mike wilson wrote:
>> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> mike wilson wrote:
>>
>>>He eliminated (many of) those in-camera. The point is still that
>>>3000 files is not the same as 3000 prints or slides. Produce
>>>equal numbers of the same end product before you tell me that
>>> it is che
I have seen exactly that in both my own children's shooting habits and
my wedding/portrait work. I'm seeing less and less print ordering,
but lots of web galleries or computer based slideshows.
The digital angle makes this much easier, as the natural medium for it
is a computer monitor. The cost
Well put.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> There's nothing wrong with that logic because, odd as it may seem to
> old 20th-century farts like you and me, the print is no longer the
> preferred medium for viewing photographs,
Mark Roberts wrote:
> mike wilson wrote:
>
>
>>>From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>mike wilson wrote:
>>>
>>>
He eliminated (many of) those in-camera. The point is still that
3000 files is not the same as 3000 prints or slides. Produce
equal numbers of the same end product be
Mark Roberts wrote:
> Personally, I *love* good prints. I love making good prints
> and viewing them. [...] the only time I make a print is when
> it's going to be 8 x 12 or larger.
Same here. And I surely don't need a print of every frame I shoot. The
3,000 shots I took last weekend are going
Doug Franklin wrote:
>Now, why in the world would I want prints of 2,000 photos I don't think
>are up to snuff? The only bunch I /might/ want small prints of would
>be the ones that survived the first two culls.
Sometimes we forget that in the pre-digital world there were a lot of
prints made
At 09:38 AM 15/11/2007, Mark Roberts wrote:
>Doug Franklin wrote:
>
> >Now, why in the world would I want prints of 2,000 photos I don't think
> >are up to snuff? The only bunch I /might/ want small prints of would
> >be the ones that survived the first two culls.
>
>Sometimes we forget that in th
Mark Roberts wrote:
> Personally, I *love* good prints. I love making good prints
> and viewing them. [...] the only time I make a print is when
> it's going to be 8 x 12 or larger.
Same here. But I do occasionally make smaller prints too.
There's something to be said for a pocket book of photos.
Mark Roberts wrote:
> mike wilson wrote:
>
>
>>> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> mike wilson wrote:
>>>
>>>
He eliminated (many of) those in-camera. The point is still that
3000 files is not the same as 3000 prints or slides. Produce
equal numbers of the same en
Toralf Lund wrote:
>I don't know. I've heard many people talk about how they miss their
>family album now that they've switched to digital.
By talking about people who have *switched* to digital you've
automatically excluded the age group I'm talking about :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:03:03 -0800
> Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> > Personally, I *love* good prints. I love making good prints
> > and viewing them. [...] the only time I make a print is when
> > it's going to be 8 x 12 or larger.
>
> Same here. But I do occasionally make smaller p
But if someone really likes a print, you can just give it to them, I
don't think I'd be giving away my iPod, (if I had one that is).
Jim King wrote:
> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:03:03 -0800
>
>
>> Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Personally, I *love* good prints. I love makin
Jim King wrote:
> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:03:03 -0800
>
>> Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>>> Personally, I *love* good prints. I love making good prints
>>> and viewing them. [...] the only time I make a print is when
>>> it's going to be 8 x 12 or larger.
>> Same here. But I do occasi
In a message dated 11/15/2007 12:23:27 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know. I've heard many people talk about how they miss their
family album now that they've switched to digital.
- T
===
I don't agree with everyone that the print will disappear, for t
John Francis wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 08:56:16AM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> Toralf Lund wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I don't know. I've heard many people talk about how they miss their
>>> family album now that they've switched to digital.
>>>
>> By talking about people who have *
Mark Roberts wrote:
> Toralf Lund wrote:
>
>
>> I don't know. I've heard many people talk about how they miss their
>> family album now that they've switched to digital.
>>
>
> By talking about people who have *switched* to digital you've
> automatically excluded the age group I'm talkin
It's in the iPhone's address book if they're using it properly.
G
On Nov 15, 2007, at 11:15 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> If they remember their e-mail address, that is.
>
> Adam Maas wrote:
>> But if it's an iPhone (Essentially the same as the iPod Touch,
>> just with a phone and email) you can j
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 08:56:16AM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Toralf Lund wrote:
>
> >I don't know. I've heard many people talk about how they miss their
> >family album now that they've switched to digital.
>
> By talking about people who have *switched* to digital you've
> automatically ex
But if it's an iPhone (Essentially the same as the iPod Touch, just with a
phone and email) you can just email it to them ;-)
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
> But if someone really likes a print, you can just give it to them, I
> don't think I'd be giving away my iPod, (if I had one that is).
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "John Francis"
Subject: Re: Prints (was: Paid For)
> Digital is making inroads at the other end of the age spectrum, too.
> My mother (90 a couple of weeks ago) has severe arthritis, and would
> find turning the pages in a photo album
On Nov 15, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 15/11/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> I recently purchased a new plasma television. One can insert an SD
>> card into
>> a slot on the thing and get a slide show of the contents
>> (providing the
>> contents are jpegs.).
>
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: Prints (was: Paid For)
> On 15/11/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>I recently purchased a new plasma television. One can insert an SD card
>>into
>>a slot on the thing and get a slide s
If they remember their e-mail address, that is.
Adam Maas wrote:
> But if it's an iPhone (Essentially the same as the iPod Touch, just with a
> phone and email) you can just email it to them ;-)
>
> -Adam
>
>
> P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>> But if someone really likes a print, you can just give it
On 15/11/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I recently purchased a new plasma television. One can insert an SD card into
>a slot on the thing and get a slide show of the contents (providing the
>contents are jpegs.).
Yah, I have a hard disk recorder / DVD with this. I tried it a
William Robb wrote:
>I'm thinking I should run a cable from my computer over to the TV.
>The controls aren't that bad on my TV though.
>It's kind of strange that it doesn't just start a slide show when a
card is
>inserted, since there really is no other reason to put one into the
slot
>than to
Prints and iPod Touch viewing are different experiences. Both are
quite good, however, just different.
Godfrey
On Nov 15, 2007, at 7:48 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> But if someone really likes a print, you can just give it to them, I
> don't think I'd be giving away my iPod, (if I had one that is
Yes, there will be prints, just like there will be film. My wife is a
scrapbooker - for her recent birthday, I got her a new scrapbooking
program. But there are many more capabilities than just creating
printed pages. You can email a scrapbook to someone else, you can
create an html scrapbook to
On 11/15/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/11/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I recently purchased a new plasma television. One can insert an SD card into
> >a slot on the thing and get a slide show of the contents (providing the
> >contents are jpegs.).
>
> Yah, I
28 matches
Mail list logo
