It's amazing to me how iso 1600 has become a no big deal setting.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bruce
Walker
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 7:46 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO Brownman Sundar [Re: DA 35 v. FA 31
Doug Brewer wrote:
Graydon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:35:17PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit:
Yeah, I gather the 31 has that certain je ne se qua that not one can
measure but many can see. I doubt not that it exists. But compared
to the DA35, it's an expensive bit of français.
Do
2009/7/28 Graydon o...@uniserve.com:
Do you need to take pictures of fine colour detail in daylight? The DA35
is superior to the FA31 for that purpose, especially in the high end of
spectrum. (Flower-purples.)
So the DA 35 Ltd has Flower Power? Who knew it was a hippie lens!!!
--M.
--
Groovy.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Miserere
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 12:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: DA 35 v. FA 31
2009/7/28 Graydon o...@uniserve.com:
Do you need to take pictures of fine colour
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:42:08PM -0400, Miserere scripsit:
2009/7/28 Graydon o...@uniserve.com:
Do you need to take pictures of fine colour detail in daylight? The DA35
is superior to the FA31 for that purpose, especially in the high end of
spectrum. (Flower-purples.)
So the DA 35 Ltd
If it's of any use, both have been tested on Photozone:
http://www.photozone.de/pentax/122-pentax-smc-fa-31mm-f18-al-limited-review--test-report
http://www.photozone.de/pentax/393-pentax_35_28
Along with the FA 35/2:
Ned Bunnell shares some background why they called it a macro:
http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2009/07/da-35mm-macro-year-later.html.
The DA35 is simply amazing.
Toine
2009/7/28 Desjardins, Steve desjard...@wlu.edu:
I'm curious if anyone has any experience with both of these lenses. If not,
Desjardins, Steve wrote:
I'm curious if anyone has any experience with both of these lenses.
If not, can anyone tell me something about performance of the DA 35?
Thanks.
Steve, I have had the DA 35 for a year and a half and I love it. I use
it for both macro work and as a carry-around.
2009/7/27 Graydon o...@uniserve.com:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:22:29PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit:
The FA31 is faster, larger, is practical for ambient light indoor
photography, and has a very particular rendering **I despair to describe.**
Graydon,
On behalf on the League of
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:59:34AM -0400, Miserere scripsit:
2009/7/27 Graydon o...@uniserve.com:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:22:29PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit:
The FA31 is faster, larger, is practical for ambient light indoor
photography, and has a very particular rendering **I
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 12:44 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: DA 35 v. FA 31
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:59:34AM -0400, Miserere scripsit:
2009/7/27 Graydon o...@uniserve.com:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:22:29PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit:
The FA31 is faster, larger
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:35:17PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit:
Yeah, I gather the 31 has that certain je ne se qua that not one can
measure but many can see. I doubt not that it exists. But compared
to the DA35, it's an expensive bit of français.
Do you need to take pictures in
Graydon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:35:17PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit:
Yeah, I gather the 31 has that certain je ne se qua that not one can
measure but many can see. I doubt not that it exists. But compared
to the DA35, it's an expensive bit of français.
Do you need to take
That's why it's Limited. ;-)
the da35 stops working if you take it inside?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
OK, that's good way to think of it.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Graydon
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 1:57 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: DA 35 v. FA 31
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:35:17PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:08:47PM -0400, Doug Brewer scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:35:17PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit:
Yeah, I gather the 31 has that certain je ne se qua that not one can
measure but many can see. I doubt not that it exists. But compared
to the
Graydon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:08:47PM -0400, Doug Brewer scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:35:17PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit:
Yeah, I gather the 31 has that certain je ne se qua that not one can
measure but many can see. I doubt not that it exists. But
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:34:22PM -0400, Bruce Walker scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
The DA35 isn't fast enough to take pictures of small children running
around inside in relatively dim mixed lighting without pushing the ISO
on the K20D up into useless.
Which is what I should have written in the
Graydon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:34:22PM -0400, Bruce Walker scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
The DA35 isn't fast enough to take pictures of small children running
around inside in relatively dim mixed lighting without pushing the ISO
on the K20D up into useless.
Which is what I should have
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 07:46:17PM -0400, Bruce Walker scripsit:
In support of using the SMC P-DA 1:2.8 35mm Macro Limited in dark jazz
clubs, I present ...
Brownman Sundar: http://is.gd/1RK5s
Flickr page: http://is.gd/1RKoU
K100D Super, DA 35, f/2.8, 1/20, ISO 1600
Not the best
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:22:29PM -0400, Desjardins, Steve scripsit:
I'm curious if anyone has any experience with both of these lenses.
If not, can anyone tell me something about performance of the DA 35?
Thanks.
It's not really a vs.
The FA31 is faster, larger, is practical for ambient
21 matches
Mail list logo
