Would an Auto 110 (or even a Super) be an option? its a fine little camera,
with quite a rnage of lenses (sharp too!)
T.
At 11:53 24/05/2001 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>You are gracious, Dan. Truth be old, the only cameras I've used, other than
>a couple consumer-oriented point-and-shoots
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You might want to do as I did: Spend a couple weekends as follows:
Hi Paul ...
Ive downloaded everything that was of interest on Gandy's site.
Thanks for all the other pointers.
> The Leica CL, Minolta CLE, and Contax G are not pocketable. Shel already
> has a grea
Autofocus is a no-no. Zoom lenses are a no-no. Not being able to
set my own exposure is a no-no. While a meter might be nice, I'd
have to be able to control it completely, including turning it off
and still being able to set exposure, otherwise a meter will only
get in the way. Thanks for putti
On 23 May 2001, at 18:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The highly regarded 28mm, f/2.8 Ricoh GR1, like the 28/3.5 Olympus XA-4 of
> the 1980s, offers full-program exposure only--no program shift. Even if it
> allows exposure compensation, you're at the mercy of the program that Ricoh has
> built in
Dan,
Thanks for brining the lineup up-to-date. I was unaware that you could get
spot metering on a contemporary compact.
With most the models that you've named have fine lenses and other strong
points, their extensive automation makes them a different breed from the
flexible manual-focus models
Hi Shel,
Paul covered the original compacts very thoroughly. If you are looking for
something of more recent vintage you might want to check out some of these
(all feature exp. compensation, many have adj. diopters, spot metering, and
metal bodies):
Ricoh GR1s, 28mm (Camera Traders Ltd. has lowe
Forgot to mention, all of these do violate your no autofocus, but a few
offer both.
Have fun,
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
"Provencher, Paul M." wrote:
>
> How big is your pocket?
Depends on the shirt I'm wearing. I'd like to be able to carry the
camera in a small shirt pocket or in my jeans.
> How big is your pocketbook?
My pocketbook is huge, although now it's pretty close to empty. I
don't want to spend more
How big is your pocket?
How big is your pocketbook?
:-)
Paul M. Provencher
(being impertinent)
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 7:30 PM
To: Pentax List
Subject: Pocketable Camera
I'm looking for a small, pocketable,
Hi Shel,
I use an Olympus XA-2. It's very small, has a sliding cover for the 35mm
f3.5 Zuiko, built-in lens which means it really does fit in a pocket, has
a fully de-mountable flash, 3-setting focus, ISO dial-in from 25-800,
self-timer, very quiet electronic shutter. Where I go, it goes.
The
Minox 35 GT!!! just got mine and its perfect :-))
Daphne
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: May 22, 2001 5:29 PM
Subject: Pocketable Camera
> I'm looking for a small, pocketable, full-frame 35mm camera,
perhaps
> a bit sma
I'm looking for a small, pocketable, full-frame 35mm camera, perhaps
a bit smaller than the Canon GIII. Requirements are:
Minimal features (built-in meter that can be overridden would be
nice)
Quiet, unobtrusive operation
Minimum shutter lag - prefer focal plane shutter w/up to 1/1000
No pop-up
13 matches
Mail list logo