On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 11:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Speaking of negative and slide scanners, the price Club here in Canada
> has a
> line in stock I never heard of for only $199. Cdn. For you Americans
> that's
> pretty damn cheap. The box says it has a 4.2 dmax. Not bad
Wh
Speaking of negative and slide scanners, the price Club here in Canada has a
line in stock I never heard of for only $199. Cdn. For you Americans that's
pretty damn cheap. The box says it has a 4.2 dmax. Not bad
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http
ure CD? Maybe.
>
> Len
> ---
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Treena Harp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Photo CDs
>
>
> For those of you who get images on photo CDs, is
> there eno
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Photo CDs
>Date: Fri, Apr 26, 2002, 1:28 PM
>
> For those of you who get images on photo CDs, is there enough resolution for
> a photo-quality 8x10? I've been wanting to practice retouching, but it's a
> rea
A Photo CD? Absolutely. A Picture CD? Maybe.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Treena Harp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 1:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Photo CDs
For those of you who get images on photo CDs, is there enough resolution for
a photo
rsday, October 04, 2001 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: Photo CDs
> Rich wrote:
> << I tried getting a roll of film developed straight to a CD for the first
time yesterday. I forget the brand name, but it wasn't a Kodak PhotoCD.
The files on the CD were .jpg images, approximately 1480x1035, 24
from the prints or from
the negatives. Perhaps if I ask the right questions they'd scan straight
from the negatives next time.
-Rich
William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Richard Klein"
> Subject: Photo CDs
>
>
> > I tried
lor. I was a bit disappointed because that
> resolution doesn't allow for much zooming and cropping before you run
> into blatant pixellation. Is this the same for all photo CDs, or
> could I do better going with another lab?
Both PictureCD and the PhotoNet CD scan to 1536x1024. You can re
atile
enough.
>From: Richard Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "Pentax Discussion Mailing List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Photo CDs
>Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 07:42:46 -0400
>
>I tried getting a roll of film developed stra
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 07:42:46 -0400
To: "Pentax Discussion Mailing List (E-mail)"
Subject: Photo CDs
I tried getting a roll of film developed straight to a CD for the
first time
yesterday. I forget the brand name, but it wasn't a Kodak
PhotoCD. The
f
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Klein"
Subject: Photo CDs
> I tried getting a roll of film developed straight to a CD for
the first time
> yesterday. I forget the brand name, but it wasn't a Kodak
PhotoCD. The
> files on the CD were .jpg images, approxi
w for much
zooming and cropping before you run into blatant pixellation. Is this the
same for all photo CDs, or could I do better going with another lab?
-Rich
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
12 matches
Mail list logo