on 04/18/02 07:57, Stephen Moore opined:
> The MZ-S is the top-of-line AF body, with the latest,
> fastest, most evolved version of the SAFOX system, right?
For a Pentax, fes. But a few development steps behind the other makes. Most
likely to keep the price down, it has no eye-tracking to 18 dif
Stephen;
Predictive AF would be usefull for racing photography because it keeps a
moving subject in focus as the shutter is tripped. Trap focus could be
usefull as well in racing because you could set the focus on a pre-determined
part of the track and the shutter will trip automagically when
Hi Stephen,
Stephen wrote:
SM> From what I've gathered reading the list, some of the other
SM> bodies (with older SAFOX) can do more "tricks."
Not true: Safox-7 supersedes previous versions in all respects.
SM> For example,
SM> can somebody explain in words of few syllables what "trap
In a message dated 4/18/2002 9:58:34 AM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> For example,
> can somebody explain in words of few syllables what "trap
> focus" means, and how important it is? What about "predictive
> AF" and "focus confirmation?" Are these more properly referred
As some here already know ("Held an MZ-S Last Night"),
my eyesight's been making me think about autofocus, and
now I'm confused. (I must confess that, over the year-and-
something I've been reading PDML, I've given only passing
attention to AF-related posts, and now the inattention
has come back t
5 matches
Mail list logo
