On 1 June 2015 at 15:12, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
This sounds like a concept designed to fire the imagination and raise
money,
Yep
but if you think about it, it is probably a little flawed.
Really? It looks pretty well thought out to me. I think most of what
you're wondering
This sounds like a concept designed to fire the imagination and raise
money, but if you think about it, it is probably a little flawed.
First of all, how does it maintain a desired vector, relative to the
subject? I can see how it might maintain the proper distance, but how
do you choose/maintain
Horses? Noise? You don't need noise. I had a horse bolt on me catching
sight of waving cloth out of the corner of it's eye. It doesn't take
much strange to get on a horses nerves.
On 6/1/2015 1:31 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
A very creative new camera idea- not actually
P.J. Alling wrote:
Horses? Noise? You don't need noise. I had a horse bolt on me catching
sight of waving cloth out of the corner of it's eye. It doesn't take
much strange to get on a horses nerves.
Very much aware of this; the horse my wife currently rides is terrified of
domestic wheeled
Ken Waller wrote:
A very creative new camera idea- not actually available now, they
apparaently need seed money to make it happen.
https://www.lily.camera/
In the more open patches of forest land and along certain waterway paths, I
can see this being a really useful viewpoint for mountain
Quoting Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com:
A very creative new camera idea- not actually available now, they
apparaently need seed money to make it happen.
https://www.lily.camera/
Obviously for the 'selfie obsessed'...
Interesting concept, though.
--
Cheers
Brian
6 matches
Mail list logo
