Mick Maguire wrote:
Is this lens any good? what's it best suited for
(portraiture etc)? Is it a reasonable buy at $165?
any thoughts / opinions anybody?
Is it true that *nobody* on this list has an opinion on this lens?? Or are
you all just ignoring me?
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is
On Thursday, December 13, 2001, at 08:46 AM, Mick Maguire wrote:
Is it true that *nobody* on this list has an opinion on this lens?? Or
are
you all just ignoring me?
I'm not ignoring you, I just don't have one and have never used one. ;)
Why don't you buy a nice SMC-A* 200mm f2.8? Now
At 21:46 13/12/01, you wrote:
Hi Mick
I missed your earlier post in all the noise. :-)
My 135/2.8 F series lens isn't used anywhere near enough. I use it as a
short telephoto, mainly shooting horse racing, and mainly at night. I have
no complaints with the lens at all. I haven't really used
...
-Original Message-
From: Karasch,John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:27 AM
To: 'Mick Maguire '
Subject: RE: Pentax SMC-F 135 f2.8
I've had a 135 2.8 for more than 10 years, used mostly for portraits. It
may not be the perfect lense for that purpose
]
Subject: RE: Pentax SMC-F 135 f2.8
At 21:46 13/12/01, you wrote:
Hi Mick
I missed your earlier post in all the noise. :-)
My 135/2.8 F series lens isn't used anywhere near enough. I use it as a
short telephoto, mainly shooting horse racing, and mainly at night. I have
no complaints with the lens
Sorry for mis-spelling your name Jon. :-/
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Mick Maguire wrote:
Mick Maguire wrote:
Is this lens any good? what's it best suited for
(portraiture etc)? Is it a reasonable buy at $165?
any thoughts / opinions anybody?
Is it true that *nobody* on this list has an opinion on this lens?? Or are
you all just ignoring me?
Well,
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax SMC-F 135 f2.8
Mick Maguire wrote:
Thanks Tom... I can feel my fingers getting itchier by the minute
You really should just do it. Think of it: you'd be the only person on
pdml with the F version. You'd be a celebrity.
Plus you'd have an excellent
Mick wrote:
Thanks John :) I was getting paranoid at the silence... I too am an amateur
and am working on a tight budget so cant afford the likes of the limited
lenses, so I really tend to look at the bargain end of the spectrum.
Perhaps I should break out my old screw mount equipment LOL
Jon Hope wrote:
At 03:40 14/12/01, you wrote:
Does that mean I am a celebrity? I already own the F series 135/2.8. H,
nup, I gather not. LOL
Can I have your autograph?
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Is this lens any good? what's it best suited for (portraiture etc)? Is it a
reasonable buy at $165? any thoughts / opinions anybody?
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
NO it's not it's garbage, don't get it. Now tell me
where you saw it so I get instead :-)
--- Mick Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this lens any good? what's it best suited for
(portraiture etc)? Is it a
reasonable buy at $165? any thoughts / opinions
anybody?
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
Brendan wrote:
NO it's not it's garbage, don't get it. Now tell
me where you saw it so I get instead :-)
Errrmmm thanks Brendan! :-/
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
13 matches
Mail list logo
