On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:09 AM, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He can bring one less bag, as i won't be there this year.:-(
You won't be there either, Dave?
Bummer.
There won't be a GTA contingent for the first time in a few years...
:-(
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourg
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 9:13 AM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good ol' Cesar.
>
> Packs not only for his worst case scenario but everyone else's too.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
He can bring one less bag, as i won't be there this year.:-(
Dave
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Cesar Matamoros II
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pity is that I may not be able to make it up there this year... :-(
I won't be able to go, if that makes any difference on whether you go or not...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartie
Peter Fairweather wrote:
>
> On 23/03/2008, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 23/3/08, Cesar Matamoros II, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>> I am way behind on the list - thus the tardy reply...
>>>
>>> I spent a month in Australia in 2006
>> This could explain a lot !
>>
> I didn't even nk
Hmmm
White sandy beaches, temperate weather (ie bikini babe weather) , cold beer.
It's such a wicked punishment.
Cheers,
Dave
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Peter Fairweather
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't even nknow that the minimum setence had been reduced!
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> O
I didn't even nknow that the minimum setence had been reduced!
Peter
On 23/03/2008, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23/3/08, Cesar Matamoros II, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I am way behind on the list - thus the tardy reply...
> >
> >I spent a month in Australia in 2006
>
> This could
On 23/3/08, Cesar Matamoros II, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I am way behind on the list - thus the tardy reply...
>
>I spent a month in Australia in 2006
This could explain a lot !
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
__
frank theriault wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:13 AM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Good ol' Cesar.
>>
>> Packs not only for his worst case scenario but everyone else's too.
>>
>>
>
> Because of Cesar I lost my digital virginity.
>
> It was a dark and stormy night (ac
Scott Loveless wrote:
> jim wrote:
>
>> You currently have northern hemisphere lenses. You will need to sell them
>> and buy southern hemisphere ones.
>> The difference is due to the magnetic fields affect on the light rays coming
>> into the lens.
>> All lens elements are ground different to
I am way behind on the list - thus the tardy reply...
I spent a month in Australia in 2006. I found myself using my widest
lens for capturing the immensity of the place. The other lens was my 77
for portraiture and available light.
I only got to visit Adelaide, Cairns, and the Outback (Uluru,
mike wilson wrote:
>> From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 2008/02/25 Mon PM 08:05:30 GMT
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Subject: Re: Australia Trip -- New Lens
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:13 AM, David Sa
>
> From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2008/02/25 Mon PM 09:59:32 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Australia Trip -- New Lens
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:22 PM, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
You gotta watch where you put your finger . . .
>>> "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/25/2008 3:05 PM >>>
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:13 AM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Good ol' Cesar.
>
> Packs not only for his worst case scenario but everyone else's too.
>
Because of Cesar
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:22 PM, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Did you gain any virtual dignity?
With Cesar? Dignity?
Surely you jest!
cheers,
frank
;-)
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.
There was also an F 70-210 at KEH for a bit more than I'd pay, well at
least it was there yesterday, but it's a fantastic lens...
Brian Walters wrote:
> Quoting Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>> Corey Leopold wrote:
>>
>>> Next May I have a trip planned for Australia and New Zealand.
Quoting Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Corey Leopold wrote:
> > Next May I have a trip planned for Australia and New Zealand.
> Pretty
> > much going to hit the tourist spots, Sydney, Ayers Rock, Cairns,
> > Christchurch...
> >
> > I'm looking to pick up another lens between now and then for
>
> From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2008/02/25 Mon PM 08:05:30 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Australia Trip -- New Lens
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:13 AM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:13 AM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good ol' Cesar.
>
> Packs not only for his worst case scenario but everyone else's too.
>
Because of Cesar I lost my digital virginity.
It was a dark and stormy night (actually, it ~was~ dark and stormy
because it ~alwa
Corey Leopold wrote:
> Next May I have a trip planned for Australia and New Zealand. Pretty
> much going to hit the tourist spots, Sydney, Ayers Rock, Cairns,
> Christchurch...
>
> I'm looking to pick up another lens between now and then for my K10D,
> I was wondering anyone had any recommendati
The Jupiter lens are quite good. After the 2nd WW russian had access to
the Carl Zeiss Jena factory and they copied a lot of CZJ lens. So far I
know the 135mm Jupiter is almost just a rebadge of the famous Carl Zeiss
Jena Sonnar 135. I don't know about the newly made versions, but one
thing is
If you are not a big pixel-hunter and satisfied with the 18-55 then you
might want to take a longer zoom. I am thinking to buy the Tokina 80-400
since it's quite light and the pictures I saw with it are quite nice.
Also the reviews I read were positive about the lens. Since I am pleased
with th
Sure there are used ones available. KEH.com sometimes has, (though the
really desirable ones like the FA 135 seldom stay listed for long), the
and e-bay will have them often, where of course you'll pay a premium,
gone are the days of regularly finding bargains there.
