my fave lens, the DA*
55/1.4. Unbelievable. What a bunch of maroons.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> Unrelated to the 1.4x, but I've been reviewing the recent posts of
> Asahi Man on dpreview. He recently said this:
> "Yes, Ricoh is
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:28 PM, John wrote:
> I expect it is "full-frame" in the sense that it would not vignette the
> image from a "full-frame" lens. I don't see how it would make an APS-C
> lens have a larger image circle.
Enlarging the image is what teleconverters do. If it doesn't vignette
more or less as much as needed
by a 24x36mm image (unless it is vignetted by some hardware).
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: John
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 10:28 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
On 1/27/2014 3:21 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Mon
vignetted by some hardware).
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: John
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 10:28 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
On 1/27/2014 3:21 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Dario Bonazza
wrote:
Great, but
On 1/27/2014 3:21 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Dario Bonazza
wrote:
Great, but what's the point of spreading the same amount of light
gathered by the same front lens on a larger sensor having say the
same pixel count (e.g. 24 MP) while losing one stop for exposure?
Unrelated to the 1.4x, but I've been reviewing the recent posts of
Asahi Man on dpreview. He recently said this:
"Yes, Ricoh is the best for Pentax since a very long time.Hoya...Hoya
fired Jun Hirakawa...Anybody knows who Jun Hirakawa is?"
Well I didn't, but I do now: http://camerapedia.wikia.com/
on 2014-01-27 13:53 Dario Bonazza wrote
Don't you think such images supplied at the time of news releases can just be
photo-realistic renderings?
to produce images prior to production, i would think Ricoh would render from a
3D model rather than sloppily paste together a mount, a body and some
nazza
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 9:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
No, the 14mm x 1.4x will become a 19.6mm f/4 in itself, whichever
camera (if
any) you put behind it.
In case the resulting image will be large enough to cover the 24x36mm
format
(not yet
tical perspective,
reflections and all. You could superimpose them perfectly. Suspect, to me.
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: Dario Bonazza
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 9:53 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
Don't you think such images supplied at t
on 2014-01-27 13:44 Darren Addy wrote
I would think that also, except for the fact that Asahi Man is saying
the things that he is saying.
as poor Asahi Man's reputation is on the line, i will allow that the product
may be real, but the image is a simulation
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Don't you think such images supplied at the time of news releases can just
be photo-realistic renderings?
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: steve harley
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 9:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
on 2014-01-27 12:20
I would think that also, except for the fact that Asahi Man is saying
the things that he is saying.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:42 PM, steve harley wrote:
> on 2014-01-27 12:20 Mark Roberts wrote
>
>> I think the text on the barrel was Photoshopped in but I think it's a
>> genuine Pentax product sh
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> I don't have a 1.4x to test here at work with me, but I'm pretty sure
> that would allow it to cover the corners at 24-63mm also.
Note that DA lenses have to have an image circle somewhat larger than
APS-C, in order to accommodate sensor move
on 2014-01-27 12:20 Mark Roberts wrote
I think the text on the barrel was Photoshopped in but I think it's a
genuine Pentax product shot done from a pre-production prototype.
i think the whole thing is a fake; every detail of mount surface has highlights
indicating a light source to the left,
ens on a larger sensor having say the same pixel count
>>> (e.g. 24 MP) while losing one stop for exposure?
>>>
>>>
>>> Dario
>>>
>>>
>>> -Messaggio originale- From: Dario Bonazza
>>> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 9:08 PM
gt;>
>>
>> Dario
>>
>>
>> -Messaggio originale- From: Dario Bonazza
>> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 9:08 PM
>>
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
>>
>> In other words, a 14mm x 1.4x
Someone suggests taking any 1.4x teleconverter and putting one of the
problematic (non-full-frame-covering) DA lenses on a full frame Pentax
film camera and seeing what it looks like.
So I just took a DA 16-45mm and stuck it on a ME body. Vignettes hard
at the corners at 16mm. Then I put a Rear Co
>>
>>
>> Dario
>>
>>
>> -----Messaggio originale- From: Dario Bonazza
>> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 9:08 PM
>>
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
>>
>> In other words, a 14mm x 1.4x becomes
; Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 9:08 PM
>
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
>
> In other words, a 14mm x 1.4x becomes a true 19.6mm lens - hence
> irrespectively of sensor size - and not an "equivalent to XY mm" on a given
> format.
&
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Dario Bonazza
wrote:
> Great, but what's the point of spreading the same amount of light gathered by
> the same front lens on a larger sensor having say the same pixel count (e.g.
