On 29 Jan 2001, at 20:30, SETH wrote:
> The Bessa-L with Super-wide Heliar (15mm) combo is probably the most
> economical and lightest choice. It is not any more flare prone than
> Pentax 15/3.5 and much less so than the new Tamron 14/2.8.
Two more issue relating to the use of ultra-wides on no
Hi!
Years ago I bought Zenitar K 16/2,8 - It`s made in Russia
and I am very
happy with it. And it's cheap too - only
1100 EEK ( 1 $ = 10 EEK when I purchased it ).
Cheers , Raivo
---
Current Moscow price ~$80.
Last year I heard some rumours about russian people who sell
it in internet (~$150).
Hi !
Years ago I bought Zenitar K 16/2,8 - It`s made in Russia and I am very
happy with it. And it's cheap too - only
1100 EEK ( 1 $ = 10 EEK when I purchased it ).
Cheers , Raivo
homepage http://home.delfi.ee/tiikmaa
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
At 01:43 30.1.2001 EST, Mafud wrote:
>Does anyone *regularly* use hyperfocussing with their wide angle lenses?
Yes, I do with the SMC 15/3.5. It is the only lens I have which can be
used regularly with this feature :-)
Antti-Pekka
---
* Antti-Pekka Virjonen * Fiskarsinkatu 7 D * GSM: +358
At 22:40 29.1.2001 +0800, Chi-Wai wrote:
>I always bring along with my Pentax FA20/f2.8 for taking landscape
>photographs. I satified with the results very much. Now, I would like to
>buy another ultra-wide angle lens of either 15mm or 17mm, preferably an
>automatic and fixed-focus lens. Does anyo
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:40:23 +1300, "David A. Mann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mafud writes:
>
>> Does anyone *regularly* use hyperfocussing with their wide angle lenses?
>
> I do, but I don't set the "exact" hyperfocal distance according to the lens
>scale. I tend to keep 1-2 stops in reserve
Mafud writes:
> Does anyone *regularly* use hyperfocussing with their wide angle lenses?
I do, but I don't set the "exact" hyperfocal distance according to the lens
scale. I tend to keep 1-2 stops in reserve if possible (eg if my desired
coverage fits within the f/5.6 marks I'll set to f/8 o
George Baumgardner writes:
> If you are patient, or lucky, another fairly good alternative for wide angle
> shots is the old Tamron 17 mm f 3.5 SP.
I've heard that's not a bad lens.
If you are on a tight budget I can suggest the Tokina SL 17mm f/3.5. It's not
a spectacular lens but is very
SMC-M/A 15/3.5, only if you can find one in EX+ condition and at reasonable
price.
regards,
Alan Chan
>I always bring along with my Pentax FA20/f2.8 for taking landscape
>photographs. I satified with the results very much. Now, I would like to
>buy another ultra-wide angle lens of either 15mm o
In a message dated 1/30/01 12:50:11 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Drawbacks to this lens are it is manual focus (not a real big deal
considering the depth of field you get) >>
Does anyone *regularly* use hyperfocussing with their wide angle lenses?
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTE
"Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many of us have been pleased with, and recommend, the Russian-made
> Zenitar 16mm. f2.8 fisheye (available in M42, Pentax K, or Nikon
mount).
> It is sharp, solid, and inexpensive.
>
> Some users report that recent batches have had coating problems,
so
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 22:40 29.1.2001 +0800, you wrote:
> >I always bring along with my Pentax FA20/f2.8 for taking
landscape
> >photographs. I satified with the results very much. Now, I would
like to
> >buy another ultra-wide angle lens of either 15mm or 17mm,
preferably an
> >automati
At 22:40 29.1.2001 +0800, you wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I always bring along with my Pentax FA20/f2.8 for taking landscape
>photographs. I satified with the results very much. Now, I would like to
>buy another ultra-wide angle lens of either 15mm or 17mm, preferably an
>automatic and fixed-focus lens.
13 matches
Mail list logo