Sandy Harris wrote:
> On M
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Steve Desjardins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's really too bad that the FA 135 2.8 isn't available any more. With
> the DX format, it's a sharp, fast and light telephoto. ...
> Of course, I guess that "not
> available" part does put a damper on its popular
On Feb 24, 2008, at 8:25 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
> Good advice. Mind if I borrow a couple grand?
I don't mind at all. You'll have to find someone willing and able to
loan it to you, of course.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdm
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Corey Leopold wrote:
>
>> Next May I have a trip planned for Australia and New Zealand. Pretty
>> much going to hit the tourist spots, Sydney, Ayers Rock, Cairns,
>> Christchurch...
>>
>> I'm looking to pick up another lens between now and t
I had one for quite a while and found it an excellent performer
overall. What I never really liked about it was the somewhat loose,
wobbly feel of the focusing ring and resulting imprecision when
focusing manually, particularly for settings near infinity. It was
always hard to make a small
It's really too bad that the FA 135 2.8 isn't available any more. With
the DX format, it's a sharp, fast and light telephoto. I never used
this lens much with film, but it suddenly, uh, fills the same place in
my heart as that FA 200 2.8 I used to covet so much. It's odd that it
rarely gets ment
I agree that a longer lens is most useful for some of the animals in the
reservates. Besides the 16-45 I used mostly my 50-200 on my trip to
Australia more than a year ago. Some of my pics from there with both
lenses are at
http://www.dewindvanvoorne.nl/fotoalbum/Australia/index.html
Henk
> DA 50
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jim wrote:
> > You currently have northern hemisphere lenses. You will need to sell them
> and buy southern hemisphere ones.
> > The difference is due to the magnetic fields affect on the light rays
> coming into the
jim wrote:
> You currently have northern hemisphere lenses. You will need to sell them and
> buy southern hemisphere ones.
> The difference is due to the magnetic fields affect on the light rays coming
> into the lens.
> All lens elements are ground different to take this into account.
> Also t
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:54:01 -0500, John Francis wrote:
I forgot about that one.
Thanks John.
James
>Don't forget to replace all your circular polarizers with ones
>that have the opposite twist, too ..
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_
Don't forget to replace all your circular polarizers with ones
that have the opposite twist, too ..
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 02:57:50PM +1000, jim wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:47:34 -0600, Corey Leopold wrote:
>
> You currently have northern hemisphere lenses. You will need to sell them and
>
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:47:34 -0600, Corey Leopold wrote:
You currently have northern hemisphere lenses. You will need to sell them and
buy southern hemisphere ones.
The difference is due to the magnetic fields affect on the light rays coming
into the lens.
All lens elements are ground different
Corey: I have the DA* 50 - 135 & I really like it. I just posted a GESO of
4 informal portraits & all 4 photos were shot with this lens. Cheers,
Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Corey Leopold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:47:34 -0600, Corey Leopold wrote
> Next May I have a trip planned for Australia and New Zealand.
> Pretty much going to hit the tourist spots, Sydney, Ayers Rock,
> Cairns, Christchurch...
>
> I'm looking to pick up another lens between now and then for my K10D,
> I was
Agreed.
On Feb 23, 2008, at 1:17 PM, mike wilson wrote:
>
>>
>> From: "Corey Leopold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 2008/02/23 Sat PM 05:47:34 GMT
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Subject: Australia Trip -- New Lens
>>
>> Next May I have a trip planned for Australia and New Zealand.
>> Pre
On Feb 23, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Corey Leopold wrote:
> Next May I have a trip planned for Australia and New Zealand. Pretty
> much going to hit the tourist spots, Sydney, Ayers Rock, Cairns,
> Christchurch...
>
> I'm looking to pick up another lens between now and then for my K10D,
> I was wonderi
>
> From: "Corey Leopold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2008/02/23 Sat PM 05:47:34 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Australia Trip -- New Lens
>
> Next May I have a trip planned for Australia and New Zealand. Pretty
> much going to hit the tourist spots, Sydney, Ayers Rock, Cairn
Corey,
I like the A35-105 as a good performer if a bit heavy.
You might like a faster wide prime 28-31mm or even 50mm.
On an OZ & NZ trip in '06, I mainly used the DA16-45 zoom.
You can see the results in 6 Picasa web albums...
The ones shot Oct 28, 2006 thru Nov 17, 2006
http://picasaweb.google
DA 16-45 or 16-50
...or if you're satisfied with the 18-55
DA 50-200 or 50-135.
I think if your just going to see the major landmarks, favour the wide
lenses. But when you hit the zoos/wildlife preserves you'll want
something longer.
Cheers,
Dave
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Corey Leopold
40 matches
Mail list logo