> 24 MP) while losing one stop for exposure?
To smooth the transition for people
-Messaggio originale-
From: Dario Bonazza
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 9:08 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
In other words, a 14mm x 1.4x becomes a true 19.6mm lens - hence
irrespectively of sensor size - and not an "equivalent to XY mm" on a given
for
s whether such a combo of lens and TC will give
> an image circle covering 24x36mm format or not.
> Dario
>
> -Messaggio originale- From: Dario Bonazza
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 9:04 PM
>
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
>
>
You are close. What get's cancelled out is that the effective FOV
becomes close to the actual FOV of the converted lens. But the focal
length and speed changes (1.4x and 1 stop of light).
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Alastair Robertson
wrote:
> wouldn't the lack of a 1.54 crop factor that APC
ot.
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: Dario Bonazza
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 9:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
No, the 14mm x 1.4x will become a 19.6mm f/4 in itself, whichever camera (if
any) you put behind it.
In case the resulting image will be large
-
From: Alastair Robertson
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 8:54 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.4x converter
wouldn't the lack of a 1.54 crop factor that APC-S sensor cameras have
over 35mm frame more-or-less cancel out the 1.4x converter effect so
that a DA14mm + 1.4TC
wouldn't the lack of a 1.54 crop factor that APC-S sensor cameras have
over 35mm frame more-or-less cancel out the 1.4x converter effect so
that a DA14mm + 1.4TC on a 35mm frame would end up being a 14/1.54 x
1.4 = 12.7mm FOV on full frame?
Alastair
On 28 January 2014 08:42, Darren Addy wrote:
>
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> (which he says Pentax is calling a "Full Frame Converter")
WUTT
If this is true, is it possible that the converter will allow DA
lenses (that don't quite cover full frame) to cover them adequately
(albeit at 1.4x the focal length). This wou
"CollinB" wrote:
>On Mon Jan 27 10:08:24 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>>On 1/26/2014 12:08 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
>>>
>http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-14x-sdm-teleconverter-surfaces.html
>>>
>>> I was looking at the picture and something bothered me.
>>> The curvature of the text does n
On Mon Jan 27 10:08:24 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>On 1/26/2014 12:08 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
>>
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-14x-sdm-teleconverter-surfaces.html
>>
>> I was looking at the picture and something bothered me.
>> The curvature of the text does not match the curvature of
On 1/26/2014 12:08 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-14x-sdm-teleconverter-surfaces.html
I was looking at the picture and something bothered me.
The curvature of the text does not match the curvature of the tc body.
The item may exist, but that picture is not
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-14x-sdm-teleconverter-surfaces.html
I was looking at the picture and something bothered me.
The curvature of the text does not match the curvature of the tc body.
The item may exist, but that picture is not of a real object.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
Stanley Halpin wrote:
>I do not frequent the PF, I only see things there when someone here provides
>a link. So I have no way to evaluate the credibility of this rumor.
It's been confirmed by a guy who goes by the moniker of "Asahi Man" on
DP Review's Pentax board. Asahi Man seems to have some w
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Miserere wrote:
> I found my Tamron 1.4x TC worked just fine.
With SDM? I've got one, that everyone says works with SDM, and I don't
find it to work that well at all with my DA* 300/4.
The optical quality is good, but whenever the camera attempts to AF,
it overs
Miserere wrote:
>That didn't take them long, did it? How long have people been
>*pleading* for one of these? 5 years? 7 years?
>
>I found my Tamron 1.4x TC worked just fine.
I expect this TC to be *much* better than the Tamron. And to be very
expensive.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimed
That didn't take them long, did it? How long have people been
*pleading* for one of these? 5 years? 7 years?
I found my Tamron 1.4x TC worked just fine.
Cheers,
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On
Ditto.
Paul via phone
> On Jan 25, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Stanley Halpin
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 25, 2014, at 4:16 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
>>
>> Is that your dream?
>> http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/16-pentax-news-rumors/249449-image-hd-pentax-1-4x-teleconverter.html
>> Are you sure?
>>
>>
On Jan 25, 2014, at 4:16 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
> Is that your dream?
> http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/16-pentax-news-rumors/249449-image-hd-pentax-1-4x-teleconverter.html
> Are you sure?
>
> Dario
>
I do not frequent the PF, I only see things there when someone here provides a
link.
Is that your dream?
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/16-pentax-news-rumors/249449-image-hd-pentax-1-4x-teleconverter.html
Are you sure?
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link dir
82 matches
Mail list logo
