Re: Photo CDs

2002-04-28 Thread Aaron Reynolds
On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 11:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Speaking of negative and slide scanners, the price Club here in Canada > has a > line in stock I never heard of for only $199. Cdn. For you Americans > that's > pretty damn cheap. The box says it has a 4.2 dmax. Not bad Wh

Re: Photo CDs

2002-04-26 Thread Pentxuser
Speaking of negative and slide scanners, the price Club here in Canada has a line in stock I never heard of for only $199. Cdn. For you Americans that's pretty damn cheap. The box says it has a 4.2 dmax. Not bad - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http

RE: Photo CDs

2002-04-26 Thread Brendan
ure CD? Maybe. > > Len > --- > > -Original Message- > From: Treena Harp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Photo CDs > > > For those of you who get images on photo CDs, is > there eno

Re: Photo CDs

2002-04-26 Thread Nick Wright
EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Photo CDs >Date: Fri, Apr 26, 2002, 1:28 PM > > For those of you who get images on photo CDs, is there enough resolution for > a photo-quality 8x10? I've been wanting to practice retouching, but it's a > rea

RE: Photo CDs

2002-04-26 Thread Paris, Leonard
A Photo CD? Absolutely. A Picture CD? Maybe. Len --- -Original Message- From: Treena Harp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Photo CDs For those of you who get images on photo CDs, is there enough resolution for a photo

Re: Photo CDs

2001-10-04 Thread Kenneth Waller
rsday, October 04, 2001 12:07 PM Subject: Re: Photo CDs > Rich wrote: > << I tried getting a roll of film developed straight to a CD for the first time yesterday. I forget the brand name, but it wasn't a Kodak PhotoCD. The files on the CD were .jpg images, approximately 1480x1035, 24

RE: Photo CDs

2001-10-04 Thread Richard Klein
from the prints or from the negatives. Perhaps if I ask the right questions they'd scan straight from the negatives next time. -Rich William Robb wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Richard Klein" > Subject: Photo CDs > > > > I tried

Re: Photo CDs

2001-10-04 Thread Chris Brogden
lor. I was a bit disappointed because that > resolution doesn't allow for much zooming and cropping before you run > into blatant pixellation. Is this the same for all photo CDs, or > could I do better going with another lab? Both PictureCD and the PhotoNet CD scan to 1536x1024. You can re

Re: Photo CDs

2001-10-04 Thread Anand DHUPKAR
atile enough. >From: Richard Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: "Pentax Discussion Mailing List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Photo CDs >Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 07:42:46 -0400 > >I tried getting a roll of film developed stra

Re: Photo CDs

2001-10-04 Thread David J Brooks
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 07:42:46 -0400 To: "Pentax Discussion Mailing List (E-mail)" Subject: Photo CDs I tried getting a roll of film developed straight to a CD for the first time yesterday.  I forget the brand name, but it wasn't a Kodak PhotoCD.  The f

Re: Photo CDs

2001-10-04 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Richard Klein" Subject: Photo CDs > I tried getting a roll of film developed straight to a CD for the first time > yesterday. I forget the brand name, but it wasn't a Kodak PhotoCD. The > files on the CD were .jpg images, approxi

Photo CDs

2001-10-04 Thread Richard Klein
w for much zooming and cropping before you run into blatant pixellation. Is this the same for all photo CDs, or could I do better going with another lab? -Rich - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't